Quantcast

Banshee Spitfire Review

-BB-

I broke all the rules, but somehow still became mo
Sep 6, 2001
4,254
28
Livin it up in the O.C.
Well, I was not really sure where this thread should go...

What do you call a bike with a 66degree HT, a long wheelbase and a low BB? A Downhill bike would be my first guess.

But what about a bike with 127mm of travel that climbs like a goat? XC? Trail?

I finally decided to do a quick search and it appears that most of the Spitty threads are here in the DH forum so I decided to post this where the people interested will see it. Plus I'm a mod here, and this is my home turf. ;) So away we go!!


Lets start at the beginning I guess. For the last 6 years I've been riding an Ironhorse MK3... that replaced a 2001 Hollowpoint. All in all great bikes. 140mm of travel with a 140mm Pike up front. I also have owned two 7points and a 2001 V10. So really, the only bikes I have bought since about 2002 have been Ironhorse's with DW linkage, so this was a really big step for me.:think:

I decided to get a new bike bc my 7point was too burly and heavy to keep up with my friends on their Kona Coil Air's, Ventana El Ciclone's etc and my MK3 was too "xc" when it came to the small drops, jumps and steep rock rollers with abrupt transitions (OTB city!!). I'm keeping the 7pt bc it is newer and also a blast on some of the local DH trails where there is no shuttle option. But I have a feeling I'll be riding it less and less now. Special thanks to the guys at 5689 Bike Studio in south OC. http://www.5689bikestudio.com/ for some great service!!

Here is the rundown on the Spitty Specs:
-Medium black ano spitfire frame with a PUSH'd 2005 Fox RP23 (off the MK3)
-2008 Fox 36 VAN (coil)
-Saint front brake 203mm, XT rear 185mm (both with the "servo" levers)
-Raceface Deus cranks with a 36/22 Bash setup
-Sram x9 drivetrain
-WTB front hub with a skinny XC rim (soon to be swapped for a Flow)
-Hadley bolt-on rear hub with Mavic 819 UST rim
-WTB seat on a Sette seatpost (My legs are too long for the Banshee post that was included & saving funds for a Reverb eventually)
-EA50 70mm stem with 20degree rise and a 3/4in rise 680mm bar



Just getting on the bike my initial impressions were that the reach (ETT) is just about the same as my Large MK3 (which was a 23.5in) but the front wheel seemed to be a fair bit further in front of me, due to the slack HT. The bars were also a bit higher, but that could be due to the 3/4in spacer and 20 degree stem I was using. I may switch back to my old stem and bar just to compare (it was a 70mm 0degree with a 1/2in rise bar, no spacers) but again, probably only temporarily.

Yesterday was the first ride on this bad-boy and WOW, was I impressed. Unfortunately no pics bc I was having way too much fun to stop. Now, this may seem like it isn't impressive, but I would say that is climbs almost as well as my MK3 and descends almost as well as my 7point. When they say that the bike is long and low, they mean it.

The ride (as most do) started off with a climb... some steep sections, a few tight switchbacks etc. I was a bit worried that the more upright position would hamper me or that the front wheel would wander but that really wasn't an issue. I did have to be a little more concentrated on the steep tight switchbacks but I still made them all w/o dabbing. I was also a little worried that there would be some "bob" with the 22t granny but this really was not the case. At least not with the Pro-Pedal on, and I even had a light pro-pedal setup from Push since this was coming off a DW link bike. Didn't try it w/o the PP. All in all, the bike climbs great and unfortunately cannot be my excuse when my friends leave me behind. ;) Only my legs and lungs are holding me back. Oh, and my back (series of bulging disks over the past 2 years). The bike really scoots when you put down the power. Granted, the bushings have yet to really wear in so that is a little extra "propedal" so to speak. If things change later on I'll update this, but I doubt it will be noticeable.

Once at the top I put the seat back down and got ready to go (dang a reverb would have been awesome here). The first trail was newly built so it was pretty tight with some swoopy bermed turns and some tight switchbacks (some bermed, some not). The bike was VERY stable coming back down and ate up the swoopy turns. It was a little noticeably longer when it came to the switchback turns though, but I was right on the butt of my friend on his 7pt the whole way down.

We then climbed up a steep fireroad (the 3rd "B" for those of you who know Santiago Oaks) and again the bike felt great on the climb. I was afraid again that the front would pop-up a bit since this is a STEEP fireroad but it didn't even wander too much to my pleasant surprise.

Next up was the "main course"... a FAST all-out no brakes descent with some little booters and drops thrown in for fun. This was my first real "downhill" on the bike (not DH downhill) and I was hitting things faster/further/bigger on my first run than I would have ever hit them on my MK3. Almost as fast as on my 7point and it has 2in more travel in back, a coil shock and a Totem up front. From there the trail goes into a section of rocks where the spandex guys take it as a small series of S turns.... I straightline it though. It doesn't have big drops or anything but is is steep and rough this way. This section the bike WAS a little more bumpy than on my 7point, but I could take it almost as fast...and surely faster than on the MK3. Then there are a series of little table top jumps about 2-3ft high and 5-6ft long. The bike felt very stable on these and I was easily able to adjust the amount of air I was getting in order to not over-clear them. Again, almost no brakes here... just using the bike and my pre-loading to hit them perfectly. I wasn't "flicking" the bike on them, but the bike WAS very stable and confident in the air. I even threw in a little whip on one with ease (there was a mother and her daughter standing right next to them as they hiked up the trail so I had to show off a bit). Without a doubt, I was hitting things on the trial that I would usually only hit on the 7point and NOT on the MK3 and this was still my first ride on the bike. Best of them was a 2ft rock where if you hit it with speed has a nice fade-away landing about 8ft out, so you are actually landing about 5ft below the take-off onto a nice smooth transition. If you go slower it is more of a flat landing, so I launched it. WOW... this is my FIRST ride on the bike!!! No "lets take it easy" here!!


So am I happy with the bike? HECK YEAH!! :thumb::weee:
I'm SO glad I didn't go with that DW 5spot instead.

Oh, one last thing... since this bike has some unique geometry there have been a lot of people in a quandary over what size to get. Luckily I was able to test out HAB's spitty a month ago. He is only 1in taller than me and he rides a large (and is very happy with it). I have a Medium and am very happy with the Medium. I'm 5'11" he is about 6ft... the difference is that I have long legs and short torso (every car I get in I have to put the seat ALL the way back) he has shorter legs and longer torso... at least shorter than mine. As I said, I wasn't even able to use the Banshee post the bike came with bc I had to extend it at least 1.5 - 2in past the "min insertion" line. With the steep seat-tube the 23in ETT feels pretty much the same as my 23.5tt MKIII Standover is GREAT though.
 
Last edited:

ZoRo

Turbo Monkey
Sep 28, 2004
1,224
11
MTL
Great review. I would tend to think that a bike like that be better off, depending on the rider of course, with a 50mm no angle stem (Thomson 50mm comes to mind). I don't know if it would worsen the climbing abilities of the bike, but I'm sure it would be more nimble and flickable in the descents.
 

-BB-

I broke all the rules, but somehow still became mo
Sep 6, 2001
4,254
28
Livin it up in the O.C.
Great review. I would tend to think that a bike like that be better off, depending on the rider of course, with a 50mm no angle stem (Thomson 50mm comes to mind). I don't know if it would worsen the climbing abilities of the bike, but I'm sure it would be more nimble and flickable in the descents.
If the bike was only going down then I would agree 100% At least on the 50mm part. The 70mm helps when the trail goes back up though. In fact, I use a 70mm on my 7pt as well. As for the rise, this bike has a very short HT (4in I believe) to help keep a bit more weight up front and make it more in line with a trail bike than a DH bike. And to keep the front from popping up on steep climbs, so the rise on this bar puts you more upright and probably helps when going back down. It is still a fair bit lower than my 7pt which has a 0 degree.
 

dbozman

Monkey
May 11, 2008
118
0
Scottsdale, AZ
Nice review. I was pretty interested in this as a trail bike, but the bottom bracket height is just too low for rock-riding here in AZ. Nice-looking rig, though.
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,362
1,598
Warsaw :/
Nice review. I was pretty interested in this as a trail bike, but the bottom bracket height is just too low for rock-riding here in AZ. Nice-looking rig, though.
1) It has adjustable geo
2) Uphill too low? Because I've done the mega trail (very very rocky) on a 13.7'' 200mm bike. It should be 10times easier on a spitty.
 

qikss

Chimp
Apr 15, 2010
14
0
laguna
Nice review. Ive been eying spittys for a while now...just cant decide on size. Im 5'8.5", short legs and arms with long torso. Im thinking a medium with a short stem might work for me.

BB-Can we meet up so i can check out your bike sometime?
 
Last edited:

-BB-

I broke all the rules, but somehow still became mo
Sep 6, 2001
4,254
28
Livin it up in the O.C.
Nice review. Ive been eying spittys for a while now...just cant decide on size. Im 5'8.5", short legs and arms with long torso. Im thinking a medium with a short stem might work for me.

BB-Can we meet up so i can check out your bike sometime?
Not a problem... HAB did the same for me and it kept me from making a BIG mistake and getting a Lg instead of a Med.

What are you on now?
 
Last edited:

-BB-

I broke all the rules, but somehow still became mo
Sep 6, 2001
4,254
28
Livin it up in the O.C.
Nice review. I was pretty interested in this as a trail bike, but the bottom bracket height is just too low for rock-riding here in AZ. Nice-looking rig, though.
Haha... I may actually bring it with me to South Mtn in a few weeks. Was out there back on March 4th and rode Desert Classic on my MK3. I would ride the spitty there again in a second.
 

-BB-

I broke all the rules, but somehow still became mo
Sep 6, 2001
4,254
28
Livin it up in the O.C.
NorBar and Gkiss... you two related or something. At first I was thinking you were only one user/poster bc all I saw was cookie monster as an avatar. Never mind they were different CM pics.
 

qikss

Chimp
Apr 15, 2010
14
0
laguna
No ha...banshee owners have a soft spot for cookies I guess...

I dont have a trail bike now...i pedal my legend around when im looking for pain. When do you plan on riding the oaks again?
 

dbozman

Monkey
May 11, 2008
118
0
Scottsdale, AZ
Haha... I may actually bring it with me to South Mtn in a few weeks. Was out there back on March 4th and rode Desert Classic on my MK3. I would ride the spitty there again in a second.
Nice. I would typically be riding National as I try to stay away from DC (too crowded, no tech). Also some of the more tech stuff at Phoenix Mountain Preserve.

Until recently, my trail bike had been an El Guapo and the 13.7-ish BB height was just too low for my tastes and the trails I typically run.

Neither here nor there, though, it's a kick-arse rig if the geo works for you. All I can say is if the BB where about 14 and everything else were the same, Banshee would be getting some of my hard-earned cash.
 

HAB

Chelsea from Seattle
Apr 28, 2007
11,580
2,006
Seattle
Nice. I would typically be riding National as I try to stay away from DC (too crowded, no tech). Also some of the more tech stuff at Phoenix Mountain Preserve.

Until recently, my trail bike had been an El Guapo and the 13.7-ish BB height was just too low for my tastes and the trails I typically run.

Neither here nor there, though, it's a kick-arse rig if the geo works for you. All I can say is if the BB where about 14 and everything else were the same, Banshee would be getting some of my hard-earned cash.
Then why not a Rune? Angleset it if you want it slacker.
 

HAB

Chelsea from Seattle
Apr 28, 2007
11,580
2,006
Seattle
Or use a higher fork/headset.
I'd advise against that. I had a 170mm Lyric on mine with a flush headset briefly and it felt pretty unbalanced and off. With the fork dropped to 160 it's loads better.
 

DH Dad

Monkey
Jun 12, 2002
436
30
MA
Nice review. Ive been eying spittys for a while now...just cant decide on size. Im 5'8.5", short legs and arms with long torso. Im thinking a medium with a short stem might work for me.

BB-Can we meet up so i can check out your bike sometime?
I'm 5'8" (maybe a half inch shorter now since I ruptured my L5/S1 lumbar disc last summer) with short legs/arms and a longer torso. I ride a medium Spitfire with a 70mm stem. Reach is very good for longer rides and climbing but I agree it may be a little more fun with a 50mm stem which I may try this year. The BB is low but I've only ridden it in the slack setting so far, may try the other setting soon which steepens up the HA and raises the BB. This bike was a very big change for me as I was riding a Banshee Rampant prior to this which was very quick and flickable, the change in WB was huge for me and I still haven't adjusted on pedal kicks yet. I ditched the Rampant since with the ruptured disc I need a Front Derailleur so I can spin a little more often now instead of hammering, have a 26-36-bash front setup with an old XTR 12-32 8 spd rear. This build is lighter than the Rampant was, about 28.8 lbs on my Park bike scale. Looking to swap the flat Aircorps pedals for clipless this year so I can spin more. Here's a pic of the ride.

 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,362
1,598
Warsaw :/
I'd advise against that. I had a 170mm Lyric on mine with a flush headset briefly and it felt pretty unbalanced and off. With the fork dropped to 160 it's loads better.
I wonder whether it was the fork travel or bar height. In both cases you can still go around those (160mm manitou fork if the travel was a problem or lower bars/stem if it was the bar height). Though Rune + offset headset sounds nice too.
 

Pip3r

Turbo Monkey
Nov 20, 2001
1,112
0
Foxboro MA


I've been rocking this one for almost a year now. I was coming off a Medium MK3 (which was too small for me for trail riding) and my Spitfire is a Large.

It's a pretty sweet bike. I refer to it as a 'trouble maker' when you can open the throttle up, because the geometry of this thing allows you to ride it almost like a downhill bike - untill you go hammering into rough stuff and get smacked with the reality you only have 5" of travel. Still though, I didn't build up a DH bike last year and literally was able to keep up with my buddies on days of lift serviced DH riding for %85 of the riding.

Mine built up quite light and is really flickable. I did a lot of jump trail riding on this thing at Highland. Because its long its not so poppy, but because its light its super fun to whip/scrub.

I've ridden mine quite a bit in both geometry settings, primarily in the steeper one for daily trail riding. I do find the suspension is more supple in the low/slack setting. One of my biggest gripes with the bike is the bushing linkage which so far has been very sticky on mine - I need to pull the whole rear end off and properly lube + torque everything and re-evaluate it.

The one other issue I have with it is that I wish the chainstay was a little shorter, it would make the bike a bit more fun on the trail and less planted. Related to that, I also have had a hard time getting the front wheel comfortably weighted in corners, which may be a bi-product of the longish chainstays. In fairness though, this is not as much of an issue in the 'slack' setting.

Overall it has been a pretty great ride - very inspiring geometry wise.
 

-BB-

I broke all the rules, but somehow still became mo
Sep 6, 2001
4,254
28
Livin it up in the O.C.


The one other issue I have with it is that I wish the chainstay was a little shorter, it would make the bike a bit more fun on the trail and less planted. Related to that, I also have had a hard time getting the front wheel comfortably weighted in corners, which may be a bi-product of the longish chainstays. In fairness though, this is not as much of an issue in the 'slack' setting.

Overall it has been a pretty great ride - very inspiring geometry wise.
At first I was with you on this point (Chainstays) but I think that if they were shorter the front end would pop-up on steep climbs more.
 

jutny

Monkey
Jan 15, 2009
306
0
Montclair, NJ
everything for mine is ordered. first parts showed up at work today, many of my selections are backordered at the moment so it'll be the end of the month easy before I see all of it.

Also, just shattered my 2nd metacarpal on my right hand on Sunday, so I won't be riding it any time too soon either.
 

aenema

almost 100% positive
Sep 5, 2008
306
111
I also wish the chainstays were a bit shorter to make the bike more playful. I think that the low bb height and slack head angle will still make the bike plenty stable at speeds and I think as long as the seat angle is still fairly steep the wandering front end won't be too much of an issue. Sub 17 inches would be sweet for me but I also don't live/ride in muddy conditions and don't need the clearance clarence.
 

HAB

Chelsea from Seattle
Apr 28, 2007
11,580
2,006
Seattle
I wonder whether it was the fork travel or bar height. In both cases you can still go around those (160mm manitou fork if the travel was a problem or lower bars/stem if it was the bar height). Though Rune + offset headset sounds nice too.
Bar height didn't change. I've got 10mm of spacers under the stem with the fork at 160, ditched them when I had it at 170.