Quantcast

Steve's TPC+ Rockitou Doroxxer

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
So a few of you would have read Udi's shimmed Boxxer thread, this is basically a similar thing, though instead it's a full TPC+ conversion rather than a home-made compression assembly. Basically the reason for doing this stems from a few issues with the stock Motion Control (Moco) damping. First of all and most importantly, the rebound damping is pretty crap - ported rebound means you have to run it quite fast for it to track well, which then makes it very fast in the top part of the stroke. The Moco LSC/floodgate adjustment provide a pretty useful compression damper in the sense that you can run tons of LSC without too much harshness, but there is another issue here - you can't fine tune properly because the range of adjustment is way too big for how far you're turning the LSC knob. Even with the blue ano knob removed (no detents) like I've had mine for ages, it's very hard to get the LSC bang on, because moving it even 1 degree substantially affects the amount of damping. On top of this, because of the way the Moco damper works, there is a bit of a "dead zone" before the damping kicks in, for better or for worse. And last but not least, you can't tune the high speed curve at all, only its blow-off threshold in the form of the floodgate. TPC+ solves all of those problems.

I've had shimmed rebound running in the Boxxer (first using my own piston, later using a Manitou one) for about 6 months or so now, only recently did I get around to completing the compression assembly to match. It's in a workable form right now but the shim stacks in the compression assembly need tuning because frankly they're way too light (and I'd already added a few shims from the stock setup, the original setup must have had between zero and f**k all damping).

This conversion is made possible because of a lot of similarities between the RS and Manitou gear (at least from the TPC+ Sherman I ripped my spares out of). The general layout of the damper is obviously the same, and the rebound assemblies are very similar. The rebound pistons share the same ID, as do the check valve shims, and all 3 of the Manitou pistons in the TPC+ damper are actually the same as far as I can see, which is handy if you're pilfering spares. The OD of the Manitou pistons with glide rings is a bit bigger than the RS stuff, which indicates thicker stanchions in the Boxxer than the Sherman (as both have a 32mm OD).

The rebound assembly was made by modifying a plastic Manitou TPC+ rebound piston. This involves taking off the axial flange on the ID, and countersinking the hole a bit because the piston height is a bit bigger than the RS one - the countersinking allows it to sit down a bit further on the rebound shaft, which means you get more thread insertion on the locknut. This is necessary (as is loctite!) because, as I found out during my race run on the weekend, the nut holding it all together can come off pretty easily otherwise. Doing 2/3rds of a race run with no rebound damping and some hardcore topout is not cool at all (anyone who was watching at Eildon probably saw/heard this!), so if you decide to make yourself one of the rebound pistons like this, do it all properly. I also filed the faces down so the total thickness was 8.0mm instead of the original 8.4 or so, and used the Manitou locknut because the RS one is pretty silly. The rebound piston OD is also turned down to 25.20mm (I think the stanchion ID is probably 25.4mm ie 1" but I haven't been able to measure it accurately) and run without a glide ring or o-rings - this is because it's nylon and acts as its own lubricated glide ring anyway. You can probably go for a slightly tighter tolerance (maybe as high as 25.30mm) but the 25.20mm works well regardless. For reference, the OD of a Rockshox rebound piston incl glide ring was, as best as I could measure, 25.18mm. The glide ring also has a split in it which allows some oil through, so the tolerance isn't tight to begin with.

The compression assembly... now this was a bit of a bastard thing. Manitou, being Manitou, decided that it was a great idea to mix metric, imperial, and custom sized threads. Manitou top caps don't have the same thread as Boxxer ones, so I modified a Boxxer top cap and create a threaded insert for it, which was bonded in. Naturally, being Manitou, the thread for the main shaft to screw into the top cap wasn't a 12mm, nor was it a normal 1/2" UNF - it was a 1/2" by 24tpi which is not a recognised size, so it's obviously custom cut - you bastards Manitou. I then made up a brass extender for the assembly, that threaded into the topcap insert, because the stock TPC+ comp assembly was about 70mm shorter than the MoCo cart it was going to replace. This was then bonded to the outside of the original main shaft, I had to cut off the bit that threaded into the original top cap in order to do this. This meant that the internal adjuster needle was too short, so I cut down a length of 4mm allen key, cut up a super cheap 4mm socket head (you shouldn't be able to get through tool steel with a blunt hacksaw at all, let alone as quick as that - that's what you get when you buy a 40pc socket set for $7.20!) and bonded the length of 4mm hex rod to the original top cap adjuster rod. The top cap is sealed up with the same o-rings as the original one was, so hopefully there won't be any problems there.

Sooo... only put it together tonight. Quick test ride reveals that it's extremely smooth but lacking low speed compression damping even with the LSC turned right in, so the shim stacks are too light. Predicted issues are mainly to do with sealing and initial contamination of oil from whatever swarf and stuff wasn't completely cleaned out of the bits I made up.

Big thanks to my boss for spending way too much time helping me out with the machining, giving good practical advice, and letting me use his tools! Also many thanks to Udi for kicking me up the arse enough times to actually get the thing done, cos I just kept putting it off for months on end. All told, this should be more or less the ultimate DH fork once it's dialled in, especially once I get an air leg for it - lightweight, smooth, and well damped.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

ire

Turbo Monkey
Aug 6, 2007
6,196
4
I wish I had skills :disgust: I guess I'll have to stick with stock products
 

Rick205

Monkey
Jun 20, 2006
200
0
If you ever have time, it would be great if you could put together a guide for the rebound side - the compression side maybe requires too much modification for most but the rebound is do-able for many.

Great work though, i have just got my boxxer WC and wouldnt mind doing the rebound modification.

Rick
 

big cal

Monkey
Nov 18, 2001
177
0
Melbourne, Australia
Well i just like the name! haha Nice work steve!

I wanna ask, do you think the new boxxer is going to surpass this? Obviously the custom shim tuning is going to be more dialed for you, but have you tried the mission control in the Totems? How do you find them?

When i finally get my DH bike on the road again i will let you play with my 40, i just need a ride first!
 

William42

fork ways
Jul 31, 2007
3,916
651
rad, now if only you could find a way to stuff that in the new 35 mm stantions of the new boxxer WC's, I'd buy one specifically so you could mod it.

fuggin beautiful
 

Udi

RM Chief Ornithologist
Mar 14, 2005
4,915
1,200
Nice work, that looks neat as!

My biggest worry would be that the LSC port size is too large even with the adjuster fully closed, it's definitely something I noticed with the TPC+ comp assembly I used to make mine anyway. If you just add shims it may end up having too much HSC and still barely enough LSC, whereas a smaller port will let you get a better curve. The fun part will be doing that and still having your adjuster working as intended... I'm interested in seeing developments. :)

Edit - unless the adjuster lets you close the port completely like the manitou rebound shaft... is that how yours is?
 
Last edited:

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
Well i just like the name! haha Nice work steve!

I wanna ask, do you think the new boxxer is going to surpass this? Obviously the custom shim tuning is going to be more dialed for you, but have you tried the mission control in the Totems? How do you find them?

When i finally get my DH bike on the road again i will let you play with my 40, i just need a ride first!
I've tried Totems briefly but honestly without playing with stuff for days/weeks, I can't tell you how good it is. It felt ok but maybe a tad too progressive. Hopefully the new Boxxer will match this, on paper it should actually be better in some ways (high/low speed rebound adjust, high/low speed comp adjust - I only have low speed of each).

rad, now if only you could find a way to stuff that in the new 35 mm stantions of the new boxxer WC's, I'd buy one specifically so you could mod it.

fuggin beautiful
hahah hopefully you won't need to do that! The new Boxxer looks pretty trick man, I think it'll be a while before I find anything that needs significant modification in something that complex. On paper at least, it looks like you should be able to set it up pretty well however you like just using the external adjustments.

Nice work, that looks neat as!

My biggest worry would be that the LSC port size is too large even with the adjuster fully closed, it's definitely something I noticed with the TPC+ comp assembly I used to make mine anyway. If you just add shims it may end up having too much HSC and still barely enough LSC, whereas a smaller port will let you get a better curve. The fun part will be doing that and still having your adjuster working as intended... I'm interested in seeing developments. :)

Edit - unless the adjuster lets you close the port completely like the manitou rebound shaft... is that how yours is?
Right now it doesn't have enough LSC, nor does it have any significant amount of HSC, even with 9 assorted shims on it (vs the stock Manitou 3 haha - the thing must have had zero damping beforehand). Just from looking through the side windows of the thing, I'd say it can completely close (or very close to), it certainly bottoms on something anyway. Next time I have it in pieces (whenever the shims arrive) I'll check for sure.

Initial ride report - got a day of real DHing on it today (yes DH on a Wednesday... can you tell I'm avoiding uni work?). It doesn't have enough LSC, point blank, though there's no excess of HSC either, no spiking or anything, it's smooth as all hell (probably also due to the fresh oil, freshly cleaned lowers, fresh seal grease etc). The rebound is certainly nice though, it tracks extremely well and jumps nicely even with the rebound slowed down a bit from how I had the stock Boxxer rebound set up. Ordered some more shims to continue working on the compression stack, will see what happens once that's done.
 
Last edited:
May 25, 2006
62
0
If you ever have time, it would be great if you could put together a guide for the rebound side - the compression side maybe requires too much modification for most but the rebound is do-able for many.

Great work though, i have just got my boxxer WC and wouldnt mind doing the rebound modification.

Rick
I second that, except I would love to see a guide for the compression cart as well. It's a bit much to follow from the post, but perhaps with more than a quick read it would be alright.

I can't wait to hear how this works out, full-on TPC+ in my Boxxer would awesome! Also curious to know how the performance compares to Udi's setup.
 

Cave Dweller

Monkey
May 6, 2003
993
0
Nice work steve.

I share your pain re: the weird threads. I had the same problems when i put the dorado internals into the monster T. The other thing that **** me was between the xvert carbon and dorado the internal honing was a different size, top caps between the two forks had different thread sizes and the list goes on of non standard sizing between forks. Bit of a pain, i couldn't even put the dorado internals into an xvert carbon chassis let alone a boxxer......

Plus, its not really a doroxxer, more a boxxaman, your missing the spring loaded floating bladder piston thing the tpc+ dorados had :clue:

My dorado or xvert didn't ever have the kind of LSC you can get from a boxxer. One thing you might want to try, although i don't really know enough about the tpc workings to be sure. On the dorado the bottom piston on the tpc setup could be placed in three positions with a circlip, (with around 5-6mm of adjustment approx). I gather it either preloaded the spring (meaning more force to push it up before exposing the bypass, probably not seeing the spring is small as) or increased the distance the piston need to be moved before bypass. Maybe a stiffer spring in there would help get a bit more LSC? Its kind of like turning the blue MC knob, requiring a greater force to blow off and open the bypass?
 

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
I second that, except I would love to see a guide for the compression cart as well. It's a bit much to follow from the post, but perhaps with more than a quick read it would be alright.

I can't wait to hear how this works out, full-on TPC+ in my Boxxer would awesome! Also curious to know how the performance compares to Udi's setup.
Yeah no worries, at some stage I'll put together a guide to the TPC rebound at least. The compression is more involved and it would vary a lot depending on where you got your TPC+ damper from (eg the Dorado one is different to the Sherman one I have etc) so I'll probably give that a miss other than to explain the basics.

Nice work steve.

I share your pain re: the weird threads. I had the same problems when i put the dorado internals into the monster T. The other thing that **** me was between the xvert carbon and dorado the internal honing was a different size, top caps between the two forks had different thread sizes and the list goes on of non standard sizing between forks. Bit of a pain, i couldn't even put the dorado internals into an xvert carbon chassis let alone a boxxer......

Plus, its not really a doroxxer, more a boxxaman, your missing the spring loaded floating bladder piston thing the tpc+ dorados had :clue:

My dorado or xvert didn't ever have the kind of LSC you can get from a boxxer. One thing you might want to try, although i don't really know enough about the tpc workings to be sure. On the dorado the bottom piston on the tpc setup could be placed in three positions with a circlip, (with around 5-6mm of adjustment approx). I gather it either preloaded the spring (meaning more force to push it up before exposing the bypass, probably not seeing the spring is small as) or increased the distance the piston need to be moved before bypass. Maybe a stiffer spring in there would help get a bit more LSC? Its kind of like turning the blue MC knob, requiring a greater force to blow off and open the bypass?
haha yeah it's not quite a dorado/boxxer hybrid, but the only reason the Dorito needed the IFP was cos it was inverted. All the right-way up ones don't need it because the air naturally sits above the compression assembly anyway.

I'm pretty sure the Dorado is based on the same setup as this, but in the Sherman TPC+ damper, basically what the moving compression piston does is move freely with the oil until enough oil has been displaced (at a rate high enough that it didn't all just go through the LS bleed) during a compression hit, that the piston hits the stop. Once the piston hits the stop, the oil is forced to go through it by opening the shims, rather than simply moving the piston. The idea is that this allows good damping control of the bigger hits without being overdamped for small-displacement hits of any speed. The downside is that it contributes to a similar dead zone of low damping like the Boxxer has, unless the fixed piston is appropriately shimmed. It certainly provides a range of tuning options anyway.
 

Udi

RM Chief Ornithologist
Mar 14, 2005
4,915
1,200
edit - snaked! grr

The bladder/floating piston are only used in the dorado to separate air from oil, because unlike the correctly oriented forks, gravity doesn't do the job in the invert.

The TPC+ system is basically a two-stage compression damper, and that spring you speak of (+ its three different preload settings) essentially just controls how much travel you get from the fork before extra damping kicks in from the second piston (so in fact it's the complete opposite of blowoff). I don't think steve's cartridge has those 3 settings because it's from a shorter travel fork and the piston has less travel.

Anyway my take on that personally is that it's probably not the greatest system in the world, it worked fine on the dorado because the maximum amount of LSC while noticeable wasn't that great. When running a fair bit of LSC on the other hand (like these custom setups usually end up doing :)) I reckon there would be a tendency for the two-stage thing to just limit you using full travel, and possibly induce spiking deeper in the stroke.

You can pretty easily just un-shim the lower stack and lose the position sensitive thing though.
 

Cave Dweller

Monkey
May 6, 2003
993
0
haha yeah it's not quite a dorado/boxxer hybrid, but the only reason the Dorito needed the IFP was cos it was inverted. All the right-way up ones don't need it because the air naturally sits above the compression assembly anyway.
Off course.

But i also thought is was there so no oil mixxed with air increasing performance? If bleed properly there should be no air mixxing with the oil inside the dorado.

Its like a rear shock, separate the air from the oil. Air and oil mix leads to loss of performance and consistency right? Right way up forks still supper from air/oil mixxing don't they?

I'm pretty sure the Dorado is based on the same setup as this, but in the Sherman TPC+ damper, basically ......... etc
Ahh..... so the floating piston is more for high speed, and the fixxed is more low speed? With the adjustment needle controlling the point one switch's over to the other?
 

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
Off course.

But i also thought is was there so no oil mixxed with air increasing performance? If bleed properly there should be no air mixxing with the oil inside the dorado.

Its like a rear shock, separate the air from the oil. Air and oil mix leads to loss of performance and consistency right? Right way up forks still supper from air/oil mixxing don't they?



Ahh..... so the floating piston is more for high speed, and the fixxed is more low speed? With the adjustment needle controlling the point one switch's over to the other?

I've never noticed any inconsistency from supposed foaming. Theoretically it could happen but the oil volume below the compression assembly is pressurised anyway, I can't see it being a huge problem. Of course separating them won't be a BAD thing, I just don't see it as being necessarily required - there are plenty of open-bath forks that have no problems.

Rear shocks need to be sealed and pressurised because they operate at a considerable pressure difference to forks (like 3x higher) and because especially with a piggyback, there isn't a particular direction that you can orient the thing where air can't get into the damper's swept volume.

Yeah the floating piston is like extra high speed damping that only kicks in after a certain piston displacement (on the Doritos/Kingpins it's quite a long way, on the Shermans it's only like 30mm of displacement). The fixed piston affects damping across the entire speed/displacement range, and the LSC needle adjusts across the entire range as well. The "threshold" where the moving piston kicks in is determined by how far the moving piston travels before it stops (hence the adjustable circlip or whatever it was on the Doritos), nothing to do with the needle adjuster.
 
Last edited:

Nixxk

Chimp
Jun 11, 2006
21
2
Is the TPC+ in the Sherman or Kingpin you are using the same as the old Xvert Carbon ?
 
May 25, 2006
62
0
Yeah no worries, at some stage I'll put together a guide to the TPC rebound at least. The compression is more involved and it would vary a lot depending on where you got your TPC+ damper from (eg the Dorado one is different to the Sherman one I have etc) so I'll probably give that a miss other than to explain the basics.
Sounds good! Though a guide for compression I think could help regardless of where you got your TPC+ damper from. I know it will be a different process from one to another, but it would give some nice detail and show ways of doing things, and if someone is lucky and has the same version, then it is perfectly simple for them. Either way, any information is great and the basics are definitely the most important. :)

Do you think it would be any harder to retrofit the cartridge from a Dorado? I still have to find a donor fork and it could be fun to get a Dorado cheap, run it for a bit, and then butcher it if I think the Boxxer chassis and air spring would be better.
 

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
Is the TPC+ in the Sherman or Kingpin you are using the same as the old Xvert Carbon ?
Probably functionally, but the X-vert Carbon had 30mm stanchions so the assemblies certainly wouldn't be interchangeable. The X-vert Carbon stuff might actually be easier to adapt to work with a Boxxer because it's smaller to start with though - you might be able to get it to seal a Boxxer stanchion with an o-ring or something instead of running the piston directly on the stanchion.

Sounds good! Though a guide for compression I think could help regardless of where you got your TPC+ damper from. I know it will be a different process from one to another, but it would give some nice detail and show ways of doing things, and if someone is lucky and has the same version, then it is perfectly simple for them. Either way, any information is great and the basics are definitely the most important. :)

Do you think it would be any harder to retrofit the cartridge from a Dorado? I still have to find a donor fork and it could be fun to get a Dorado cheap, run it for a bit, and then butcher it if I think the Boxxer chassis and air spring would be better.
Yeah I'll do a compression guide too if you guys are keen. No one part of it is actually all that hard, it's just getting it ALL to line up without f**king anything irreplaceable that is difficult :)

Dunno about the Dorito - might be easier, might be harder. It has the IFP separating the air from the oil as previously mentioned, which you might want to remove or whatever so that you don't have to bleed the thing.

I take apart the new catrigde today.

I realize (comparing with my ex 06) that my new one has this following difference :


- The seal on the bottom out is black . (before it was red)

- The spring on the by-pass valve is much stiff than the old one

- The spring is on the HSC valve is gold color. =) Very nice.


I put a stiff shim on the HSC stack next to the shims that was already there.

I thought that maybe with that I could have a better compression feeling.


So, I rebuilt the catrigde, and...****in, NOW the FOX hasn't ANY movement with the LSC almost close. Is fairly close to the LSC that my ex Boxxer 08 provides me.

MUCH better right now. I'm riding with a linear spring, so, the feeling on this moment is just GREAT.

Thanks.

I will test it tomorrow a little more.
haha that's awesome. How does the HSC feel?
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,098
1,144
NC
I moved the Fox 40 posts to a new thread since these are both enormously useful threads and I want them to be search-able and separate.

Thanks for the suggestion Socket :thumb:
 

Npdh

Monkey
Apr 29, 2007
141
0
I like the feel of tpc+ and I like the idea of being able to mod my damper
The mission control damper is quite tuneable also. And the rebound is already shimmed.

I did dissamble one of a Totem time ago. If the new boxxer will be similar, it isn't to complicated to mod.
 

William42

fork ways
Jul 31, 2007
3,916
651
The mission control damper is quite tuneable also. And the rebound is already shimmed.

I did dissamble one of a Totem time ago. If the new boxxer will be similar, it isn't to complicated to mod.
Don't have much ride time on the mission control damper. Bounced around on it in the parking lot. I'll have to take your word for it I guess, and since I don't really have the money to buy a new fork I guess the point is moot for now :bonk:
 

Npdh

Monkey
Apr 29, 2007
141
0
Don't have much ride time on the mission control damper. Bounced around on it in the parking lot. I'll have to take your word for it I guess, and since I don't really have the money to buy a new fork I guess the point is moot for now :bonk:
The Mission Control seems to be much controled than the Moco development. The rebound feels more effective and less stupid, and the compression feels working as well.

I have some photos on my pc of the MiCo Totem dissamble, but my stupid pc isn't wonrking, maybe later I could upload some photos...

=)

Not big think also, phone cam.
 

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
Thanks a lot !

Any change on the TPC+ yet ?
Not yet, hopefully the shims will arrive today so I can get on with re-shimming it and test it again later this week. Will be sure to let you know how it goes. I'll also put together a guide to TPC+ conversion for anyone who's interested in a couple of weeks.
 
May 25, 2006
62
0
Not yet, hopefully the shims will arrive today so I can get on with re-shimming it and test it again later this week. Will be sure to let you know how it goes. I'll also put together a guide to TPC+ conversion for anyone who's interested in a couple of weeks.
Awesome, I can't wait!

Maybe this will inspire me to get my old Supernova up and running as well. There might be something wrong with it, but fresh oil and messing with shims couldn't hurt. I think I'm going to have a great winter break! Lots of tinkering to be done. :D

Edit: Granted, I'm not in Australia... but where are you getting your shims from? I'm assuming flat metal disks couldn't cost too much, so it wouldn't hurt to get a nice range of sizes for different projects.
 

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
Awesome, I can't wait!

Maybe this will inspire me to get my old Supernova up and running as well. There might be something wrong with it, but fresh oil and messing with shims couldn't hurt. I think I'm going to have a great winter break! Lots of tinkering to be done. :D

Edit: Granted, I'm not in Australia... but where are you getting your shims from? I'm assuming flat metal disks couldn't cost too much, so it wouldn't hurt to get a nice range of sizes for different projects.
Those Supernovas were supposed to be the bomb, haven't seen one for years though.

I get my shims from Teknik Motorsport (http://www.teknikracing.com/Suspension-Products/Shims), they're actually quite expensive - $4au a pop makes it pretty easy to drop $100 on em! I haven't found anyone else with a good range online though (in Aus at least).
 

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
Update: re-valved the damper, tried quite a few shim combinations to get the right HSC/LSC that I wanted. Worked out a stack using significantly thicker shims than my original stack (all shims at least double the thickness), that provides a fair bit of LSC without excessive HSC harshness. Ride test when I get the chance!
 
May 25, 2006
62
0
Those Supernovas were supposed to be the bomb, haven't seen one for years though.

I get my shims from Teknik Motorsport (http://www.teknikracing.com/Suspension-Products/Shims), they're actually quite expensive - $4au a pop makes it pretty easy to drop $100 on em! I haven't found anyone else with a good range online though (in Aus at least).
The Supernova is definitely a neat fork and I love the carbon fiber, though it did have its own little issues... clearance for adjuster knobs and such. Frankly, it would be awesome to get it running nicely again, even if just to run it on my trail bike for a bit to enjoy the novelty of it.

Yikes, I didn't expect shims to cost that much, but I guess they have to be made quite precisely.

Sounds good, hope this re-shimming works out for you! Would you mind telling your weight, riding style, preferences, etc. along with whatever shim setup you settle on? If I do make this conversion, that could be a great assistance for at least getting the damping set in the right ballpark.
 

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
The Supernova is definitely a neat fork and I love the carbon fiber, though it did have its own little issues... clearance for adjuster knobs and such. Frankly, it would be awesome to get it running nicely again, even if just to run it on my trail bike for a bit to enjoy the novelty of it.

Yikes, I didn't expect shims to cost that much, but I guess they have to be made quite precisely.

Sounds good, hope this re-shimming works out for you! Would you mind telling your weight, riding style, preferences, etc. along with whatever shim setup you settle on? If I do make this conversion, that could be a great assistance for at least getting the damping set in the right ballpark.
I have no doubt you could get them cheaper, especially in the US - all that kind of custom/low-volume stuff is expensive here. There are probably cheaper places in Aus too, but these guys are quick and convenient.

I *think* I've got the compression valving fairly nice at the moment, I'll get a day's real riding on it at some stage soon (only got the gutter test so far) and report back. Rebound valving is better than the stock ported damper, but it still doesn't feel quite as nice as the Fox 40 setup which is my benchmark.
 

djivotno

Monkey
Oct 3, 2008
108
0
Looks like a great work on those boxxers...

I'm pretty interested in the rebound part (the boxxer's MoCo unit works fine for me but the rebound... not realy) So just to find out more before i spent any money on it:

How competable are the rebounds, and can i use the rod from the boxxer with the shimmed unit from say a Kingpin, and... do the FFD dampers have shimmed rebound - i can get a Stance Static on a great deal but i'm not sure how it looks on the inside (I havn't done any work on Manitous, just RS/MZ stuff)?
 

Udi

RM Chief Ornithologist
Mar 14, 2005
4,915
1,200
I think the FFD system does have shimmed rebound (and ported compression), hopefully someone can confirm this for you. The kingpin is a full TPC+ system, cool thing is you'll have three pistons to use (for whatever) as well as that many pistons worth of shims.

I'd suggest trying to find a broken kingpin, I managed to buy two sets of kingpin internals (quite cheap) because the chassis breaks in about 5 places. :)

Edit - and yeah, you do just use the manitou piston (with the boxxer damper shaft, and return valve spring). There's some pics in the third post here: http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/showthread.php?t=208414
 
Last edited:

djivotno

Monkey
Oct 3, 2008
108
0
I think the FFD system does have shimmed rebound (and ported compression), hopefully someone can confirm this for you. The kingpin is a full TPC+ system, cool thing is you'll have three pistons to use (for whatever) as well as that many pistons worth of shims.

I'd suggest trying to find a broken kingpin, I managed to buy two sets of kingpin internals (quite cheap) because the chassis breaks in about 5 places. :)

Edit - and yeah, you do just use the manitou piston (with the boxxer damper shaft, and return valve spring). There's some pics in the third post here: http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/showthread.php?t=208414
I'm hard at work to find used/broken Kingpin, and if not, i can go for a new one. Another thing popped up in my mind and it's shimming the check valve-side on the rebound piston for LSC and regulating the oil level for the progression rate - like on the rear. I'm not sure what will turn up, but it's sure to be better on the scale, i could even add an air cap for some more adjustments :)

Thanks for sharing your work guys :thumb:
 

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
I'm hard at work to find used/broken Kingpin, and if not, i can go for a new one. Another thing popped up in my mind and it's shimming the check valve-side on the rebound piston for LSC and regulating the oil level for the progression rate - like on the rear. I'm not sure what will turn up, but it's sure to be better on the scale, i could even add an air cap for some more adjustments :)

Thanks for sharing your work guys :thumb:
I wouldn't recommend shimming the check valve side of the piston, because if the pressure drop over the rebound piston is greater than the pressure drop over the compression unit, you will get cavitation from the vacuum being drawn between the rebound piston and the seal head.
 
May 25, 2006
62
0
I think the FFD system does have shimmed rebound (and ported compression), hopefully someone can confirm this for you. The kingpin is a full TPC+ system, cool thing is you'll have three pistons to use (for whatever) as well as that many pistons worth of shims.

I'd suggest trying to find a broken kingpin, I managed to buy two sets of kingpin internals (quite cheap) because the chassis breaks in about 5 places. :)

Edit - and yeah, you do just use the manitou piston (with the boxxer damper shaft, and return valve spring). There's some pics in the third post here: http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/showthread.php?t=208414
Awesome, I think I've got a Kingpin lined up! Is there any way to make the kingpin internals externally adjustable (lsc) when I do this mod, or should I just not bother? Would you recommend getting another set of internals if I can? I'm not sure how likely I am to mess them up...

Can't wait until I can actually get my hands on the kingpin, this should be fun!
 

MrPlow

Monkey
Sep 9, 2004
628
0
Toowoomba Queensland
I'm hard at work to find used/broken Kingpin, and if not, i can go for a new one. Another thing popped up in my mind and it's shimming the check valve-side on the rebound piston for LSC and regulating the oil level for the progression rate - like on the rear. I'm not sure what will turn up, but it's sure to be better on the scale, i could even add an air cap for some more adjustments :)

Thanks for sharing your work guys :thumb:
For what it is worth I do not reccomend shimming the brebound piston. I tried this on my fox 40 mod and it ended badly. It caused cavitation in the cartridge ruining rebound damping. and hign internal pressures that eventually pushed the oil out of the fork.
 

Udi

RM Chief Ornithologist
Mar 14, 2005
4,915
1,200
Awesome, I think I've got a Kingpin lined up! Is there any way to make the kingpin internals externally adjustable (lsc) when I do this mod, or should I just not bother? Would you recommend getting another set of internals if I can? I'm not sure how likely I am to mess them up...

Can't wait until I can actually get my hands on the kingpin, this should be fun!
Yeah, I just finished making my externally (LSC) adjustable damper. Mostly kingpin and some rockshox bits. I might update my thread with some pics and details whenever I have some time.

You only need one piston for rebound and one piston for compression (that'll be the best setup IMO) which leaves you one spare in case you mess something up. You will need to source some shims though (for the compression assembly at least, maybe rebound) because the kingpin ones are quite thin and bend a little too easily (= too little damping in mid to HSR and mid to HSC).

Be creative though, come up with your own ideas based on whatever you have in your garage... seems to work best.