Quantcast

Mini-DH fork - Pike vs. XFusion Sweep

ZHendo

Turbo Monkey
Oct 29, 2006
1,661
147
PNW
Hey gents,

Both the Pike and the new XFusion offerings have been getting rave reviews, and given my experience with the XFusion Slant, I agree that they are making outstanding products.

I am building a Banshee Spitfire v2 and have a CCDB Air mounted up. I'm trying to make this build something that will keep me happy for the next few years, and while I have all of the other parts picked out, the fork is still a troubling part that I can't seem to nail down.

As my review buried somewhere in the boards states, I'm very happy with my XFusion Slant on my Chromag Samurai. It's a great fork, albeit a bit tall, and it seems to handle everything extremely well. That being said, we all know how much everyone seems to be loving the Pike. I haven't had more than an hour or so on the Pike and so it's very hard to tell whether the performance is truly superior, but I need to make a call here in the next 2 weeks and decide which fork I want. BikeMagic did a shootout-type review, but they didn't make very concrete points and all in all it was a pretty poorly executed test IMO. Anyone have any experience that might help me decide on one or the other?

Cheers.
 

supercow

Monkey
Feb 18, 2009
969
128
Not that its one of thw options, but the Bos Deville + ccdba on the Spitty makes it an incredible bike.
No 140mm travel frame has the right to be that fast on descents.
 

Foxbat

Chimp
Aug 14, 2008
71
0
Portland OR
It seems that every mtb website and publication is very averse to making any concrete judgments on a fork shootout. I'm guessing their worried about being blacklisted by manufacturers.

I'm in the same boat as I look for a replacement for my Fox Float 34. A fork with real low/high speed compression and rebound damping adjustments for 650B is nonexistent in a market of dumbed down forks. Right now I think the closest things are the Pike and possibly the Manitou Mattoc since there is Fox hasn't released a 650B 36. I'm curious to hear others opinions.
 

Foxbat

Chimp
Aug 14, 2008
71
0
Portland OR
I totally forgot about BOS since their availability in the US has been challenging. What is the price for a Deville now that there is a US distributor?
 

SuboptimusPrime

Turbo Monkey
Aug 18, 2005
1,659
1,636
NorCack
I've got a pike on the front of my spitfire with CCDBA and I'll just say that my pike is noticeably better than the 36 Van RC2 it replaced. Same stiffness, a ****load lighter and it finally does what I have long wanted my fork to do; absorb trail chatter nicely yet stay up in its travel.

I cannot compare to the Bos or the XFusion never having ridden either, but I can say that the Pike and CCDBA seem to match up very nicely on my spitfire as they both have a similar plush yet controlled feel.
 

Dogboy

Turbo Monkey
Apr 12, 2004
3,209
584
Durham, NC
I cannot compare to the Bos or the XFusion never having ridden either, but I can say that the Pike and CCDBA seem to match up very nicely on my spitfire as they both have a similar plush yet controlled feel.
I have the same combo on a SB66 and agree that they are very well matched. A really solid improvement over the 34 Float/Float that they replaced.
 

gemini2k

Turbo Monkey
Jul 31, 2005
3,526
117
San Francisco
How do you like you ccdbair? I've got one on my rune, and I'm horribly dissapointed with it, on all levels. I've tried a huge range of settings too. I'm swapping it out to drive that manitou swinger air, if I don't like that, then onto the Xfusion air shock. I'm pretty stoked on the vengance fork though. It'll be interesting to see how it feels after a rebuild.
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,368
1,606
Warsaw :/
How do you like you ccdbair? I've got one on my rune, and I'm horribly dissapointed with it, on all levels. I've tried a huge range of settings too. I'm swapping it out to drive that manitou swinger air, if I don't like that, then onto the Xfusion air shock. I'm pretty stoked on the vengance fork though. It'll be interesting to see how it feels after a rebuild.

Talked to Keith at banshee and the CC guys? You have the correct can size? I didn't try it on a rune but it's way better than any air shock I have tried.
 

supercow

Monkey
Feb 18, 2009
969
128
Indeed, sounds like something's not all there.
Takes a little while to bed in, but the shock is fantastic.
 

SuboptimusPrime

Turbo Monkey
Aug 18, 2005
1,659
1,636
NorCack
How do you like you ccdbair? I've got one on my rune, and I'm horribly dissapointed with it, on all levels. I've tried a huge range of settings too. I'm swapping it out to drive that manitou swinger air, if I don't like that, then onto the Xfusion air shock. I'm pretty stoked on the vengance fork though. It'll be interesting to see how it feels after a rebuild.
What specific problems have you had? Agree that a call to the folks at CC is in order, maybe send it in for them to check over.
 

FlipSide

Turbo Monkey
Sep 24, 2001
1,385
818
It seems that every mtb website and publication is very averse to making any concrete judgments on a fork shootout. I'm guessing their worried about being blacklisted by manufacturers.

I'm in the same boat as I look for a replacement for my Fox Float 34. A fork with real low/high speed compression and rebound damping adjustments for 650B is nonexistent in a market of dumbed down forks. Right now I think the closest things are the Pike and possibly the Manitou Mattoc since there is Fox hasn't released a 650B 36. I'm curious to hear others opinions.
You can PUSH your 34. They now offer an upgrade that replaces all the CTD stuff for High-Speed & Low-Speed adjustment.
 

ZHendo

Turbo Monkey
Oct 29, 2006
1,661
147
PNW
The Pike and XFusion are by far the best priced options that I have - I talked to the BOS distributor and prices on those forks are no joke. I'm still kicking options around, I wish PUSH sold a 34 that was already fully kitted out with the aftermarket adjusters.
 

slyfink

Turbo Monkey
Sep 16, 2008
9,323
5,074
Ottawa, Canada
I have the Pike and my buddy has the 650b version of the X-Fusion Slant (came on his Rocky Mountain Altitude). I've had mine longer (ridden 4.5 months), and have managed to blow it up once. He's had his essentially for one riding trip to BC for a week. Which is sort of like a month and a half of riding back home! We both have equal grins on our faces at the end of the ride.

I was going to refer you to that Bike Magic comparison... the guy at the end said he'd keep the Slant given the choice, even though performance wise they were almost identical, he doesn't explain why.

I'd suggest that it comes down to ease of service and/or who can fix/service it for you should you need it.
 

ZHendo

Turbo Monkey
Oct 29, 2006
1,661
147
PNW
I am equally comfortable working on Rockshox and XFusion, which again complicates things - I will be doing all of my own services on these forks, and I imagine that the relatively simple damper in the XFusion would make for some super easy rebuilds. I just can't get over how much of a steal the XFusions are...
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
85,883
24,464
media blackout
Air can size is not really related to the weight of the rider, just to the leverage rate of the frame, but in any case it would be worth checking.
if he was running too high a pressure to get the proper sag and prevent it from bottoming out, then it could certainly be a factor
 

cowman

Monkey
Oct 17, 2004
227
2
Seattle, WA
if he was running too high a pressure to get the proper sag and prevent it from bottoming out, then it could certainly be a factor
Agreed. I'd imagine if air can size affects the progressiveness of the spring rate, that it would have at least some influence on how much sag is achieved at a certain air pressure.
 

slyfink

Turbo Monkey
Sep 16, 2008
9,323
5,074
Ottawa, Canada
Define 'blow up' purty please.
I'm not sure what happened exactly, all I know is that the distributor replaced two cartridges (I'm assuming rebound and compression). How it happened was that I was night riding, and I took a little kicker slightly too fast and slightly off kilter from my usual position. I dead-sailored, and landed rear wheel first, and when my front wheel came down, it bottomed out hard. Hard enough to pinch flat my tubeless setup and loose all air. After I put a tube in and went to get going again, I noticed that my rebound damping wasn't working and the adjuster knob had no more "clicks" to it. Sent it in, they replaced all that needed replacing, and I haven't been able to ride since. well, I rode last night, but it was 1.4°F out, so not much was moving in the fork... and the surface was beautifully smooth, snowshoe-packed snow.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
I'm not sure what happened exactly, all I know is that the distributor replaced two cartridges (I'm assuming rebound and compression). How it happened was that I was night riding, and I took a little kicker slightly too fast and slightly off kilter from my usual position. I dead-sailored, and landed rear wheel first, and when my front wheel came down, it bottomed out hard. Hard enough to pinch flat my tubeless setup and loose all air. After I put a tube in and went to get going again, I noticed that my rebound damping wasn't working and the adjuster knob had no more "clicks" to it. Sent it in, they replaced all that needed replacing, and I haven't been able to ride since. well, I rode last night, but it was 1.4°F out, so not much was moving in the fork... and the surface was beautifully smooth, snowshoe-packed snow.
Sounds like a fox rear air shock in one week of life.
 

gemini2k

Turbo Monkey
Jul 31, 2005
3,526
117
San Francisco
This. Cautiously stoked about this upcoming set of forks.

Agreed, my number one complaint with the Dorado would likely be less of an issue in a trail fork (lack of mid stroke support). The mattoc may be my next fork. I found out this week that pricing won't be too ridiculous.
 

Kanye West

220# bag of hacktastic
Aug 31, 2006
3,741
473
if he was running too high a pressure to get the proper sag and prevent it from bottoming out, then it could certainly be a factor
The Rune frame (and any frame with this same U shaped leverage curve like the Sunday's and a low average leverage) are a real PITA to tune for.

On my X-Fusion Vector rear shock, I've pretty much got the main shimstack at the lightest tune possible, and feel like it could be even lighter still. The mid-stroke just hits a wall going over chatter, but then it still bottoms out easily if you blow past that. Also haven't found a really good sag measurement for it yet.

The rest of the frame is good. REALLY good. Awesome geo, super stiff, excellent and stable cornering. Just need to get it floating through the rough stuff a little better.

G2K's CCDB definitely feels like crap on that frame. We tried a bunch of different air pressures and settings. When you hit edges the shock just feels sorta constipated, but then still bottoms out.
 

troy

Turbo Monkey
Dec 3, 2008
1,008
742
The Rune frame (and any frame with this same U shaped leverage curve like the Sunday's and a low average leverage) are a real PITA to tune for.

On my X-Fusion Vector rear shock, I've pretty much got the main shimstack at the lightest tune possible, and feel like it could be even lighter still. The mid-stroke just hits a wall going over chatter, but then it still bottoms out easily if you blow past that. Also haven't found a really good sag measurement for it yet.

The rest of the frame is good. REALLY good. Awesome geo, super stiff, excellent and stable cornering. Just need to get it floating through the rough stuff a little better.

G2K's CCDB definitely feels like crap on that frame. We tried a bunch of different air pressures and settings. When you hit edges the shock just feels sorta constipated, but then still bottoms out.
You should try some really progressive airshock, DHXA? Or change an aircan in CCDB to a small one. You wont be able to tune correctly ANY shock if You won't figure out pressure/springrate 1st.
 

Steve M

Turbo Monkey
Mar 3, 2007
1,991
45
Whistler
if he was running too high a pressure to get the proper sag and prevent it from bottoming out, then it could certainly be a factor
For a given air can size, pressure at a given percentage of sag will be proportional to the pressure at bottom out. Whether the pressure at sag is 50psi or 250psi is irrelevant. Matching the air can size to the frame matters for sure, but rider weight simply scales the pressure up or down, it doesn't change the proportions of the spring curve that you need.

Edit: Let's say you want to run 25% sag, and at a weight of 150lbs with a certain air sleeve, you need to run 125psi. At bottom out, the positive pressure in the air spring might reach say 375psi (three times the pressure that you measure with the shock topped out, when you're pumping it up). If you're 300lbs instead of 150, you'll need to run 250psi instead of 125psi to achieve the same sag. Because the compression ratio of the spring is a fixed value for this air sleeve, you'll reach 750psi at bottom out instead of 375psi. Double the rider weight, double the pressures, double the forces. What you need to be matching up is the PROPORTIONS of sag pressure to bottom out pressure that you need to get out of the shock once the leverage rate is considered. That proportion is what the air can size affects. Whether you weigh 100lbs or 300lbs is irrelevant because you'll simply scale the pressures up or down to match your weight, but the frame you're on affects the relative values of the forces going into the shock at different points in the travel.

If you are reaching the point where the pressure you require from your shock is higher than the shock's rated maximum, then unfortunately you need a different frame/shock combination.
 
Last edited:

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
My friend's Pike did this - does that count?
Nope. that's kind of what I was asking originally. Seal problems are not 'blowing up'. A lot of people don't seem to understand that.

That's a cool trick though. I wanna try it. :D

What the hell caused that? You think it was binding with the lowers flexing on the stanchions or just a crappy seal seat tolerance?
 

supercow

Monkey
Feb 18, 2009
969
128
Nope. that's kind of what I was asking originally. Seal problems are not 'blowing up'. A lot of people don't seem to understand that.

That's a cool trick though. I wanna try it. :D

What the hell caused that? You think it was binding with the lowers flexing on the stanchions or just a crappy seal seat tolerance?
JRA caused it - he did a small step up (5feet or something) landed it smooth and it went pop.

He had to get a new air cart for it as well!
 
Last edited:

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
85,883
24,464
media blackout
For a given air can size, pressure at a given percentage of sag will be proportional to the pressure at bottom out. Whether the pressure at sag is 50psi or 250psi is irrelevant. Matching the air can size to the frame matters for sure, but rider weight simply scales the pressure up or down, it doesn't change the proportions of the spring curve that you need.

Edit: Let's say you want to run 25% sag, and at a weight of 150lbs with a certain air sleeve, you need to run 125psi. At bottom out, the positive pressure in the air spring might reach say 375psi (three times the pressure that you measure with the shock topped out, when you're pumping it up). If you're 300lbs instead of 150, you'll need to run 250psi instead of 125psi to achieve the same sag. Because the compression ratio of the spring is a fixed value for this air sleeve, you'll reach 750psi at bottom out instead of 375psi. Double the rider weight, double the pressures, double the forces. What you need to be matching up is the PROPORTIONS of sag pressure to bottom out pressure that you need to get out of the shock once the leverage rate is considered. That proportion is what the air can size affects. Whether you weigh 100lbs or 300lbs is irrelevant because you'll simply scale the pressures up or down to match your weight, but the frame you're on affects the relative values of the forces going into the shock at different points in the travel.

If you are reaching the point where the pressure you require from your shock is higher than the shock's rated maximum, then unfortunately you need a different frame/shock combination.
tl;dr i was alluding to the fact that if the can size was wrong, he might be trying to compensate for what is effectively an over/under sprung shock by adding/removing compression damping, which could be buggering things.
 

supercow

Monkey
Feb 18, 2009
969
128
So what you're saying is that it blew up. :D


Did he breach the air chamber? That's pretty manly. I definitely want to try that.
Haha, in a matter of speaking yes, she blew :P
Yea from what he said, the air chamber went fubarred - don;t have the exact details... happened on the run just after I left for home haha.