Standards
- Thread starter Jm_
- Start date
look at those sparkly ball bearings!! ...or is that a sparkly peapod..
as opposed to the new 100mm. which is more like 4 inches
When this occurs you should simultaneously be rolling up your shirt sleeves.
The wife wasn't in the mood, but once I lubed up her internal grease sleeve she seemed much more willing.
Well, the XC logo seems to have snow capped peaks? Perhaps for use at only Megavalanche events?
Granted, I'm a little slow, but I found the packaging on a Shimano brake adapter that I purchased recently to be a little confusing.
F or R I guess means front or rear? Okay...
Measurements, sure I understand. But why are they 140, 160, 180 and then 203? What happened to 200?
P/S, P/P, S/P, S/S, S/B........yeah,sure. P for post?
Something similar to here:
F or R I guess means front or rear? Okay...
Measurements, sure I understand. But why are they 140, 160, 180 and then 203? What happened to 200?
P/S, P/P, S/P, S/S, S/B........yeah,sure. P for post?
Something similar to here:
those are millimeters. nothing happened to 200, it was never a standardized size. at least from shimano. 203mm=8"
edit: technically its 203.2mm
Winning "get off my lawn" quote of the day!
The cost, weight, and fail-ey-ness make it a lose-lose-lose IMO.
There where a couple of companys that did(does) 200mm and some that did 205mm. Just to make our lives easier...those are millimeters. nothing happened to 200, it was never a standardized size. at least from shimano. 203mm=8"
edit: technically its 203.2mm
Because 8" rotors were standardized before the intermediary sizes.It just makes no sense to go up in 20mm increments and then jump up 23mm from 180?
I must point out, Canadia uses metric.
Could you put that amount in moar conventional units, such as libraries of congress or football fields?
Mmmm, yes, there is that.