Quantcast

Coffee Coffee Coffee

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
This is the shit. And strong. Peet's in general is my favorite, but just tried this one on my trip

Deep roast meaning it's darkly roasted? Dark roasts are unhealthy as fuck. It's basically the equivalent of ordering a well done steak.


@mandown - it's so easy to use the wrong coffee for cold brew. I still wonder how popular light roasting is in the US. You have a strong coffee culture but I don't hear about light roasting that much on us forums.
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
lol yeah the local nickname for starbucks is Charbucks.
I know they roast their beans in yurp in a roaster for peanuts because no coffee roasting machine is big enough.

Also they burn them to hell so you can taste the coffee from under a gallon of milk.
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
Let's see, you're doing all this fussy brewing crap and you pollute the coffee with milk? :rolleyes:
Who claimed that? I'm saying starbucks roasts it darkly because it's the only way you will feel there is some coffee under that milk.

I drink my coffee with no sugar and no milk. No need if you have a light roast. You should be able to taste the fruits in coffee.
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
I'll think about that as I enjoy my French roast.
I seriously encourage you to visit a coffee shop that has light roasts. When you find a good lightly roasted coffee you never go back. Seriously I don't know one person who went to darkly roasted coffee. Some who like it a bit dry and bitter just went with natural instead of washed coffee.
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
A local restaurant that I frequent stopped serving dark roast. I quit drinking coffee there and get fruit juice instead.
I'm yet to meet a restaurant that makes good coffee. Even michelin starred restaurants usually serve crap so that's a bad example. A good coffee shop that makes and grind you fresh coffee. I know everyone in America is used to cheap, old robusta beans, it's the same in Poland so everyone thinks coffee should be dark and bitter and shitty coffees (Italians with their constant nagging that their shitty coffee is best don't help the matter) trying to ride the trend of third weave coffee don't help but it's really worth a try.

The best way would be to visit Oslo, Stockholm, Berlin or now even Warsaw but I'm pretty sure it's not that hard given the world barista championship took place in Seattle in 2015. Even if that's the shittiest discipline of all coffee competitions.

btw. Most roasts labeled as light in starbucks and big brands (any brand that doesn't give you a roast date) are actually medium roasts.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
Deep roast meaning it's darkly roasted? Dark roasts are unhealthy as fuck. It's basically the equivalent of ordering a well done steak.
It's counter-intuitive, but light roast is unhealthy as fuck.

http://www.healwithfood.org/articles/coffee-acrylamide-levels.php

Dark roast lower in acrylamide than regular roast
So what about dark versus regular roast? According to an analysis based on the FDA data, dark-roasted beans seem to contain lower levels of acrylamide. This (perhaps surprising) observation is confirmed by a joint-study conducted by the European Commission and Nestlé Product Technology. The researchers responsible for the study found that light-roasted coffee beans tend to contain relatively higher amounts of acrylamide than dark-roasted beans(4). Why? According to research, acrylamide is formed at the beginning of the coffee bean roasting cycle and it declines steeply toward to end of the process due to higher rates of elimination.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
Also coffee is only like well-done steak in that it has PAHs, it doesn't contain HCAs like high-temp cooked meat products. Meat products do not have a problem with acrylamide like coffee does.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643812003519

Conclusion
There was no correlation between the PAHs levels detected and the coffees roasting degree. A high variability of the results within the same cultivar and roasting degree, submitted to the same brewing procedure was verified.

Although the formation of a caffeine-PAH complex could facilitate PAHs transfer from the ground roasted coffee to the brew, the caffeine levels in the beverages do not seem to influence the transfer.

PAHs levels present in the coffee brew samples analyzed may be considered low when comparing with the maximum permitted levels in the Brazilian regulation or with those established in Europe for different foods (CEC, 2011). It is expected that these levels would not affect the intake of PAHs by the Brazilian population; however, it is important to have and provide information related to potentially carcinogenic compounds in highly consumed food.
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
Also coffee is only like well-done steak in that it has PAHs, it doesn't contain HCAs like high-temp cooked meat products. Meat products do not have a problem with acrylamide like coffee does.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643812003519
The well done steak was a taste comparison. If coffee is darkly roasted you don't taste the coffee you taste the roast. It kills the taste profile. That is why it's the same as a well done steak. A well done steak also could be done from shitty meat and you wouldn't notice. It's the same with dark roasts.


As for your sources man the study was done by NESTLE. So of course it's in their interest to claim dark roast is equal or better because roasting beans dark allows them to buy cheaper coffee and roast them with less care. You could cherry pick the marigns of what is treated as light and dark roasting. I'm yet to meet a high level coffee roasting/brewing class that supports those claims. I trust people who work with coffee more than random corporate sponsored research.

Also during the proces of roasting with dark roasts you loose many beneficial acids, proteins, anti-oxidants.

Remember that world roasting championship hasn't been won by a dark roast yet.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
As for your sources man the study was done by NESTLE. So of course it's in their interest to claim dark roast is equal or better because roasting beans dark allows them to buy cheaper coffee and roast them with less care. You could cherry pick the marigns of what is treated as light and dark roasting. I'm yet to meet a high level coffee roasting/brewing class that supports those claims. I trust people who work with coffee more than random corporate sponsored research.
The FDA analysis found the same thing and there was no partnership with Nestle there. There's more carcinogens in light roast coffee but instant coffee (which Nestle should favor since only the mass-market favors it) is the worst in that regard than either ground roast style. I trust scientists more than stupid coffee hipsters.

With PAHs there's no correlation with roast type. Flavor doesn't have correlation with how healthy something is either.
 
Last edited:

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
The FDA analysis found the same thing and there was no partnership with Nestle there. There's more carcinogens in light roast coffee but instant coffee (which Nestle should favor since only the mass-market favors it) is the worst in that regard than either ground roast style. I trust scientists more than stupid coffee hipsters.

With PAHs there's no correlation with roast type. Flavor doesn't have correlation with how healthy something is either.
The thing is those people are usually rather old and have been in the industry for ages but it's good to assume it's another silly barista doing porn on the side. I trust people who read more about it than me and spend a bit more time with it than a simple google search.

As for flavor I was talking about pure flavor, don't care about health. The coparison with steak was for pure flavour sake. Any food that is burned tastes the same. Ie like coal. I really don't want to argue about health and sorry for bringing it up since none of us is really qualified here. I've read conflicting studies about carcinogens in coffee and we would probably have to read the methodology to see what's the differenciating factor there.

I'd rather talk about taste. I know it's subjective but i still don't get why you are so convinced that dark roast is the only way to go.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
I'd rather talk about taste. I know it's subjective but i still don't get why you are so convinced that dark roast is the only way to go.
I stated that it's more healthy since you incorrectly stated that. I don't think dark is the only way to go and never said it was. Just like beer, wine, pot, cheese, whatever peoples tastes are personal with regional influences and tend to follow trends from so-called connoisseurs/experts.

Like HAB I can't drink much coffee because of heartburn (I have EE, and started having problems with heartburn in the summer of 2001). I like coffee and other foods and beverages with caffeine in them, but they don't like me. Supposedly there's some new steroid treatment I can take for it, but not sure if I want the roids yet.
 
Last edited:

skibunny24

Enthusiastic Receiver of Reputation
Jun 16, 2010
3,281
585
Renton, WA
Deep roast meaning it's darkly roasted? Dark roasts are unhealthy as fuck. It's basically the equivalent of ordering a well done steak.
.
I drink my dark roast and medium roasts black, I personally find it is the water to grounds ratio that makes the biggest difference. BUT, what the fuck are you talking about unhealthy coffee? I consider myself fairly health educated and now must do more research. I looked up this Acrylamide crap and it looks like it is only in foods cooked above 120 degrees (F). Are the medium/light roasts roasted at a lower temp, or just less time?
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
I drink my dark roast and medium roasts black, I personally find it is the water to grounds ratio that makes the biggest difference. BUT, what the fuck are you talking about unhealthy coffee? I consider myself fairly health educated and now must do more research. I looked up this Acrylamide crap and it looks like it is only in foods cooked above 120 degrees (F). Are the medium/light roasts roasted at a lower temp, or just less time?
If you read the thread, you find that's a false assumption. Light roasts, especially instant, have higher levels, not lower levels:

The researchers responsible for the study found that light-roasted coffee beans tend to contain relatively higher amounts of acrylamide than dark-roasted beans(4). Why? According to research, acrylamide is formed at the beginning of the coffee bean roasting cycle and it declines steeply toward to end of the process due to higher rates of elimination.
Light roasts do have more flavors and antioxidants like norbar mentioned, but they also have more acrylamide. Nobody has studied antioxidants levels in coffee vs carcinogens as far as which is more important. Basically you will have to go with personal flavor preference, since coffee is protective against certain diseases but bad for others like many foods and drinks with mixed messaging (and they also depend on dosage etc etc).

http://www.foodnavigator.com/Science/Reducing-coffee-s-acrylamide-may-also-hit-flavour-antioxidants
 
Last edited:

skibunny24

Enthusiastic Receiver of Reputation
Jun 16, 2010
3,281
585
Renton, WA
My standart is their French roast; guess I'll have to try the Yosemite iff'en I can find it east.
'Tis available to all coast lines: http://www.peets.com/yosemite-dos-sierras.html

If you read the thread, you find that's a false assumption. Light roasts, especially instant, have higher levels, not lower levels:
I did read, I just get confused by all the jibber jabber ;) The article you found was helpful. I'm just going to keep drink the coffee that tastes decent. No beuno on the instant coffee for backpacking though!
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
I did read, I just get confused by all the jibber jabber ;) The article you found was helpful. I'm just going to keep drink the coffee that tastes decent. No beuno on the instant coffee for backpacking though!
Right, I edited my comment above, flavor is the best way since there are health impacts and benefits depending on the diseases (and dosage) in question.

Fights some cancers, does nothing for others, might be bad for some:

For hepatocellular and endometrial cancers, there appears to be a strong and consistent protective association; for colorectal cancer, the direction of association is borderline protective. There appears to be no association with breast, pancreatic, kidney, ovarian, prostate, or gastric cancer. Risk of bladder cancer appears to be associated with heavy coffee consumption in some populations and among men. The associations with childhood leukemia and mother's consumption of coffee were ambiguous-with some suggestion of risk at high levels of daily consumption.
Might be bad for blood pressure and cholesterol (especially without paper filters) but generally good for cardiovascular disease.
 
Last edited:

skibunny24

Enthusiastic Receiver of Reputation
Jun 16, 2010
3,281
585
Renton, WA
^^Bummer!

So, coffee, like microwaves and non-organic produce, causes cancer. Got it. :tinfoil:

Non-coffee alternatives? Carcinogenic or otherwise--go! (Always curious what there might be...)
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
^^Bummer!

So, coffee, like microwaves and non-organic produce, causes cancer. Got it. :tinfoil:

Non-coffee alternatives? Carcinogenic or otherwise--go! (Always curious what there might be...)
Some cancers, not all and it depends on various factors. Just drink the more good coffee in moderation and you'll be ok or even be better off. This is true for some indulgences, but not all (all in moderation is a dumb saying)
 

berkshire_rider

Growler
Feb 5, 2003
2,552
10
The Blackstone Valley
Deep roast meaning it's darkly roasted? Dark roasts are unhealthy as fuck. It's basically the equivalent of ordering a well done steak.
There's a huge difference between that charbucks crap and a reputable coffee roaster who does dark roasts. There's plenty of Sumatra's around that you can taste the flavor of, similar to a lighter roast.
 

berkshire_rider

Growler
Feb 5, 2003
2,552
10
The Blackstone Valley
I'd rather talk about taste.only way to go.
A big reason why a lot of people's coffee doesn't taste very good is due to most people brewing with a shitty coffee maker. If you are going to brew at home and want simplicity, you should drop some $$$ and pickup a Technivorm or maybe a Bonavita that brews at a high enough temperature.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
drip maker died. couldn't be fixed. recommend me a new one.
8 cup Softbrew ($53 with free shipping) instead of a dripper (makes hot or cold, works with various grinds (not just coarse like french press), easy to clean(three parts), eco-friendly(no paper filters), doesn't leach estrogenic compounds (no plastic):
http://www.amazon.com/Sowden-Oskar-SoftBrew-Coffee-Maker/dp/B003VUZNUS/

If you don't have a gas stove with a tea kettle (cheaper unless you have solar), an electric kettle along with it like:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008YE3RNG

Only thing that makes better coffee, IMHO, is the Aeropress but that doesn't help when you need to make lots at once and it leaches estrogenic compounds (BPA-free, but Tritan still leaches other estrogenic compounds and PP is often problematic too).
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
85,982
24,535
media blackout
8 cup Softbrew ($53 with free shipping) instead of a dripper (makes hot or cold, works with various grinds (not just coarse like french press), easy to clean(three parts), eco-friendly(no paper filters), doesn't leach estrogenic compounds (no plastic):
http://www.amazon.com/Sowden-Oskar-SoftBrew-Coffee-Maker/dp/B003VUZNUS/

If you don't have a gas stove with a tea kettle (cheaper unless you have solar), an electric kettle along with it like:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008YE3RNG

Only thing that makes better coffee, IMHO, is the Aeropress but that doesn't help when you need to make lots at once and it leaches estrogenic compounds (BPA-free, but Tritan still leaches other estrogenic compounds and PP is often problematic too).
jtfc some days i swear you're illiterate.

i asked for a DRIP MAKER. Sometimes I have the need to make large quantities of coffee very quickly and easily. i've already got an aeropress, a presso, a siphon, and like 3 french presses.