Quantcast

Vegetarians come and show yourselves!

biggins

Rump Junkie
May 18, 2003
7,173
9
i dont think anyone really cares what the other person eats i think it is more the principal of the issue. saying one is vegetarian and eats fish is very much incongruent and hypocritical. i dont care what anyone eats at all. but saying one thing and doing another is just kind of silly to me. Its like a girl i know that got pregnant at 17 years old. She attends church every wed. night and twice on saturday and is a self proclaimed devout christian. when she got pregnant she would not get an abortion due to her religious beliefs but if she truly was a christian she wouldnt have been having premarital sex in the first place. much like a vegetarian should not be eating meat if they claim themselves to be vegetarian.

on that note however, i tried, well actually was forced to eat vegetarian for a couple of weeks. it did not work well for me at all. i was lethargic, cranky and sleepy the ehtire time. as soon as i got some meat in my system however i was back up to speed.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
biggins said:
on that note however, i tried, well actually was forced to eat vegetarian for a couple of weeks. it did not work well for me at all. i was lethargic, cranky and sleepy the ehtire time. as soon as i got some meat in my system however i was back up to speed.
Bad dieting is bad dieting regardless if it includes meat or not. Its harder to eat a proper diet as a vegetarian, but you can still get a balanced diet as a vegetarian or omnivore.
 

Echo

crooked smile
Jul 10, 2002
11,819
15
Slacking at work
chicodude said:
Fish = meat = You not being a vegitarian
you + worrying about what I eat = irrelevant

When I go to a restaurant I ask if what I'm ordering is vegetarian. To me, that means I'm telling them I want something with no meat, no fish, and no chicken or beef stock. I've never had anyone try to tell me that chicken is vegetarian, that's for sure.
 

biggins

Rump Junkie
May 18, 2003
7,173
9
syadasti said:
Bad dieting is bad dieting regardless if it includes meat or not. Its harder to eat a proper diet as a vegetarian, but you can still get a balanced diet as a vegetarian or omnivore.
thats the thing is the people i was with were all very healthy lifelong vegetarians raised by vegetarians and had vegetarian kids. it just didnt work well with my body.

one of my favorite places to eat in asheville is a vegetarian place and damn it is good.i personally eat every kind of meat but i would say pork is my favorite.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
biggins said:
thats the thing is the people i was with were all very healthy lifelong vegetarians raised by vegetarians and had vegetarian kids. it just didnt work well with my body.
Yeah but it takes a fair bit of time to change your diet regardless if the change includes meat or not. Your body doesn't adapt to changes over night. Similarly various drugs/vitamins don't have much of an effect until after you've been taking them a month.
 

chicodude

The Spooninator
Mar 28, 2004
1,054
2
Paradise
Echo said:
you + worrying about what I eat = irrelevant

When I go to a restaurant I ask if what I'm ordering is vegetarian. To me, that means I'm telling them I want something with no meat, no fish, and no chicken or beef stock. I've never had anyone try to tell me that chicken is vegetarian, that's for sure.

I could really care less what you eat, but if you want the title of a vegetarian, YOU GET NO FISH

:clue:
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,098
1,144
NC
chicodude said:
I could really care less what you eat, but if you want the title of a vegetarian, YOU GET NO FISH
I couldn't care less about how you speak, but I just thought you should know that your statement is incorrect. Do you use double negatives, too? :D
 

MudGrrl

AAAAH! Monkeys stole my math!
Mar 4, 2004
3,123
0
Boston....outside of it....
Vegetarians and Fish

Most writers like to build up to the point they're trying to make, but what I've got to say is so important that I'm just going to bung it into the second paragraph so you don't miss it. Are you ready? Here goes.

Vegetarians don't eat fish.

There. I've said it. And most readers are now going, "what's the big deal, I knew that". But an annoying percentage of you are saying, "well, SOME vegetarians eat fish ..."

Sure, and some teetotallers drink beer and wine. Look it up in the Macquarie dictionary. The entry goes on about vegetable and farinaceous matter, before stating "refusing meat, fish, etc" - because, and I'll whisper it here, a fish is not a vegetable.

Now it's true that, by the dictionary's definition, the true vegetarian is a vegan, someone who eschews all animal products. Many vegos stray towards dairy or even eggs.

But a fish, which you catch with a hook, which fights to remain in its environment, and which then flaps and gasps its last in a layer of bloody water at the bottom of the boat? Not very vegetarian.

Nevertheless, vegetarians are always being asked if they eat fish. The word is becoming so debased that you can go to dinner at a friend's house, having warned them of your diet, to be told, "Oh, I made a tuna bake especially for you". It's pretty awkward having to decline, especially when your host says, in bafflement, "Well, a lot of vegetarians eat fish", as if you're just being unnecessarily unreasonable.

So who is to blame? Meat-eaters can be blamed for a lot of things (supporting animal cruelty and the destruction of Australia's fragile environment are two things that spring readily to mind), but they're in the clear on this one.

No, the fault lies with the wannabe vegetarians, the people who think it's something cool to claim, but who couldn't be bothered to go the whole hog, as it were, by forgoing the whole animal kingdom.

There are other words they can use to describe themselves. Vegaquarian is clever and catchy, or even pescatarian (peskies for short). "Dietary poseur" is perhaps too vague. Or how about just, "I don't eat meat"? Although it can be argued that fish is a meat,

"meat" and "fish" are separate on most menus, so we can live with this differentiation.

But please, can we keep the fish out of vegetarian? The next thing we know, similar words and phrases will cease to have meaning.

"I'm a non-smoker, but I always puff on a cigar after dinner."

"I'm sedentary, but I go for a run every morning."

"I'm celibate, but I have sex now and again."

You see how annoying it can become? Seriously, I've had enough. Sooner or later, some waiter in a restaurant with nothing but animals on the carte is going to respond, as they so often do, to my query about vegetarian options by asking me if I eat fish, and it's going to be the last straw.

I'm a pacifist, but I might throw my menu at him.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
SkaredShtles said:
This writer gets a hearty "STFU" for this one. :mad: :nuts:
What he really meant was: "Meat eaters can be blamed for keeping the natural order for life as long as life as been around. Without carnivores ecosystems would collapse. There is nothing unnatural about eating meat. Evolution can't be wrong but I certainly can be."

My take - everything in moderation...
 

Jim Mac

MAKE ENDURO GREAT AGAIN
May 21, 2004
6,352
282
the middle east of NY
Veg since '93.

No I don't eat fish, though fish have eaten me before. Long story short, it involved puking while out on a snorkeling/dive trip and a school of fish that devoured the aforementioned puke so much that one popped into my mouth to 'finish it up'.
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,650
1,121
NORCAL is the hizzle
syadasti said:
What he really meant was: "Meat eaters can be blamed for keeping the natural order for life as long as life as been around. Without carnivores ecosystems would collapse. There is nothing unnatural about eating meat. Evolution can't be wrong but I certainly can be."

My take - everything in moderation...
Do you really believe this? I'm a carnivore but there is nothing natural about industrial meat production. In fact, forcing cattle to eat corn instead of grass is going against what nature has equipped ruminants to eat.

I agree with what you say about moderation but spare us this bit about the natural order. We are consuming way too much of the wrong things to point to nature as an excuse.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
OGRipper said:
Do you really believe this? I'm a carnivore but there is nothing natural about industrial meat production. In fact, forcing cattle to eat corn instead of grass is going against what nature has equipped ruminants to eat.

I agree with what you say about moderation but spare us this bit about the natural order. We are consuming way too much of the wrong things to point to nature as an excuse.
I never mentioned commercial meat production. Commercial farms, may it be meat or vegetables, have the short-term bottom line as their primary concern. Cattle aren't natural to NA either - native animals like bison, deer, elk, mountain goat, moose, mountain sheep, etc would be the lower impact, more responsible choice for farming.

My point is there is nothing wrong with eating other animals - its natural behavior. Humans are animals and evolved as omnivores and eat as such. Just cause most companies are making and selling a less than ideal meat product or the average consumption is too high doesn't mean meat in itself is bad.

Also if you want to talk about really hurting an ecosystem (the biggest on earth by far), look to the fishing industry. There are numerous fish species that are being harvested unsustainably.

In Canada species have been wiped out and fishing towns ruined - everyone loses.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
Here are the terms you need for the new age vegetarians:

"pescatarian", "pescotarian", and "piscatarian" - veggies who eat fish

"pollotarian" - veggies who eat chicken
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,650
1,121
NORCAL is the hizzle
syadasti said:
I never mentioned commercial meat production. Commercial farms, may it be meat or vegetables, mostly have the bottom line as their concern. Cattle aren't natural to NA either, Bison would be the proper choice.

My point is there is nothing wrong with eating other animals - its natural behavior. Humans are animals and evolved as omnivores and eat as such. Just cause most companies are making and selling a less than ideal meat product or the average consumption is too high doesn't mean meat in itself is bad.

Also if you want to talk about really hurting an ecosystem, look to the fishing industry. There are numerous fish species that are being harvested unsustainably.

In Canada species have been wiped out and fishing towns ruined - everyone loses.
I agree there is nothing wrong with eating animals, I just don't buy the justification you are using. It's only part of the natural order if you eat and kill only what you need to survive, and don't manipulate nature to bend to your will. There is very little that is natural about our nation's current meat and fish supply, and we have significantly departed from the natural order. Props to you if you seek it out, but only the tiniest fraction comes from sustainable sources. The rest comes from feedlots, fish farms, and other contrivances that we have created to meet a demand that would have outstripped supply long ago in any natural system.

Using your example of fish, do you think fish farms are environmentally friendly or part of the natural order? Most are not the former, and none are the latter. Sure, they help us meet the demand for species that are being over-fished to the point of extinction. But reducing the demand should be part of the approach.

Instead we figure out different ways to deliver what the consumer wants, for cheap money, regardless of the waste generated by the operation and regardless of the fuel needed to run the operation and transport the product.

There is no easy answer. Sure fish farms help protect fragile species. But they help reinforce the notion that we can have whatever we want as long as we're willing to pay, even if most people don't know the real cost.
 

SkaredShtles

Michael Bolton
Sep 21, 2003
65,639
12,701
In a van.... down by the river
OGRipper said:
<snip>

There is no easy answer. Sure fish farms help protect fragile species. But they help reinforce the notion that we can have whatever we want as long as we're willing to pay, even if most people don't know the real cost.
Hopefully gas will get heinously expensive and local farms will start sprouting up again. :thumb:
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
OGRipper said:
I agree there is nothing wrong with eating animals

...

There is no easy answer.
Some commercial large scale fruit, vegetable, etc farming isn't sustainable either, so you can't buy the justification for general vegetarianism either unless you know your products come from sustainable farm practices.

So your point is???
 

SkaredShtles

Michael Bolton
Sep 21, 2003
65,639
12,701
In a van.... down by the river
syadasti said:
Some commercial large scale fruit, vegetable, etc farming isn't sustainable either, so you can't buy the justification for general vegetarianism either unless you know your products come from sustainable farm practices.

So your point is???
I think maybe I need to move back to the Midwest and live off the land. :(

Naaaaaah. :D
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
Also farmed fish doesn't always pollute the environment either.

Farmed Clams, Mussels, Oysters, Crawfish are sustainable and actually clean the environment.

Farmed fish like Shrimp, Tilapia, Bass, Catfish are low impact and are sustainable using the right methods.
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,650
1,121
NORCAL is the hizzle
syadasti said:
Some commercial large scale fruit, vegetable, etc farming isn't sustainable either, so you can't buy the justification for general vegetarianism either unless you know your products come from sustainable farm practices.

So your point is???
My point is as I stated: I agree that it's ok to eat animals, but I don't agree with people justifying it by saying it is part of the natural order. That's only true if you believe that by virtue of our "natural" superior intellect, anything we create must be "natural."

When people ask me (or when I ask myself) why I eat meat, I say "Because I like it." I try to be aware of where it comes from, how it's produced, etc., but in the end, IMO there is no good reason. So I make my choice and live with it. Saying "I am man, man eats meat, therefore I eat meat" is not a good enough reason for me. But if it works for you, great.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
OGRipper said:
When people ask me (or when I ask myself) why I eat meat, I say "Because I like it." I try to be aware of where it comes from, how it's produced, etc., but in the end, IMO there is no good reason. So I make my choice and live with it. Saying "I am man, man eats meat, therefore I eat meat" is not a good enough reason for me. But if it works for you, great.
That argument could apply to any food not sustainably produced, so I could say the same thing about a vegetarian if they buy various conventional produce at supermarkets. So I guess everyone has to justify reason they eat anything then:rolleyes:
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,650
1,121
NORCAL is the hizzle
syadasti said:
That argument could apply to any food not sustainably produced, so I could say the same thing about a vegetarian if they buy various conventional produce at supermarkets. So I guess everyone has to justify reason they eat anything then:rolleyes:
I don't know why but you seem to be getting defensive. You are absolutely right, some vegetarians have less idea about what they eat and where it comes from than some meat eaters.

I am not sure I understand that last sentence but um yeah, we should all try to justify the things we eat. Vegetarian, omnivore, whatever, we should all be more aware of the true cost of the things we choose to consume. Otherwise we'd be spending our lives in an uninformed fog, eating whatever is new at the KFC, regardless of the cost to ourselves, the environment, etc.

The hard part is figuring out where responsibility ends and lunch starts. For most of us, it's a compromise. But we should at least make an effort to ask the questions and make informed decisions.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
OGRipper said:
I am not sure I understand that last sentence but um yeah, we should all try to justify the things we eat. Vegetarian, omnivore, whatever, we should all be more aware of the true cost of the things we choose to consume. Otherwise we'd be spending our lives in an uninformed fog, eating whatever is new at the KFC, regardless of the cost to ourselves, the environment, etc.
Welcome to America :help:
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
My point of looking to nature is that an animal's diet does not become invalid due to modern practices, so called morals values, or other reasoning. Our natural dieting needs are still valid and are a product of natural evolutionary forces. You can't change merely on a whim, it takes many many generations. Nutritional requirements will remain the same and you can't reason your way out of biological reality. You can adapt and use modern nutritional knowledge to acceptably meet them as a vegetarian.

I am not suggesting unsubstainable practices, just stating what reality of a natural proper diet.

Like I said before, everything in moderation. It applies to many things in life...
 

kindtrails

Monkey
May 23, 2006
135
1
Humboldt
GO VEGITARIANS! I have been a vegetarian for 15 years now (longer than the period that I ate meat) Damn I love tofu!--It seems to me the more the food is processed, the worse it is for you. We all need to eat more whole foods (myself included).
 

Tenchiro

Attention K Mart Shoppers
Jul 19, 2002
5,407
0
New England
kindtrails said:
GO VEGITARIANS! I have been a vegetarian for 15 years now (longer than the period that I ate meat) Damn I love tofu!--It seems to me the more the food is processed, the worse it is for you. We all need to eat more whole foods (myself included).
Isn't Tofu highly processed?