Quantcast

Are top of the line bikes going way out of price?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mike B.

Turbo Monkey
Oct 5, 2001
1,522
0
State College, PA
binary visions said:
No, I don't agree.

You are buying at the absolute bleeding edge of the sport. This is very unlike, say, motocross bikes. With motocross bikes, the bike a pro is riding is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in development and showcases technology that simply cannot be bought for any amount of money.

For $5k, you can ride the exact same bike Sam Hill rode to a world cup championship. For a (relatively) affordable price, you can buy everything that Ned Overend had on his uber light XC bike. For a few hundred dollars you can buy the bleeding edge in crank technology from Shimano. These things are simply not available in many other sports.

The fact is, for $250 you can have an extremely capable, durable hardtail from your LBS. Just because you're looking to spend at the top 10-15% doesn't mean they're overpriced :)
:stupid: Except you can't buy the wheels Ned has on his bike right now because I won't sell them to you :sneaky:

Economies of scale and cutting edge products have the biggest impact.
 

maxyedor

<b>TOOL PRO</b>
Oct 20, 2005
5,496
3,141
In the bathroom, fighting a battle
cadmus said:
So - you're saying these are the same bike and didn't require any additional design, testing, or changes to manufacturing specs?

2006 Stinky Deluxe:
http://www.konaworld.com/Prod/000000312/2K6_STINKYDLX_1300.jpg

2005 Stinky Dee-luxe:
http://www.konaworld.com/Prod/000000110/2K5_StinkyDlx_Side-xl.jpg

Jeep has made the Grand Cherokee for years, but the 2006 model is significantly different from the 1996 model - but its the same line. Kona might offer the same models every year, which builds familiarity, but they are different every year....
Those two bikes are different, but I'll bet you a nickle the 2004 stinky and 2005 stinky are almost identical. I'll bet you another nickle that the Jeep GCs from 1996-2006 anre not 10 completley different cars, in fact I would be suprised if anything on the Chassis has changed at all.
 

cadmus

Monkey
May 24, 2006
755
0
PNW
maxyedor said:
I'll bet you another nickle that the Jeep GCs from 1996-2006 are not 10 completley different cars, in fact I would be suprised if anything on the Chassis has changed at all.
Doesn't this support my argument? Reusing a proven design saves costs on future products.

thanks
 

face

Monkey
Sep 14, 2005
209
0
northern utah
cadmus said:
I think bike prices would come down considerably if they took some pointers from the auto industry. Auto manufacturers don't come out with a new model every year, they change body styles etc about every 4th year. There is little different between my 2005 Jeep and the 2006 model. I'm not sure if this it true in the moto world or not, likely it is.

If bike manufacturers weren't so concerned about having a new line each year, they could save tons of money in many areas - R&D, Marketing, Manufacturing, etc. By selling the same/similar model for more than one year, they would have longer to recoup the costs sunk into developing said model, thus lowering the required margin per unit. Unfortunately, all manufacturers (or at least many) would need to subscribe to this business plan or they would be viewed as non-innovative and behind the curve (I can see the MBA articles now). Too bad, expecially for the consumer.
that is true but i think that the sport is changing so fast that if you get behind in frame design or anything else. whilst your competitors surge ahead you'd be behind for that year and years to come granted kona has had their general frame design for many years but they change it yearly with new pivot points even specialized's fsr for the enduro is quite different for 2007. but the technology changes so quickly in this sport, (vpp, fsr platform shocks disc brakes) i mean a downhill bike in year 2000 is practically obsolete, compared to a year 2000 car. i bet it would seem like a new car to half of us. its kinda like manitou and fox. propedal blew spv out of the water and now manitou seems to be behind in market share.

oh and yeah i was wondering this too how much does a tubeset cost for a bike i mean sx frame only is 1700 does anyone have info on markup and much it cost to assemble a frame, paint and ship.

i dont feel like im being ripped off and that when you drop 2-4 grand on bike you get what you pay for. i have been quite pleased with my high end bike
 

Upgr8r

High Priest or maybe Jedi Master
May 2, 2006
941
0
Ventura, CA
N8 said:
Besides someone has to buy the newest top of the line bikes that fuel the used bike market.
Thats how I got my SGS. As I'm new to the whole bike scene I was talked out of buying a higher end bike as it would be WAY beyond my skill level. As I gat better I may upgrade bikes, not just change for changes sake, but to get more enjoyment as I (hopefully) become a better rider
 

DH biker

Turbo Monkey
Dec 12, 2004
1,185
0
North East
Chunky Munkey said:
And to ask for example $3200 for a Trek Session 10 or Randall Scott $4,600 or an Intense M3 for $6,000 dollars or over!? I mean c'mon you got to be kidding me!

A Honda CR 125 runs $5000 and a CR-250 runs $5500 with a motor that does 70mph in a couple seconds, has a TEN times better forks and shocks, with ten times better travel, has a LOT more time put into it in production and has components that would cost a HELL of a lot more than ANY mountainbike, so I ask you, aren't bike manufacturers getting a little bit out of touch with reality when they ask $3200 to $6500 or a mountainbike?

Please, post opinions. It's a dicussion, not a bitch rant post so be constructive. I really want to know, is it all just profit greed or justification of the cost. I mean even shipping a Jap bike to American is included in the cost so why the huge bike price tag over the past few years in hikes to exhorbitant prices that make it a joke to buy a bike when you can buy a motocross bike and have twice as much fun and jump a hell of a lot farther and higher.

Does anyone see my point and agree?
Although yes, I do agree with you on this and yes the sport is too expensive and the little guy just can't afford it.

But from another point of view:

Buy a $6,000 mountain bike and you could compete with the pros assuming you have the skills.

Buy a $6,000 dirtbike and you have not a chance on the pros or even many of the ameratures.

To compete on a pro level of motocross you should ideally have a $60,000- $120,000 bike. The front suspension alone should be worth about $10,000 or more... this is why unless you are a full facotry rider, it is almost impossible to win the main.
 

Toshi

Harbinger of Doom
Oct 23, 2001
38,249
7,695
cadmus said:
So - you're saying these are the same bike and didn't require any additional design, testing, or changes to manufacturing specs?

2006 Stinky Deluxe:
http://www.konaworld.com/Prod/000000312/2K6_STINKYDLX_1300.jpg

2005 Stinky Dee-luxe:
http://www.konaworld.com/Prod/000000110/2K5_StinkyDlx_Side-xl.jpg

Jeep has made the Grand Cherokee for years, but the 2006 model is significantly different from the 1996 model - but its the same line. Kona might offer the same models every year, which builds familiarity, but they are different every year....
so the main triangle changed a tiny bit and the rocker arm grew some speed holes. no, i doubt that that much engineering know-how went into the change or the testing. hardly the same as comparing successive generations of jeeps or the like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.