Quantcast

WW II Flashback: 'Terrorists' Kill 1,000 Americans in Postwar Germany

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
WW II Flashback: 'Terrorists' Kill 1,000 Americans in Postwar Germany
NewsMax.com | 11/16/04 | Carl Limbacher

The president declared victory over a year ago, but terrorists continue to pick off U.S. troops and even American civilians at the rate of three per day.

The maniacal dictator may be long gone, but his hard-core followers continue to wreak havoc across the land, with the interim government seemingly powerless to stop the mayhem. Back home, the press takes an increasingly pessimistic tone, with some of the most prominent news organs pronouncing the U.S.'s postwar strategy an abject failure.

Iraq 2004? Not exactly.

Try Germany 1946, in the first year after World War II.

To hear the liberals tell the story, once the Allies conquered the Nazis, they stayed conquered - with American forces treated like the liberators they were.

But according to Fox News Channel war historian Oliver North, not every conquered German welcomed the American occupation with open arms.

On Monday North detailed the little-known truth about the post-World War II U.S. experience to ABC radio host Sean Hannity:

"From May 8, 1945 until June 1946, over a thousand Americans and their dependents were killed by German terrorists," he explained, while discussing his new book, "War Stories II: Heroism in the Pacific."

So, how did the U.S. eventually quell the violence?

"General Eisenhower went to [interim German leader] Konrad Adenauer, the guy we hand-picked to run the new government," said North. "And he told him, 'You either stop this or we'll get a new guy to run this country.'"

Adenauer prompty contacted the Wermacht and told them to take care of the problem at all costs, using former SS troops if necessary.


"It wasn't pretty," said North. "There were no trials - nobody was brought before tribunals or anything like that. The German army just went out and took care of it. And the killing stopped."

Added North, "I think that's probably what's going to happen in Iraq."
 

henrymiller

Monkey
May 4, 2002
290
0
Denver-A-Go-Go
Seems as if Oli North needs to do some more research.

Nazi Terrorist? = Werwolf or Werewolf

Brief history of the movement;

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1373/is_10_50/ai_66157021

The seminal work on the topic of Werwolf’s:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0802008623/ref=cm_custrec_gl_acc/104-1284776-9877558?v=glance&s=books

Details how there were less then 50 ALLIED deaths total, not American deaths after occupation.

Our Allies were France, England etc...

An Ally is not a dependent.

I would like to see what Mr. North considers a dependent?

Official United States Army Publication on the matter:

The U.S. Army in the Occupation of Germany 1944-1946

http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/wwii/Occ-GY/

This work has nothing about how “over a thousand Americans and their dependents were killed by German terrorists”

Please look, or show it to Mr. North.

Would an official United States Army document lie?
 

TheInedibleHulk

Turbo Monkey
May 26, 2004
1,886
0
Colorado
I think the scale of the conflist needs to be take into account here. 1000 postwar deaths was a very small percentage of the total losses in WWII. The death rate in Iraq has barely dropped off since "Mission Accomplished". Anyone who's still trying to argue that this war is over is a fool.