Quantcast

2015 Specialized Demo and Enduro Evo

peecee

Monkey
Apr 27, 2012
232
42
Australia
I see as soon as these went on the net they got taken off. Demo's look horrible.

Enduro looks fun, Im thinking the Boxxers on the front of the Enduro is a photoshop job as the front wheel looks bigger than the back one ?

overlap.jpg
cadre-demo-specialized-2015-2.jpg
cadre-demo-specialized-2015.jpg
demo-specialized-2015_big.jpg
demo-specialized-2015-2.jpg
demo-specialized-2015-3.jpg
2015-Specialized-Enduro-Evo.jpg
Unknown.jpeg
 
Last edited:

peecee

Monkey
Apr 27, 2012
232
42
Australia
Not photoshop. I posted on MTBR, and got a pm from francois about taking them down.

Here are some on my fb page - https://www.facebook.com/TheBicycleGarage
Ah that sucks, I keep seeing the link which doesn't exist anymore, did the carbons demos get leaked too ?

The way Aaron was talking about a new bike I thought it was a complete redesign not just bigger wheels, unless there just teasing us until the later rounds of the world cup.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
The way Aaron was talking about a new bike I thought it was a complete redesign not just bigger wheels, unless there just teasing us until the later rounds of the world cup.
It may not look like it since it's the same general shape, but with how short the d8 chainstays are, how forward that axle path is, and trying to fit a 27.5 wheel in there........they completely redesigned the rear end :D
 

mtdh

Chimp
Nov 11, 2013
17
0
Vancouver
The Enduro looks like something else..more like a park bike. No dropper post is a good clue. The shock at the U link is slightly closer to the frame so they may have extended the travel 1/4" so the travel is close to 8".
 

4130biker

PM me about Tantrum Cycles!
May 24, 2007
3,884
450
That slaughter tire makes the bikes look weird. Specialized is the devil!
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
It may not look like it since it's the same general shape, but with how short the d8 chainstays are, how forward that axle path is, and trying to fit a 27.5 wheel in there........they completely redesigned the rear end :D
It's not that forward. It's just not very rearward. There are some frames that are known for being rearward but in the last part of travel they are very forward (much more than the demo) but yeah, they have to do some serious redesigning for the 27.5.
 
Last edited:

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
It's not that forward. It's just not very rearward. There are some frames that are known for being rearward but in the last part of travel they are very forward (much more than the demo) but yeah, they have to do some serious redesigning for the 27.5.
It's like an inch forward. That's a lot when you're trying to cram another inch and a half of pure marketing bliss into a 16.5 chainstay.
 

jackalope

Mental acuity - 1%
Jan 9, 2004
7,608
5,924
in a single wide, cooking meth...
Meh, I was really hoping they would take the front triangle of a 29er Epic and lash it onto a 650 Enduro rear triangle, then call it the Epic Enduro. Definitely have to staff up the legal department if/when that happens.
 

marshalolson

Turbo Monkey
May 25, 2006
1,770
519
I'll guess $9k, they seemed to have the old sworks left at 10k so they've prob hit a ceiling there.
My point in the other thread is that the demo is currently their cheapest full suspension s-works bike.

The current demo is also cheaper than the trek 9.9, v10, etc.... And that does matter.
 
Last edited:

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
It's like an inch forward. That's a lot when you're trying to cram another inch and a half of pure marketing bliss into a 16.5 chainstay.
Are you sure? I may have been looking at the older demo but I remember it went backward and forward very little and that was the reason they advertised FSR as having vertical axle path. An inch is a ton of forward movment. Will have to look that up when I'm back in home
 
Last edited:

mtdh

Chimp
Nov 11, 2013
17
0
Vancouver
Whoever plotted this got it wrong in a big way LOL. Axle path variation is about 15-17 mm in total. Don't have the demo one here but this one is 2013 Evo expert with a variation of 14 mm
 

Sugar_brad

Monkey
Jun 20, 2009
328
6
That main pivot is pretty low and rearward. It may not be a full inch but it sure as shlt ain't 'vertical'.
Haha that reminds me of the "S"
path that VPP supposedly followed back in the day. Don't you love the bike industry?
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
Haha that reminds me of the "S"
path that VPP supposedly followed back in the day. Don't you love the bike industry?
I thought the patent mentioned it (either as a feature or as a 'necessary byproduct') as something essential to the function. I know the dh bikes had kind of a neutered version but didn't the trail bikes actually have an S-like path?

It's the kind of thing Udi would know but he was like 13 at the time, and taking internet mountain biking WAY too seriously.......:D
 
Last edited:

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator

I now respectfully offer to film JoeG riding the same section of sharp rocks on a specialized demo, and then a canfield Jedi. Or a foes dhs and then a single pivot turner dhr. Same shocks if possible. The stipulation being that we can only discuss what is shown in video. :D

Come on Joe, where are ya?

Good to see him address the claimed S shape of the old V10. I think even at the time everyone was even calling that one a partial S. That was back when specialized bikes were "completely vertical" so there was certainly worse.
 
Last edited:

joeg

I have some obvious biases
Jul 20, 2011
198
137
Santa Cruz CA
I now respectfully offer to film JoeG riding the same section of sharp rocks on a specialized demo, and then a canfield Jedi. Or a foes dhs and then a single pivot turner dhr. Same shocks if possible. The stipulation being that we can only discuss what is shown in video. :D

Come on Joe, where are ya?

Good to see him address the claimed S shape of the old V10. I think even at the time everyone was even calling that one a partial S. That was back when specialized bikes were "completely vertical" so there was certainly worse.
those 3 have the same shock rate, or are we comparing different axle paths with different shock rates at the same time?
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
YES!! Damn dude, that was quick.

Totally different I'm sure.

But it'll be those sweet sweet hips I'll be focusing on. I tried to pick some widely varying models to go to each end of the spectrum...... That should reduce the effect of leverage rates since they's REAL different. Science!
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
those 3 have the same shock rate, or are we comparing different axle paths with different shock rates at the same time?
I'm pretty sure we can find a bikes that could be used for Kidwoos example. I remember that k9 guy that wrote for dirt mag (Louis Arraiz if I remember right) claiming the shock rate on 2010 demo and Empire Ap-1 is fairly similar. The axle path isn't.
 
Last edited:

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
And once again norbar proves he's pretty valuable at knowing some obscure random shlt that no one cares about...........but is surprisingly relevant to whatever point he's trying to make once you figure out what he's talking about. :D
 
Last edited:

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
And once again norbar proves he's pretty valuable at knowing some obscure random shlt that no one cares about...........but is surprisingly relevant to whatever point he's trying to make once you figure out what he's talking about. :D
I was actually trying to help you prove the point you tried to prove but yeah I'd be curious how 2 bikes with similar leverage, same shock and specs but different axle path ride.
 

Udi

RM Chief Ornithologist
Mar 14, 2005
4,915
1,200
Basically, the center of your rear wheel can't move much more than 20mm in distance from the center of the bottom bracket or your pedals feel like they are getting tugged around a lot.
The truth is that axle path should be a result of other parameters, not a goal in itself. Therefore, axle path doesn't matter.
Not enough that it's really going to mean the difference between a good bike and a crappy bike. Or that something "pedals great" or "is neutral under braking" - whatever that means. That's bogus.
Make up a simple, believable reason why a product is superior. And then repeat those reasons over and over until they become accepted as common knowledge despite the lack of real justification.
It looks like they've set themselves up solidly for another apology article in the future.