Of course energy method is superior to elementary school torque and leverage. It is far more difficult to master and comprehend and can be used for far more complex problems.
Feel free to print my answer and study it.
Aaahhhh, Just kidding men:cool:
I explained it using a scientific way, based in energy terms. This is how things make perfect sense, when one abides to scientific ethics.
To use torque is not compatible with energy terms, which i had in mind. (conservation of energy)
The explanation to sum it up, was clearly fulfilling for me...
It certainly can happen. Simple example: 26 tyres with super gravity casing and 29 tyres with snakeskin.
It stands, i explained it scientifically here :happydance:
I clarified that we have same weight, same velocity 26 and 29 bikes that have equal kinetic Energy -> which means that rotating mass will have to be the same.
This is a false statement since the kinetic Energy of a bike relates only to mass and velocity (After transforming the translational and...
This is what I'm saying, this is a false statement. Again: the kinetic Energy of a bike relates only to mass and velocity (After transforming the translational and rotational kinetic Energy equations), radius of wheel is irrelevant.
Same weight, same velocity 26 and 29 bikes, have equal...
This is a false statement since the kinetic Energy of a bike relates only to mass and velocity (After transforming the translational and rotational kinetic Energy equations), radius of wheel is irrelevant.
i think it is quite accurate, it was performed in the hope lab.
Where did you buy them from? I am thinking of freeborn or ubyk.
Do they have at least the power/decceleration of the guides? (what pads are the best?)
sram brakes are over for me.
I want to ride or else, i might waited for...
so, code rsc have the same problems? Or nothing has been reported? Cause guides have been plagued with this shitty problem!
hope V4 will provide adequate braking power? i read the enduro mtb test, and v4 don't have that much decelarating power, like code, mt5, zee and are supposed to give you...
I have guide rsc on my bike, with bleeding edge, the 2017 model that should not have problems with the piston. However, yesterday, in a hot day, 35 celsius, and riding for much time in direct sunlight, the pads suddenly rubbed the brake disc a lot (i almost couldn't ride uphill), and the lever...
Hallo!
I want to buy the vpd 2.0 knee pad (the dh short version, which i guess is the same in sizing as the normal 2.0)
My measurements are:
38cm (15 in) 10 cm below knee
43cm (17 in) 10 cm below knee
Should i go medium or large.
I read contradicting sizing reviews.
Leg measurement and your...
With that 1/2 turn past contact, did you get zero lateral play (no klunk when moving the wheel side to side with your hand)?
Also, With that 1/2 turn past contact, did you get a nice spin from the wheel? I am having about 1 turn past contact, but the free spin is night and day compared to hope...
Hallo!
I have a a mavic wheelset with the its 4 system, that uses a preload adjuster.
In the end of the video, it indicates how to preload correctly the bearings.
1. when adjusting the preload, the video indicates to stop when contact happens. what does this mean? When you feel the cap...
Another weird thing is that, if you see the LR above and the force chart below, you really wonder how is it possible commencal, norco and specialized to have higher forces in the 80-180mm region... Tues has the most progressive design with lower lr ratio in each wheel travel increment.
Bear in...
No, 1 turn that cc proposes is from plush... No logic in this, really can't comprehend it!
I believe that with such a progressive LR in the tues and low LR rate in the last 100mm of travel, even if i lower a lot the HSC (~0.25 turns), i won't have a bottom out issue, or a mid support issue...
I have a yt tues 2012, the LR chart is this:
Very progressive, with a low starting LR and a very very low ending LR.
At sag (30%) the LR is ~2.65.
Cane creek proposes for this frame 2.5 turns for HSC, which i find really high.
For reference, santa cruz v10 has this LR chart
at sag (30%)...
Hallo!
I have a meta 5.5.3 2009 model.
The shock is FOX FLOAT R.
The bushings that are needed are 22.2x8
I have found 2 types of these:
https://www.commencal-store.co.uk/ride-alpha-hardware-22-x-8-c2x17786745...
What about a 2.3 dhf dual in the rear?
I read that it rolls better than the dhr2, good grip in all conditions, it's just a bit worse than dhr2 in braking.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.