The jury is still out as to whether it was a Pollock, leaning towards not.
It all looks like crap to me. Not a fan.
I wasn't a Pollack fan until I saw a few in person at the Denver Art Museum, he's no Francis Bacon but I still liked what I saw.
Ditto. i want to get the defamation of time on my shoulderI'm a Dali fan, myself.
I can only imagine the awesomeness my brother could work with something like that.
of course teh Family is going to say that , if they are real it is going to cost them Millions.
Even if you don't like his stuff, it's still hard to argue that it doesn't have a place in photography history. There are some pieces of his that I like, but most of his stuff I would say is just ok. Sure as hell not worth that kind of money....
I think his contributions to the history of the conservation movement and helping to bring the national parks to the public eye are far more significant. It just so happened that he did it via photography.
Agreed...
