Quantcast

Maverick has shut down

daisycutter

Turbo Monkey
Apr 8, 2006
1,660
129
New York City
I had not heard about them in a while. Nice designs, but Paul turner left them they seemed to flounder


GOLDEN, CO (BRAIN) Jan. 19, 5:30 pm MT — The mountain bike cult brand Maverick has shut down as of Jan. 1, and the brand's future is uncertain.

Former Maverick technical support manager Ethan Franklin announced on MTBR.com that operations ended at the first of the year. Franklin plans to open a small parts and repair business to service Maverick owners.

RockShox co-founder Paul Turner, a co-founder of Maverick, has reclaimed the brand and intellectual property, according to Franklin.

"What he will do with it remains up in the air; some rumors have floated around but none for me to add to," Franklin said. "I don't think the technology will disappear, it's too good and other manufactures are looking for ways to beat their competition."

Turner told BRAIN in an email that he's talking to "different folks who are interested in doing something with the brand and some other options. Hopefully it won't die."

Turner founded Maverick with Frank Vogel in 1999. In 2008 Mike Swafford and Chris Russum, formerly longtime employees at Wheat Ridge Cyclery, bought the company and moved it from Boulder to Golden. Turner received royalties on sales of Maverick bikes.

While the brand was ahead of its time when founded, the company apparently lacked the resources to keep it up to date and develop new designs, including 29ers.

Maverick shared space with Spot Brand bikes in Golden but there was no ownership relationship between the two brands
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,080
5,998
borcester rhymes
Maverick had some cool designs but it always bugged me that they used so many proprietary components. I understand "think different" but I could never bring myself to buy one because as soon as turner left, things went nowhere. I hope he breathes some life into Maverick, as the ML8 is a really cool bike, but you can't compete if you don't try. Maybe the duc36 killed them.
 

Gex

Turbo Monkey
Oct 29, 2004
1,112
0
Seattle
Never really cared for Maverick. They had that terrible fork on the Trek 69er and their frames were meh at best. Saw a bunch down in Moab when I was there a couple years ago and every once in awhile one would roll into the shop, still nothing special.
 

eaterofdog

ass grabber
Sep 8, 2006
8,330
1,571
Central Florida
They should have gotten the word out by buying a background ad on RM with the bike flipped on one side so it has left hand drive and reversed text.
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,080
5,998
borcester rhymes
I liked the attitude they brought with them. All of their bikes had different names on the headtube badge. Kind of a neat way of doing things vs. a serial number. They were more of a crunchy "vibe" MTB company vs. the "kit" and "colourway" attitude of most people nowadays.
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,080
5,998
borcester rhymes
i have no idea what any of that means.
they cared about things and stuff, man. Not shredding mad gnar with flat billed caps, bro.

in other words, Turner was an old school mountain biker, and a lot of companies now a days are squeezing out dollars wherever possible. That just seems like the way it is to me.
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
85,990
24,539
media blackout
they cared about things and stuff, man. Not shredding mad gnar with flat billed caps, bro.

in other words, Turner was an old school mountain biker, and a lot of companies now a days are squeezing out dollars wherever possible. That just seems like the way it is to me.
based on what i've heard about the bikes, i wouldn't include "making a bike that doesn't ride like ass" on the list of things they cared about
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
I am fairly familiar with Maverick, having sold them.

I thought it was a proprietary design but not a huge leap from regular forks and suspension frames.

Mostly, the owners seemed awfully proud of themselves, which made me dubious.
 

jdcamb

Tool Time!
Feb 17, 2002
19,839
8,441
Nowhere Man!
I am fairly familiar with Maverick, having sold them.

I thought it was a proprietary design but not a huge leap from regular forks and suspension frames.

Mostly, the owners seemed awfully proud of themselves, which made me dubious.
They did ride nice. I enjoyed the time I spent on one. I beat the piss out of a Demo at Pedros. Rode it down Jiminy Peak a number of times that weekend.
 

daisycutter

Turbo Monkey
Apr 8, 2006
1,660
129
New York City
BACKGROUND
Maverick was born of a simple idea – to make a better bike. We didn’t start with a business plan or a marketing scheme, just the pure and straightforward desire to design and build the kind of bike we’d like to ride in the hills above Boulder.

“I wanted one. Paul wanted one. It was really that simple,” remembers co-founder, Frank Vogel. “We just made the bike because it’s what we wanted.”

And so back in 1999 Maverick began in Paul Turner’s garage. The story is often told: In the late 80’s Paul took his expertise and skills as a Honda motocross mechanic and revolutionized the world of cycling by inventing RockShox. Tired of the corporate culture he moved on and by ’99 began drafting and designing a suspension bike. Turner and Vogel got together not to build a business, but to build their dream mountain bike.

Vogel, a skilled and experienced machinist and prototype builder, helped Turner design and develop a unique rear suspension, and after countless iterations, they had a bike to field test. Paul and Frank started to ride what they called the ML 5, and others took notice. Rumors of the bike circulated and friends wanted to ride it…then have one. A few more redesigns and they arrived at the bike we know as the ML7. By 2000 they’d built two dozen for buddies and colleagues. The design focused on elegant, efficient manipulation of the rear wheel path, what they called MonoLink suspension. The ML7 relied on the industry’s first integrated rear shock—the shock was built into the bike, not just bolted on. The MonoLink suspension offers unmatched lateral stiffness, and allows the front and rear wheels to travel in virtually the same path when active. This is now known as Parallel Path Technology.

Turner and Vogel had set out to build two bikes. Then word got out and a business was born. Though the bike wasn’t for everybody, free thinkers embraced the ingenious simplicity and logical innovation. The ML7 tossed out conformity and invented its own class of mountain bike – one bike that is freeride-ready, cross-country efficient, and chargeable on the downhills.

As the business evolved, a small cadre of like-minded designers, engineers, and builders came together. We embraced what worked, and pioneered our own technology when needed. This approach lead us to the sub-four-pound six-inch-travel fork (DUC 32), a design that today still sets the standard for what front suspension can do.

The inner motivation is to build what works the best. The idea may not be geared towards the masses and not everyone agrees with our ideas. In fact, many don’t “get” our bikes. Our company is built around those who do and for those willing look at mountain bikes with a fresh perspective. But for the passionate we’ve stayed the course – building the bikes, forks, and components we (and you!) want to ride and it’s helped us build a loyal posse. Over the years we’ve realized that as unconventional as we are, so are the folks riding our bikes. Thanks for being part of the ride and allowing us to turn our ideas into reality.
 

Jeremy R

<b>x</b>
Nov 15, 2001
9,698
1,053
behind you with a snap pop
You ever hear of some really old person dying from your hometown, and then you are all surprised because you thought that person had died a long time ago?

I am having that same feeling right now.
Mildred = Maverick
 

woodsguy

gets infinity MPG
Mar 18, 2007
1,083
1
Sutton, MA
I demoed one a couple years ago. Can't remember the model but it was the trail bike. It decended much better than the steep HA would suggest but it still climbed well. Overall it felt a bit weird but I'm sure that would go away with more time in the saddle. But it wasn't my favorite that I tried that day. The major drawback was the price. That same year I was in Georgia and a shop had them to rent. They wanted $80/day for a 2 year old model. I got a brand new Trek EX8 for $30 at another shop instead.