Quantcast

VP-Free vs Uzzi VPX

Jayridesacove

Turbo Monkey
Feb 21, 2004
1,335
0
Falls Church, VA
I'm certain a similar question was brought up before.

From memory, the intense seems to have a more race bike feel to the ride. The vp free felt more comfortable with typical "freeriding."
 

punkassean

Turbo Monkey
Feb 3, 2002
4,561
0
SC, CA
I'd probably go VP-Free. I just think it looks sexier. They are both sick bikes though. I think the VPX DT looks to chunky and same for the 1.5HT. The VPF looks more elegant and swoopy. Since they both seem to perform well IMO the winner is chosen by the esthetics.
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,653
1,128
NORCAL is the hizzle
I'm a biased SCB 'ho, but vp-free all the way. Been rockin' mine for more than a year and have not had one problem - except my inability to approach the bike's potential! :p I haven't ridden a VPX so I can't say how the ride compares, but I don't have one complaint with my free. Unless you can't live without 1.5 get a vp-free. It makes me funny in the pants just thinking about it. :heart: :heart: :heart:
 

ncrider

Turbo Monkey
Aug 15, 2004
1,564
0
Los Angeles
OGRipper said:
It makes me funny in the pants just thinking about it. :heart: :heart: :heart:
Oh good, I'm glad thats not just me. i can't wait to ride mine as soon as I get off work today.
 

descender

Chimp
May 6, 2003
90
0
San Francisco
They are way different geomerty wise. Study the numbers and compare to other bikes you have been on. Also search as this has come up lots of times.

I vote free but I am sure you will love either.
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,653
1,128
NORCAL is the hizzle
Geometry, shmeometry, just get a free or forever wish you did!

Oh god, now I sound like a hope or avy cult member. I mean, uh, yes, be sure you carefully study the objective differences and make a prudent decision based a thorough examination of all relevent factors.... ;)
 

dlb

Monkey
Apr 15, 2004
202
0
socal
The Intense has more "user freindly geometry" for more trail riding conditions. Has more of an upright seatpost which makes raised post, and climbing conditions a little easier. The Free is still a fine bike, probably one of the best big "go huck yourself" frames on the market. The VPX can take the big hit, on the other hand will make tight trails a little easier, might be a better cornering bike too, also has a shorter wheelbase.
 

TheMontashu

Pourly Tatteued Jeu
Mar 15, 2004
5,549
0
I'm homeless
I would go with the intense, I have some time on one and they feel alot more like a DH bike than a VP-fee does. it is going to feel more like a DH bike but still pedal well with the 7 inches of travel, and 7 inches is plenty for anything you are oging to be doing for a while
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,653
1,128
NORCAL is the hizzle
Does anyone know anything about the shock rate curve on the Uzzi? Won't the the shock mounting on the top tube v. the down tube mount on the vp-free give a different curve? The free has a falling initial rate to give a boost on jumps (rising rebound). I'm not too good at determining rate from looking at a bike but does the uzzi have more of a flat to rising rate? Wouldn't that make it arguably better in the high speed rough stuff but harder to get off the ground, closer to a race bike? So preference should depend on what you plan to use it for...any thoughts?
 

dlb

Monkey
Apr 15, 2004
202
0
socal
OGRipper said:
Does anyone know anything about the shock rate curve on the Uzzi? Won't the the shock mounting on the top tube v. the down tube mount on the vp-free give a different curve? The free has a falling initial rate to give a boost on jumps (rising rebound). I'm not too good at determining rate from looking at a bike but does the uzzi have more of a flat to rising rate? Wouldn't that make it arguably better in the high speed rough stuff but harder to get off the ground, closer to a race bike? So preference should depend on what you plan to use it for...any thoughts?

I dont know much about the "cruves" of the suspension myself, there was some talk about this on mtbr and some of the guy's were saying that the setup on the Intense would make it plusher on the smaller hits.
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
Well after the complaints from the DH forum about the VPX, I would say the VP-Free is the winner here.

The only advantage I see for Intense is that the VPX has a 1.5 headtube, which gives you the option to use a Sherman Breakout.
 

dlb

Monkey
Apr 15, 2004
202
0
socal
My seatpost goes in no problems, slammed all the way down. I had a simular problem with my new Turner 6 Pack, there was a slight bur where the top tube met the seat tube on the welding port, after I hit it with a file the post went in smoothly. I dont see any problem spots on my small VPX.
 

Peete

Turbo Monkey
May 5, 2002
1,054
0
just south of the ATL
Kind of backing up Cal. I rode an Uzzi VPX at Sea Otter on the DS course. I was amazed with it's manuverability through the gates and how well it pedalled out of the gate. I was very impressed. I've been riding an Uzzi SLX since 2001 and will probably get something new this winter. I'm looking real hard at the VP Free mainly for the price and availability.
I'd go with whichever one you can get the cheapest.
 

hooples3

Fuggetaboutit!
Mar 14, 2005
5,245
0
Brooklyn
I was recently looking for a new freeride/dh bike and considered the VP-free and the VPX. I have ridden the vp-free and really liked it ( sc is a great company , i already own a heckler). I never got a chance to test out the VPX cause not to many ppl stock it. Fortunatly I got a chance to ride the 7point7, as soon as I got on it it just felt right, I wound up being able to buy it at an awesome price. The bike is really nice, just something to think about
 
L

LFB

Guest
I like my VPX. It handles extremely well, and excells at everything I want it to do. The free is alright, but I didn't care for it as much. Maybe it's because I used to be a BMXer and I like bikes that are responsive.
 

powderboy

Monkey
Jan 16, 2002
258
0
See Dar Hills, OOTah
I've ridden both the VPX and the VP-Free and I'd agree with what's been said. The VP-Free is a bit more plush on the down, but is more of a pig going up. The VPX is a better overall trailbike though. They both look about the same to me... in the end you'll like either one. It all depends on what you want do do with it and how you ride. Check out my reviews of each:

Intense VPX
http://www.feedthehabit.com/gear_reviews/intense_uzzi_vpx_review.html

SC VPFree
http://www.feedthehabit.com/gear_reviews/2004_santa_cruz_vpfree.html
 

habitatxskate

blah blah blah
Mar 22, 2005
943
0
i have seen a few vp frees they seem sick, my buddy has a uzzi, they are sick and he told me they have sick peddeling effiency depends if you are going for flat/freerdide or dh, if you do freeride get an uzzi if you go dh and freeride go vp
 

powderboy

Monkey
Jan 16, 2002
258
0
See Dar Hills, OOTah
habitatxskate said:
i have seen a few vp frees they seem sick, my buddy has a uzzi, they are sick and he told me they have sick peddeling effiency depends if you are going for flat/freerdide or dh, if you do freeride get an uzzi if you go dh and freeride go vp
So, overall, they are pretty sick! :thumb:

Just giving you a hard time... they are both sick bikes.
 

vpsaline

Monkey
Feb 11, 2006
103
0
OGRipper said:
Does anyone know anything about the shock rate curve on the Uzzi?



Dont forget the Uzzi VPX uses a 8.5 x 2.5 shock, and the VP-Free uses a 8.75 x 2.75 shock.
 

freeridermtb4

Monkey
Aug 27, 2005
132
0
vp free is the lightest dh bike Ive ever picked up or ridden ever, my friend has one and it blew my mind how light it was
 

erikkellison

Monkey
Jan 28, 2004
918
0
Denver, CO
The vertical axis obviously represents the leverage ratio. Or maybe not obviously, but I'm pretty sure that's it, especially since the units appear to be mm/mm, which is really unitless - what a leverage ratio would be, though it would be measured in mm/mm.
I think there must be lighter DH rigs, it all depends on your build. Put an air shock on the VP-Free though, or at least a Ti spring, and I'm sure that helps!

One question: I'm not sure how the falling rate leverage ratio is supposed to help with jumps, anyone care to explain? I would think that a rising rate would make jumps better because that way you wouldn't be so prone to blow through the travel on the g-out part of the ramp. And doesn't a falling rate of leverage at the end really make a bike easier to bottom out, or does the compression and bottom out air volume compensate for this, and make it still ramp up nicely? I am an owner of a VP-Free w/ a Roco, but a new owner. On that note, anyone care to share how they have their Roco set up? I weigh 185, spring is a 450, rebound is all the way in, compression all the way out, 200psi. Not sure if it's supposed to feel better. It feels good, I just want another opinion.
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,653
1,128
NORCAL is the hizzle
erikkellison said:
One question: I'm not sure how the falling rate leverage ratio is supposed to help with jumps, anyone care to explain?
Falling compression = rising rebound. Once you recognize that and learn to work it, you get a sweet boost off jumps. Pumping off transitions is way easier on a free than say, on a V10, and it's not just because of a little less travel. If you don't get it, you might think your bike kicks too much and run too much rebound.