Here are the images of the new DHR!!!!
2010 Turner DHR!!!
- Thread starter jncarpenter
- Start date
-
- Tags
- wheres my lahar?
I want one.
That's a short HT.
That's a short HT.
Got to ride one in the parking lot in US Open and all I can say is that, this thing is rad. Feels very good. and Pretty light also. But I still think its fugly 
Hm, interesting. Looks much less Turner'esque' than the last proto, which I believe was something they really wanted to maintain, but I heard there were difficulties with manufacturability.
This one is still pretty cool looking though, and probably a bit lighter.
Heres the oldie for reference:
This one is still pretty cool looking though, and probably a bit lighter.
Heres the oldie for reference:
Great job Dave and DW!!!!! Have to say I like the Raw look better than the White and Green.
Cecil
Cecil
important question: when are they going to be available to the general public, and for how much?
Sorry if this ruffles anyones feathers but I couldn't resist. I think the proto image may be of a small frame as it pieced together a little weird.
Looks much better "built up". Kind of a strange looking frame but i'm picturing sunday suspension with classic turner handling...nice.
Nearly messed my screen. 
I've got my deposit ready!
...anyone wanna buy some crack? Special price!
...anyone wanna buy some crack? Special price!
awesome test i betGot to ride one in the parking lot in US Open and all I can say is that, this thing is rad. Feels very good. and Pretty light also. But I still think its fugly
I want that downtube.
if it passes the parkin lot it must be amazing, same to the other guy from the sea otter parking lot.
looks like Dave and DW are really putting some time into this bike, which is good! good things happen to those who wait.
I don't know why, but I like the original proto a little bit better. That's not to say I don't like the current one though. I'd still hit it.
Here are a few more veiws of the new frame.
Attachments
They usually don't change the appearance of a bike to make it look cool or not, it usually has to do with performance and durability. If you buy a bike because it looks cool than you are doing it wrong haha.
but this is the interweb, maybe im reading your post wrong?
Yeah, I agree with what you are saying. I don't think builders/designers as precise and meticulous as Dave and Dave would make any change unless it were necessary or beneficial. On top of that, while I think aesthetics play into many buyers' decisions they are usually a far second to performance and build quality. I am just saying, I prefer the looks of one over the other. Just like I typically like brunettes more than blonds. But that does not mean they are better in bed.
Aside from appearance and reputation, right now I have nothing else to base a decision on anyway since I haven't ridden one.
Last edited:
You know Missy?I've got my deposit ready!
...anyone wanna buy some crack? Special price!
crack is for poor people
Oh they handles, they does. They handles!
still vaporware...
Those first renderings don't really paint it in a flattering light. The built up version looks nice as do the blue renderings above.
Its the new Sunday for sure.
Its the new Sunday for sure.
Wow they made that thing even prettier, any changes to the geo?
Wonder if Turner would swap me one for a 5 day old baby and my old Sunday, hmmmmmmm.
Wonder if Turner would swap me one for a 5 day old baby and my old Sunday, hmmmmmmm.
Yeah, they never do. You would never have to drill anything to get the geometry better on their bikes....
Better is a matter of opinion. Fabien Barel rode bikes that most people couldn't pedal 10 feet, but to him, they were better.
What makes you think that?
I read it on the intradweeb