Quantcast

Boobies...

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
Soooo..... Planned Parenthood *shouldn't* use the half-million in donations to replace the funds lost due to SGK's decision, and instead should turn down that money and direct money from one desperately needed service to another? If donors are willing to stand up and (quickly) replace the money, why would PP arbitrarily cut funding for access to one area just to appease the wing-nuts who wanted that result in the first place? I'm so confused.
Well if there's one thing I've learned from glen beck and ron paul, it's that government assistence should be cut because private non-profits and churches will fill the void. Always. With everything.
 

dante

Unabomber
Feb 13, 2004
8,807
9
looking for classic NE singletrack
Ok, what I want to know is, how fvcking DUMB is SGK right now?

This is an unmitigated public relations disaster for them. People are quitting their organization (or this one), their FB page is filled with thousands of irate former supporters (or just irate posters), groups are disassociating with them, and politicians are publicly backing away from supporting them. I can't *fathom* how this is going to end well for them, or that the anti-abortion supporters are going to be able to make up amounts lost by the pro-choice people who are leaving SGK and their activities in droves. It reminds me of the GM "cyclist" ad that caught fire, spread throughout the internet and led to GM issuing an apology and pulling any further advertising.

Now there's this, apparently SGK isn't even following it's own policies when it's pulling funds for organizations that are under federal or local investigation....

Susan G. Komen for the Cure, which recently announced that it is ending grants to Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening because of a controversial investigation launched by an anti-abortion Republican congressman, currently funds cancer research at the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center to the tune of $7.5 million. Like Planned Parenthood, Penn State is currently the subject of a federal government investigation, and like the Planned Parenthood grant, the Penn State grant appears to violate a new internal rule at Komen that bans grants to organizations that are under investigation by federal, state, or local governments. But so far, only the Planned Parenthood grants appear to have been cancelled.

The Department of Education announced that it was investigating Penn State over possible Clery Act violations last November, and a Penn State spokesperson told Mother Jones that the investigation is ongoing. The Komen foundation has not yet responded to a request for comment.
This has spiraled out of control so fast that there's NO way SGK comes out of this with any dignity left.
 

dante

Unabomber
Feb 13, 2004
8,807
9
looking for classic NE singletrack
More internet lulz... Don't people know that anything out on the internet is there forever, even if you delete it from your website and FB pages?

On Dec. 2, 2011, Doug Scott, president of Life Decisions International, announced on its Facebook page that Komen was off its boycott list because it no longer was funding Planned Parenthood.

"Please keep in mind that if the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation deserved to be included in The Boycott List, it would still be there," he wrote. "There is reason to celebrate. Just do not do it too loudly."

That post has since evaporated.

Poof! Gone.

........

Curiously, only months earlier, in June 2011, Komen posted on its website a statement in support of Planned Parenthood: "During the past five years, Komen Affiliate grants to Planned Parenthood have funded 139,000 clinical breast exams and nearly 5,000 mammograms, enabling the detection of 177 breast cancers. ... As long as there is a need for health care for vulnerable populations, Komen will fund the facilities that can best meet those needs."

That statement recently evaporated from Komen's website.

Poof! Gone.
 

stevew

resident influencer
Sep 21, 2001
40,494
9,524
what's shocking...the foundation was started by a republican..

mind blown.
 

X3pilot

Texans fan - LOL
Aug 13, 2007
5,860
1
SoMD
Stinkle, while I respect your right to poke and be the thorn, have you experienced breast cancer in your life in any way? If you have, please tell me you talked to the doctors and other professionals who will tell you that SGK, Avon, and basically any pink ribbon organization can't do squat about curing cancer. Many besides me feel that big pharma does not want a cure, so professionals will tell you that screenings are the best hope for a "cure". Want to help with the SGK Race for the Cure? Even to volunteer as a cancer survivor and family member (family members are considered survivors too) it cost you $90. To volunteer! SO if that money can make sure someone who can't afford insurance or to pay for a screening, great. To pay the salary of a Republican governor candidate endorsed by Sarah Palin...not so much. Forget the politics, focus on helping fight the disease.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
Ok, what I want to know is, how fvcking DUMB is SGK right now?
not as dumb as PP, who has overplayed their hand, i believe
they've put everyone else on notice they will quickly lash out & use thuggish tactics as a first line of defense

can you imagine? you're a fat cat wanting to be philanthropic -- perhaps influenced by a personal tragedy like komen -- and now you're having second thoughts.

nothing like wimmin scorned, eh?
This has spiraled out of control so fast that there's NO way SGK comes out of this with any dignity left.
why do you think your opinion equals prevailing wisdom? am i the only conservative voice you bother to annoy yourself with?
Stinkle, while I respect your right to poke and be the thorn, have you experienced breast cancer in your life in any way?
not beyond relatives & lifelong friends, no
Want to help with the SGK Race for the Cure? Even to volunteer as a cancer survivor and family member (family members are considered survivors too) it cost you $90. To volunteer!
i've neither sought to volunteer, mostly b/c i don't see the value in it
now i see even less
 

Beef Supreme

Turbo Monkey
Oct 29, 2010
1,434
73
Hiding from the stupid
what's shocking...the foundation was started by a republican..

mind blown.
Founded by a Republican but supported by liberals. You would think they would know that.

Forget the politics, focus on helping fight the disease.
Agreed. Sadly, I must spread rep.

not as dumb as PP, who has overplayed their hand, i believe
they've put everyone else on notice they will quickly lash out & use thuggish tactics as a first line of defense
I haven't called you a dumba$$ in a really long time. This seems like the perfect opportunity.
 

dante

Unabomber
Feb 13, 2004
8,807
9
looking for classic NE singletrack
not as dumb as PP, who has overplayed their hand, i believe
they've put everyone else on notice they will quickly lash out & use thuggish tactics as a first line of defense

can you imagine? you're a fat cat wanting to be philanthropic -- perhaps influenced by a personal tragedy like komen -- and now you're having second thoughts.

nothing like wimmin scorned, eh?
why do you think your opinion equals prevailing wisdom? am i the only conservative voice you bother to annoy yourself with?
Lol, I guess we'll see what happens and which organization folds first. My guess is there's lasting damage to the SGK brand, but that's only a prediction... Although I personally like the first few lines of the Politico story:

If this was supposed to be damage control, Susan G. Komen for the Cure proved Thursday that it has a lot to learn. On a day when the breast cancer charity’s top official made the rounds with the national media, insisting the organization’s decision to stop giving grants to Planned Parenthood wasn’t political, the firestorm only got worse. Top Democrats piled on; the head of the Komen chapter in Los Angeles quit; and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is giving a $250,000 matching gift to Planned Parenthood.

If anything, Susan G. Komen seems to be in deeper trouble than when it started defending itself.
Oh, and the 7 Cali chapters just stated that they won't abide by the national decision and will continue funding Planned Parenthood. But hey, I'm sure Redstate.com is probably totally defending Komen, so there's two sides to every store... I guess.

X3Pilot - Sorry to hear about what you've been through, and hopefully it was caught in time and there won't be further complications. Thank you for the reminder that it's not just political banter but also about lives and monetary research towards a cure hangs in the balance. I don't agree with Komen's financials and the (little) amount of money that goes specifically towards cancer research, but the fact that they *were* donating money and working towards a cure should not be forgotten. (And tried to +rep, but must spread some around first)
 

JohnE

filthy rascist
May 13, 2005
13,430
1,949
Front Range, dude...
Forget the politics, focus on helping fight the disease.
Quoted for awesome-osity. My Mum died from breast, lung and brain cancer. I have tried to support Komen as I can, beleiving in them and trusting in their intent. I am saddened and disheartened by the mixing of politics and charity towards a cause that effects all economic strata. Piss on politics...

And Stinkle is, was and will always be an a$$hole. Am I the only one who wonders why he is still here?
 

X3pilot

Texans fan - LOL
Aug 13, 2007
5,860
1
SoMD
Thanks for the nice comments. My wife was screened every year mainly because I'm fortunate to have good insurance. Hers was caught in time and as of now, she is cancer free. However, it was a radical decision to undergo a double mastectomy, mainly because of hospitals want to do seperate procedures so they can charge twice for surgical suite, xrays, nurses, etc. (Not kidding, was told this by the John Hopkins surgeon). Screenings are the only way to fight the disease right now. Early detection saves lives. If the money comes from a church, a biker gang or a pink ribbon cause, I don't care.

Stink..since your smart a$$ remark of "other than family and close friends" means this disease has indeed affected yours and others lives close to you, I hope you used your real person personality and not your PAWN persona in showing some compassion and understanding for them. (Disclaimer: I do not know Stinkle personally)
 

Pesqueeb

bicycle in airplane hangar
Feb 2, 2007
40,145
16,539
Riding the baggage carousel.
...somehow I doubt that he has a seperate persona apart from his PAWN persona.
Here in the Springs he's referred to as a "moderate". :twitch: As distasteful as I find it to defend $tinkle, lets face it, he's the only one keeping this place from becoming a full fledged liberal circle jerk. Plus I find him way more endearing than N8 or Hello Kitty. (disclaimer, we have never actually met)
 

dante

Unabomber
Feb 13, 2004
8,807
9
looking for classic NE singletrack
I'm pretty sure that the only reason so many of us are "liberals" is that the right-wingers have lurched so far to the right that moderates and ex-Republicans are suddenly rebranded as die-hard socialists...

And I have to say, the more I learn about SGK the less I like them, from pulling all ($12m/year) funding related to embryonic stem cells to playing down environmental risks that might upset their corporate sponsors (BPA most recently) they just seem like they're far more interested in raising money than actually finding a cure... They remind me of the AIDS Ride group that came under fire for the low amount of money that *actually* went to AIDS research as opposed to organizational costs.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
i'll have you know, i'm actually quite pleasant

all animals love me, and i'm adored by both my peers & nearly all kids. if i'm ever late or absent from work, i get texts/calls/visits wondering "if there's anything i can do to ease your burden...", which obviously is following my example. i greet everyone on the trails, and dismount my bike for equine. i have numerous accolades & awards purely based upon recognition of my demeanor, the display of which would be counter to my boundless humility. at my request, they are delivered unceremoniously in discrete wrapping to an anonymous PO box. my canadian counterparts have taken note, and as a result of my influence are re-writing their employee "code of conduct" handbook section. i'm the separated-at-birth peche triplet. have a dying houseplant? i'll gargle regular tap water & spit it into the pot. just wait 4 hrs to begin to see results. i don't work across the street from focus on the family. focus on the family works across the street from me.

but make no mistake: i drive like a meth-addled priest, especially this morning
 

Pesqueeb

bicycle in airplane hangar
Feb 2, 2007
40,145
16,539
Riding the baggage carousel.
Dante is psychic. :panic: :tinfoil:

Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation. We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. That is what is right and fair.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/03/susan-g-komen-planned-parenthood_n_1252651.html
So, Komen is going to revoke its grants to Penn State still right?
 
Last edited:

dante

Unabomber
Feb 13, 2004
8,807
9
looking for classic NE singletrack
So..... *was* this all about the "under investigation" after all? I thought that it was about "passthrough grants"? That was their story yesterday, and they didn't mention the investigation aspect at all.

While the immediate apology and reversal was probably the best way to try to contain the controversy, they've done some long-lasting damage to the brand with this, *and* they've pissed off the right-wing anti-abortion groups that were trying to be supportive over the last 48h. So massive loss of donors/volunteers from the people who are so turned off by their recent actions, and they won't even have the backstop of increased donors from the wingnuts. Best case scenario is they lie low for awhile and hope it all blows over, but it's going to be a rough couple years.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
23
SF, CA
so it's evil to be perceived as trolling (i'm not), but willfully choosing not to immediately take action to backfill the gap for life saving cancer screening is what? inconvenient, or just bureaucratic?
Planned Parenthood immediately instituted measures to ensure that there would be no interruption of cancer screening to low income women. Because they actually care about women's health.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
23
SF, CA
they just seem like they're far more interested in raising money than actually finding a cure...
They are. It's a rich women's social club that allows large corporate sponsors to pretend they care about women in a way that keeps them nicely separated from inconvenient issues of abortion or sexual promiscuity which are, of course, central to women's health for anyone pre-menopause. Sh!t, even other post-menopause illnesses don't get the same attention because everyone knows pussies are gross - I don't see no brightly colored NFL helmet straps for cervical cancer, do you? But everyone loves titties, so it's a convenient way to raise money for whogivesafvckwegavemoneysowecanfeelgood.

There has been little to no progress towards improved cancer screening or treatment, let alone cure, despite billions of dollars in charity and billions more in pink merchandise. We do a sh!tload more screenings and a sh!tload more biopsies and a sh!tload more chemo sessions, but apparently more women are dying of breast cancer than ever. Probably a good time to examine our research strategies and perhaps fund more innovative and efficient charities?

edit: to be clear. horrible disease and we should keep funding the fight, keep funding screenings, but maybe re-examine whether behemoths like Komen that have evolved so far from their cause and into a big merchandising social club are the right avenue to detection, treatment and cure.
 
Last edited:

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
Because they actually care to cover up cases of statutory rape.
i have more, just in case you care to put them on some sort of pedestal

they are an evil organization founded upon hatred for 'impure' genetics. apart from marketing, not much in their fundamental world view has changed since.

while i support termination for danger to a woman's life, abortion-on-demand is no different than capricious extermination, b/c that's the precise definition. how actually caring is it that when pre-natal testing suggests a special needs child (*very* broadly defined, btw), termination is the suggested course of action? if that isn't cleansing the gene pool, then that phrase has no useful meaning.

if they truly care for women's health, why do they resist measures to provide an informed decision as to how best proceed (for the pregnant woman, not PP or its proxies)? why have the last few years been fraught w/ legislative & judicial actions used to "coerce" PP into providing more access to scientific breakthroughs, that can only be beneficial to women? you know, that silly thing categorically eschewed by fundies?

i'm not one of those a-holes who protest, scream at women who go into clinics, or endorse violent action or unlawful intimidation in any form, but i am rather confused as to how one can claim to be a champion of women's health while remaining willfully ignorant as to the worst practices of PP

oh, and more relevant to this thread: do you know how many cancer screenings PP perform? i found this rather saddening:

 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
Well what do you expect to actually understand when your opinions on PP are based on the 60s?

apart from marketing, not much in their fundamental world view has changed since.

That would be funny if it didn't point out how little you actually understand about what PP does these days.

Lay off the nutjob newletters for a few months.
 

dante

Unabomber
Feb 13, 2004
8,807
9
looking for classic NE singletrack
i have more, just in case you care to put them on some sort of pedestal

they are an evil organization founded upon hatred for 'impure' genetics. apart from marketing, not much in their fundamental world view has changed since.

while i support termination for danger to a woman's life, abortion-on-demand is no different than capricious extermination, b/c that's the precise definition. how actually caring is it that when pre-natal testing suggests a special needs child (*very* broadly defined, btw), termination is the suggested course of action? if that isn't cleansing the gene pool, then that phrase has no useful meaning.

if they truly care for women's health, why do they resist measures to provide an informed decision as to how best proceed (for the pregnant woman, not PP or its proxies)? why have the last few years been fraught w/ legislative & judicial actions used to "coerce" PP into providing more access to scientific breakthroughs, that can only be beneficial to women? you know, that silly thing categorically eschewed by fundies?

i'm not one of those a-holes who protest, scream at women who go into clinics, or endorse violent action or unlawful intimidation in any form, but i am rather confused as to how one can claim to be a champion of women's health while remaining willfully ignorant as to the worst practices of PP

oh, and more relevant to this thread: do you know how many cancer screenings PP perform? i found this rather saddening:
Uh, you do know that "cancer screenings" are part of a woman's annual "girlie checkup" where they do tests for STDs (including HPV which causes cervical cancer) as well as a visual inspection of the cervix for any type of malignant growth, right? "Cancer screening" is a function that PP performs every single day of the year.

As far as your little propaganda video, do you know the difference between a breast exam and a mammogram? The first is a non-mechanical inspection of the breast for abnormal (possibly pre-cancerous) lumps, and is done 170,000x per year by Planned Parenthood. This is usually done to women in their 20s and 30s, *before* their annual mammograms that start up between the ages of 40-45. When a suspicious lump is found, the patient is given a mammogram to determine whether the lump is cancerous or not. While some Planned Parenthood's *do* do mammograms, quite often PP will write the referral to an outside health agency to do it. To claim that PP doesn't do any "cancer screenings" is not only incorrect but laughably so.

Some light reading for you.

And by the way, your hatred of PP and your right-wing views on abortion explain quite a few of your posts in this thread, and probably explain the "circles" you were referring to when claiming that not everyone was against the SGK decision.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
doubling down are you?

Well what do you expect to actually understand when your opinions on PP are based on the 60s?
so what fundamental changes to their world view have happened in the past 1/2 century? has there been a significantly updated charter?

Basically, the Komen money is used twice, to provide vouchers for preventative care and to prop up the BCCS program. The Komen money essentially allows Planned Parenthood to work as a funding and referral service for women
so it seems PP provides mammography at least as thoroughly as does Siri. in this respect, they are both pass-throughs. shall we now publicly fund apple?

further reading of the BCCS program does leave room to infer a qualified woman could receive mammography through PP, which is a very good thing. i hope they decide to offer this service at least as widely as abortion-on-demand.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
so what fundamental changes to their world view have happened in the past 1/2 century? has there been a significantly updated charter?
Namely providing MULTIPLE services based soley on keeping people alive, regardless of what your chain emails tell you. I mean real, living people with families, friends, careers..........

Now I know that doesn't sound as exciting as your regurgitated BS that PP is some modern day eugenics program but it's already pretty apparent you don't know anyone who's actually ever been there and get your 'info' from the academic equivalent of ted haggard's (well worn) anus.
 
Last edited: