Quantcast

Now who's the Nazi/communist/fascist/whatever?

Pesqueeb

bicycle in airplane hangar
Feb 2, 2007
40,381
16,870
Riding the baggage carousel.
More of teh hypocrisy from the Republican Party. I wonder if the irony has struck any of them yet? Or if there is anybody left in the Republican party that knows what irony means? :twitch:
November 23, 2009, 1:32 pm

G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates
By ADAM NAGOURNEY
The battle among Republicans over what the party should stand for — and how much it should accommodate dissenting views on important issues — is probably going to move from the states to the Republican National Committee when it holds its winter meeting this January in Honolulu.

Republican leaders are circulating a resolution listing 10 positions Republican candidates should support to demonstrate that they “espouse conservative principles and public policies” that are in opposition to “Obama’s socialist agenda.” According to the resolution, any Republican candidate who broke with the party on three or more of these issues– in votes cast, public statements made or answering a questionnaire – would be penalized by being denied party funds or the party endorsement.

The proposed resolution was signed by 10 Republican national committee members and was distributed on Monday morning. They are asking for the resolution to be debated when Republicans gather for their winter meeting.

The resolution invokes Ronald Reagan, and noted that Mr. Reagan had said the Republican Party should be devoted to conservative principles but also be open to diverse views. President Reagan believed, the resolution notes, “that someone who agreed with him 8 out of 10 times was his friend, not his opponent.”

Hence the provision calling for cutting off Republicans who agree with the party on seven of 10 items. The resolution demands that Republicans support “smaller government, smaller national deficits and lower taxes,” denial of government funding for abortion, and “victory in Iraq and Afghanistan.” It calls on candidates to oppose amnesty for illegal immigrants and repealing of the Defense of Marriage Act.

The development is going to put pressure on Michael Steele, the party chairman, as he tries to maintain a balance between those in his party who have been saying the road to victory is to include divergent views, and those who say the party needs to embrace conservative principles that have been at its core.

Mr. Steele managed, at his party’s last meeting, to steer clear of potentially contentious resolutions, including one that equated Democrats with socialists.

Gail Gitcho, a spokeswoman for the committee, said it was not clear what Mr. Steele would do.

“The deadline for submitting resolutions for the R.N.C. Winter Meeting is more than 30 days away,” she said. “At this point, we do not what resolutions will be submitted nor what the final language of any resolution ultimately submitted may be.”

Here is the resolution’s list:

(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama’s “stimulus” bill;

(2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run health care;

(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation;

(4) We support workers’ right to secret ballot by opposing card check;

(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;

(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;

(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;

(8) We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act;

(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and

(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/gop-considers-purity-resolution-for-candidates/?src=twt&twt=nytimes

In the spirit of recent tea bagger/birther/rebulitard actions, your history lesson today is of "purity" policies other leaders have put into effect.

Saddam claimed to have found a fifth column within the Ba'ath Party and directed Muhyi Abdel-Hussein to read out a confession and the names of 68 alleged co-conspirators. These members were labelled "disloyal" and were removed from the room one by one and taken into custody. After the list was read, Saddam congratulated those still seated in the room for their past and future loyalty. The 68 people arrested at the meeting were subsequently tried together and found guilty of treason. 22 were sentenced to execution. Other high-ranking members of the party formed the firing squad. By 1 August 1979, hundreds of high-ranking Ba'ath party members had been executed
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam#Rise_to_power

Stalin, as head of the Politburo consolidated near-absolute power in the 1930s with a Great Purge of the party, justified as an attempt to expel 'opportunists' and 'counter-revolutionary infiltrators'. Those targeted by the purge were often expelled from the party, however more severe measures ranged from banishment to the Gulag labor camps, to execution after trials held by NKVD troikas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalin#Purges_and_deportations

While accepting anyone regardless of background into the Khmer Rouge army at this time, Saloth (Pol Pot)greatly increased the requirements for membership in the party. Students and so-called middle peasants were now rejected by the party. Those with clear peasant backgrounds were the preferred recruits for party membership. These restrictions were ironic in that most of the senior party leadership including Saloth came from student and middle peasant backgrounds. They also created an intellectual split between the educated old guard party members and the uneducated peasant new party members.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pol_pot#The_path_to_power_.281969-1975.29

And lest we forget the rights favorite analogy:
Having secured supreme political power, Hitler went on to gain public support by convincing most Germans he was their savior from the economic Depression, the Versailles treaty, communism, the "Judeo-Bolsheviks", and other "undesirable" minorities. The Nazis eliminated opposition through a process known as Gleichschaltung ("bringing into line").
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
54,511
20,306
Sleazattle
Have you ever seen Obama and Hitler in the same room together???







HAVE YOU!?!?!?!?!?




 
Last edited:

dante

Unabomber
Feb 13, 2004
8,807
9
looking for classic NE singletrack
Meh. In my view, it's a pretty moderate, middle-of-the-road document that's designed more to foster party unity by realizing "we're all in this together" than anything that would actually kick someone out of the party. There's no end abortion plank (only a weak "no gov't funding" clause), there's no call for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, and you could be Pro Abortion, Pro Big Government (and pro stimulus), against the surge in Iraq/Afghanistan and pro gay marriage and you'd still be a "good, card-carrying member of the Republican Party".

It's interesting how many of those planks are actually OPPOSING something (gay marriage, funding for abortion, bigger government, immigration, etc) instead of them actually supporting something...
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
24
SF, CA
(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation;
This one is cracking me up, endlessly.

"You keep your government hands off my Medicare!"
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
86,083
24,611
media blackout
So, after re-reading it, it seems like what they want to do is round up all the crazy and keep it in one place. Anyone with rational thought will get the boot. Sounds like a good idea to me.