Quantcast

Pesqueeb

bicycle in airplane hangar
Feb 2, 2007
40,432
16,967
Riding the baggage carousel.
But I am incognito...:dirol:
Don't say I never did anything nice for you. :cupidarrow:



If the Russia scandal is nothing but a witch hunt, as President Drumpf so often says, it’s awfully strange that he’s going to so much trouble to cover it up.

Last night, Ashley Parker, Carol D. Leonnig, Philip Rucker and Tom Hamburger broke the latest blockbuster story in this scandal, in which the president dictated a misleading statement about the nature of the fateful meeting his son Donald Drumpf Jr., his son-in-law Jared Kushner, and his then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort had with a group of Russians during the campaign:

On the sidelines of the Group of 20 summit in Germany last month, President Drumpf’s advisers discussed how to respond to a new revelation that Drumpf’s oldest son had met with a Russian lawyer during the 2016 campaign — a disclosure the advisers knew carried political and potentially legal peril.

The strategy, the advisers agreed, should be for Donald Drumpf Jr. to release a statement to get ahead of the story. They wanted to be truthful, so their account couldn’t be repudiated later if the full details emerged.

But within hours, at the president’s direction, the plan changed.

Flying home from Germany on July 8 aboard Air Force One, Drumpf personally dictated a statement in which Drumpf Jr. said that he and the Russian lawyer had “primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children” when they met in June 2016, according to multiple people with knowledge of the deliberations. The statement, issued to the New York Times as it prepared an article, emphasized that the subject of the meeting was “not a campaign issue at the time.”

The claims were later shown to be misleading.

In case you haven’t been following, the meeting occurred because Drumpf Jr. was promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton that was presented to him as coming from the Russian government. He summoned Kushner and Manafort, forwarding them the email in which that offer was made. They joined him at the meeting, which was attended by a lawyer with close ties to the Kremlin, a former Russian intelligence officer and a gentleman who was once the subject of a congressional inquiry into an enormous Russian money-laundering operation. According to Drumpf Jr. and Kushner’s version of events, the damaging information didn’t materialize, and the Russians were more interested in discussing the potential repeal of the Magnitsky Act, which sanctioned certain Russian individuals accused of corruption and human rights abuses. So the line from the Drumpf team is essentially that they were trying to collude with the Russian government to help their campaign, but the attempt was unsuccessful.

This latest story is clearly one of the most significant developments in this scandal to date, for two reasons. First, it describes an organized effort to mislead the public — not to spin, or minimize the story, or distract from it, or throw out wild accusations about someone else, but to intentionally fool everyone into believing something false. Second, it implicates the president himself. Indeed, the most extraordinary part of the picture this story paints is that while other people involved were recommending some measure of transparency on the assumption that the truth would come out eventually, they were overruled by the president, who personally dictated the misleading statement.

And it gets worse. Once the story broke, Drumpf’s own lawyer went to the media and denied that the president was involved in the drafting of the misleading statement. In two televised interviews, Jay Sekulow said “the president was not involved in the drafting of the statement,” “The president didn’t sign off on anything,” and “The president wasn’t involved in that.” While it’s theoretically possible that Sekulow would make emphatic statements of fact like those about what his client did or didn’t do without actually asking Drumpf, that seems almost impossible to believe. Sekulow is a prominent attorney who knows exactly what kind of trouble that could bring, both to himself and his client. So the only reasonable conclusion is that he was repeating what Drumpf told him.

So, to put this together: The president of the United States personally wrote a statement about this meeting with the Russians, a statement that everyone involved knew to be false. Going further, he then either lied to his own lawyer about his involvement so that the lawyer would repeat that lie publicly (highly likely) or was candid with his lawyer and persuaded him to lie to the media on his behalf (much less likely).

We all know what the official White House line about this story is going to be: The real problem isn’t what Drumpf did; it’s the fact that it was leaked! I’m reminded of something the sadly departed Anthony Scaramucci said during his brief tenure as White House communication director: “There are people inside the administration who think it is their job to save America from this president.” He was right — or at the very least, they’re trying to save him from himself.

It has been entertaining to watch the ongoing soap opera of this White House — the infighting, the backstabbing, the firings, the general air of chaos — but it’s important to remember that the biggest problem it has is the man who sits in the Oval Office. The fact that Drumpf assumed that he could engineer this mini-coverup and the truth would never get out, both about the meeting itself and about his role in misleading the public about it, shows just how deluded he is about how his own White House works.

Let’s return to that scene on Air Force One. A damaging story is breaking, and Drumpf’s advisers are facing the dilemma many administrations have faced before: How do we deal with it? How much information should we voluntarily reveal? Is there a way to make the story go away that won’t set us up for even more trouble down the road? While they were debating those questions, the one person to whom no one could say no told them how it was going to be: They were going to lie. And as is so often the case with Drumpf, the lie was quickly revealed for what it was.

I promise you, the substantial number of people involved in that discussion were profoundly uncomfortable with Drumpf’s instructions. For a political flack, nothing inspires more dread than putting out a story that you know is bogus and that you don’t think will hold up.

Their fears were inevitably realized, and now the Russia scandal has reached all the way to the president himself. Something tells me there’s more to come.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
41,392
13,507
Portland, OR
Boy Scouts say he's full of sh!t

President Donald Trump told the Wall Street Journal that after his controversial speech at the Boy Scouts National Jamboree in West Virginia, the head of the Boy Scouts called him and told him it was “the greatest speech that was ever made to them.” But the organization told TIME they are unaware of any call from national leadership placed to the White House.
They loved it! My speech was the bigliest ever in the history of evar.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
why bother with russia? trump has his own bankrupt airline, no?
Old fleet of junk planes with tiny hands. They're 727s and probably sold by now.

“He certainly was a man known for his bravado. He promised people a diamond in the sky when we had 21 of some of the oldest, worst maintained 727s then flying,” said Harteveldt, the marketing director. “He’s giving a press conference promising a diamond in the sky. I’m saying, ‘You may have to settle for cubic zirconium to start.’ ”
 

Adventurous

Starshine Bro
Mar 19, 2014
10,398
9,004
Crawlorado
Clearly he is finding nothing and needs more help making up fake evidence for this witch hunt.
Not just any ordinary witch hunt, but the greatest witch hunt in the history of ever. So prodigious in fact that news of its prodigiousness will travel back through time to when the term witch hunt was first coined and it will instead be declared a Trump hunt.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
54,580
20,394
Sleazattle
Not just any ordinary witch hunt, but the greatest witch hunt in the history of ever. So prodigious in fact that news of its prodigiousness will travel back through time to when the term witch hunt was first coined and it will instead be declared a Trump hunt.
There is an easier way:

V: Tell me... what do you do with witches?
P3: Burn'em! Burn them up! (burn burn burn)
V: What do you burn apart from witches?
P1: More witches! (P2 nudge P1)
(pause)
P3: Wood!
V: So, why do witches burn?
(long pause)
P2: Cuz they're made of... wood?
V: Gooood.
(crowd congratulates P2)
V: So, how do we tell if she is made of wood?
P1: Build a bridge out of her!
V: Ahh, but can you not also make bridges out of stone?
P1: Oh yeah...
V: Does wood sink in water?
P1: No
P3: No. It floats!
P1: Let's throw her into the bog! (yeah yeah ya!)
V: What also floats in water?
P1: Bread
P3: Apples
P2: Very small rocks
(V looks annoyed)
P1: Cider
P3: Grape gravy
P1: Cherries
P3: Mud
King: A Duck!
(all look and stare at king)
V: Exactly! So, logically...
P1(thinking): If she ways the same as a duck... she's made of wood!
V: And therefore,
(pause & think)
P3: A witch!
 

Pesqueeb

bicycle in airplane hangar
Feb 2, 2007
40,432
16,967
Riding the baggage carousel.
Turns out the mooch was thrown under the bus!
I'm fairly well convinced the whole thing was a deliberate play to distract from Browders testimony.

This was a fascinating (and by that I mean really scary) NPR piece I listenend to just the other day about Browder.
http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/07/14/537304186/episode-784-meeting-the-russians

A more in depth read here:
http://www.npr.org/2017/07/28/539802914/businessman-paints-a-terrifying-and-complex-picture-of-putins-russia
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
41,392
13,507
Portland, OR
Need a vacation after so much winning

Trump said last year that he wouldn't have time for golf if he became president. "I'm going to be working for you, I'm not going to have time to go play golf," he told supporters in Virginia. But he plays golf whenever he's at his clubs; sometimes it's the full 18 holes, other times less than that. His staff rarely acknowledges that he plays, even when photos of him on the course pop up on social media.
Immigration? Done.
Tax Reform? Done
Healthcare? Done

Only thing left is the wall, and the president of Mexico called him the other day and said to send him the bill.
 

Sandro

Terrified of Cucumbers
Nov 12, 2006
3,226
2,538
The old world
If you thought the WSJ transcripts earlier this week were sad, well....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/politics/australia-mexico-transcripts/?utm_term=.12379030aaef





Peña Nieto: […] This is what I suggest, Mr. President – let us stop talking about the wall. I have recognized the right of any government to protect its borders as it deems necessary and convenient. But my position has been and will continue to be very firm saying that Mexico cannot pay for that wall.

Trump: But you cannot say that to the press. The press is going to go with that and I cannot live with that. You cannot say that to the press because I cannot negotiate under those circumstances.
[…]
Trump: Okay, Enrique, that is fine and I think it is fair. I do not bring up the wall but when the press brings up the wall, I will say, “let us see how it is going – let us see how it is working out with Mexico.” Because from an economic issue, it is the least important thing we were talking about, but psychologically, it means something so let us just say “we will work it out.”​
 

Pesqueeb

bicycle in airplane hangar
Feb 2, 2007
40,432
16,967
Riding the baggage carousel.
Last edited:

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
86,204
24,709
media blackout
Well that kind of feels like a foregone conclusion, doesn't it?

If we ever get to experience a post Trump administration, who ever that may be had better put the screws to all of these people or the god damn rule of law is dead in this country.
in regards to the grand jury, i saw someone comment that in the (somewhat unlikely) scenario that none of them have actually committed a crime, they're such a bunch of bumbling idiots that they'd probably perjure themselves if they had to testify :rofl: