Quantcast

Whistler and the WC?

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
1,994
716
Is there ever been a reason that the world's biggest (right or wrong?) never hosted a WC race? I'm 100% certain that they have the resources. Imagine the turnout if they had a week filled with a World Cup race and Crankworks. Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday you sign up to do a clinic with your favorite WC racer or Crankworks rider (SGC?).

Alright, so even if it doesn't happen during Crankworks and they don't do clinics cause they're 100% focused on the race, is there any known reason that the WC is never at Whistler? They have the power and they have the staff.
 

SDet

Monkey
Nov 19, 2014
150
42
Boulder Co
I think it costs money to host a world Cup, and they go to the highest bidder. A mountain that already does great (Whistler) probably isn't up for that kind of deal.
 

Gary

"S" is for "neo-luddite"
Aug 27, 2002
7,620
5,541
UK
Same reasons shitey Fort William has held one every single year since 2002
 

FlipFantasia

Turbo Monkey
Oct 4, 2001
1,663
499
Sea to Sky BC
they've been close a few times, but the UCI's typicalness has resulted in the powers that be here basically saying eff you, we don't need the hassle...in addition to WB sponsor stuff vs. UCI/world cup sponsor stuff and whatnot, although sounds like that was workable. I think they'd still like to have one, I'd still like to see one, but really, Crankworx is already massively successful without it. Personally I want to see a world cup track into creekside now that it's up and running, big euro style speed and corners on lower franz's, and some new cut in tech in the woods....unfortunately new trail development off piste is a non starter until they get First Nations sign off on WB's Master Plan update, but that's been stalled for a couple years now.....
 

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
1,994
716
I don't think anyone has ever thought of this or discussed it before, great idea!
Does the UCI even know about Whistler?
I know! Right? That's why I figured I'd post it here in the forum of undisputed knowledgeable and intellectual geniuses! The replies so far are stacking up to about what I had expected with no answers to the question! Wow... I'm shocked!

As far as the other "It cost money and Whistler already has enough" reply, I've never heard of a company that said "I think we made too much this year. How can we cut back?"
 

manhattanprjkt83

Rusty Trombone
Jul 10, 2003
9,644
1,214
Nilbog
they've been close a few times, but the UCI's typicalness has resulted in the powers that be here basically saying eff you, we don't need the hassle...in addition to WB sponsor stuff vs. UCI/world cup sponsor stuff and whatnot, although sounds like that was workable. I think they'd still like to have one, I'd still like to see one, but really, Crankworx is already massively successful without it. Personally I want to see a world cup track into creekside now that it's up and running, big euro style speed and corners on lower franz's, and some new cut in tech in the woods....unfortunately new trail development off piste is a non starter until they get First Nations sign off on WB's Master Plan update, but that's been stalled for a couple years now.....

The day creekside was announced I said the same thing, world cup...perfect for it over there and wouldn't interrupt BP operations. So the creekside development plan is on hold? Cmon, that's a bummer.
 

manhattanprjkt83

Rusty Trombone
Jul 10, 2003
9,644
1,214
Nilbog
I know! Right? That's why I figured I'd post it here in the forum of undisputed knowledgeable and intellectual geniuses! The replies so far are stacking up to about what I had expected with no answers to the question! Wow... I'm shocked!

As far as the other "It cost money and Whistler already has enough" reply, I've never heard of a company that said "I think we made too much this year. How can we cut back?"
The short answer always repeated... There was never a reason to have a WC. The UCI is a major PITA and WBP rakes in the cash during regular operations, why shut down the bike park to host the race? If you have been around for the garbo race you would know that it really interrupts the park with trail closures. Shutting down the BP for 4-5 days for the race probably doesn't make sense to them at all...That is why creekside would make so much sense, it's kind of it's own isolated area and lift.
 
Last edited:

gemini2k

Turbo Monkey
Jul 31, 2005
3,526
117
San Francisco
You realize that Crankworks is already the biggest week of the year in whistler right? You want to make it even more of a shit show with no appreciably benefit? That's stupid.
 

manhattanprjkt83

Rusty Trombone
Jul 10, 2003
9,644
1,214
Nilbog
You realize that Crankworks is already the biggest week of the year in whistler right? You want to make it even more of a shit show with no appreciably benefit? That's stupid.
I would guess if there is ever a WC at Whistler it would be during a time totally independent of cworx, that would be a mess...over stimulation.
 

djjohnr

Turbo Monkey
Apr 21, 2002
3,011
1,704
Northern California
You guys are all missing the big picture. Now that xHamster is getting involved in mountain bike racing what we should be really asking for is moving the Adult Entertainment Expo to Whistler.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
You realize that Crankworks is already the biggest week of the year in whistler right? You want to make it even more of a shit show with no appreciably benefit? That's stupid.


All they have to do is a one off course on blackcomb. They're running lifts to get to the glacier anyway.

It's essentially what a lot of the other venues do.

Not only would it not interfere with the bike park, it would probably get more tickets sold for it that week. It would make everyone with a business in that little blackcomb base area pretty happy.


Throwing it in with crankworx would be kind of absurd IMO. It could be their "other" huge week some other time.

Get the 4x pro tour in there too. Because hey, czech money spends too.
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,364
1,602
Warsaw :/
Why would whistler want to give money to the UCI douchebags? If they want super big tournouts they can host a super duper whistlerpalooza race themselves and rake in as much money without sponsoring bike antichrist
 

manhattanprjkt83

Rusty Trombone
Jul 10, 2003
9,644
1,214
Nilbog
Because at the end of the day it is the world cup. I don't want much to do with cworx this days but I would want to check out a Whistler UCI event...
 

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
1,994
716
To be honest, I never meant why doesn't Whistler pay the Uci. But rather has the Uci ever approached Whistler about having a race there.

As far as Creekside being open- Whistler had a video on FB about it and showed some really fun looking trails. Someone asked if it was going to be open this year, to which they replied 'yes'.

Idk?
 

shirk007

Monkey
Apr 14, 2009
499
354
I don't think the UCI approaches venues. Venues approach the UCI. And when you approach the UCI make sure you have briefcases full of cash.
 

RayB

Monkey
Jan 31, 2008
744
95
Seattle
There's basically no incentive, financial or otherwise, for Whistler to host a UCI-sanctioned World Cup DH event.

Interestingly enough, the prize purse for Crankworx events are getting pretty sizeable (especially if you factor in the "King of Crankworx" title as well) that I could see more World Cup dudes* show up and try to throw down for the money.

(* Probably not Aaron Gwin tho... that dude's gonna be swimming in money at his new custom home...)
 

FlipFantasia

Turbo Monkey
Oct 4, 2001
1,663
499
Sea to Sky BC
Is that the whole mountain or just some specific zones?


I did notice the uh........out in the openess of the creekside trails last year.
It's semi-complicated, basically the ski runs are considered existing developed, so building a trail on it isn't considered new development, and new trail development within Fitz/garbo/peak is considered allowed under their current master plan so they'll continue in those zones. Creekside is considered new in their master plan update so off-piste new singeltrack development is verboten....It's also why they've put money into upgrading/rerouting/maintaing previously 'unsanctioned' trails within their Controlled Recreation Area (Khyber Pass/Ride Don't Slide/Kashmir/BCs) as opposed to building new singletrack at this point.
 

kickstand

Turbo Monkey
Sep 18, 2009
3,441
392
Fenton, MI
I know! Right? That's why I figured I'd post it here in the forum of undisputed knowledgeable and intellectual geniuses! The replies so far are stacking up to about what I had expected with no answers to the question! Wow... I'm shocked!

As far as the other "It cost money and Whistler already has enough" reply, I've never heard of a company that said "I think we made too much this year. How can we cut back?"
Well it's been stated hundreds of time that they can make as much or more money without the hassle of the uci don't be mad people are giving you the same answer again
 

maxyedor

<b>TOOL PRO</b>
Oct 20, 2005
5,496
3,141
In the bathroom, fighting a battle
Whistler has a finite number of hotel rooms, camp sites and restaurants. Therefore a finite number of guests can be hosted at any given time without having to build new infrastructure. Seeing as how most of the hospitality is occupied over the summer by people buying lift tickets and overpriced beer already, what good would it do to pay the UCI a bunch of money, and then fill a large portion of those rooms and restaurant seats with team personnel and media who likely wont be buying a lift ticket, or spending money at bars and bike shops. Status quo for the local businesses, and a loser for the mountain. Other resorts use it as a promotional tool to attract crowds the rest of the season, but as it stands, Whistler doesn't exactly have a problem attracting crowds. They'd be pissing away money purely for prestige, a prestige most would argue is already outweighed by that of Crankworks.
 

manhattanprjkt83

Rusty Trombone
Jul 10, 2003
9,644
1,214
Nilbog
This thread has me thinking about how unexciting the WC schedule has been the past few years. It's the same old every year...Would be so great to see a true WC circuit come back to life...Asia, South America, actually use some of these great North American mountains and build some fresh tracks...Instead it's the euro states point series.
 

manhattanprjkt83

Rusty Trombone
Jul 10, 2003
9,644
1,214
Nilbog
It's semi-complicated, basically the ski runs are considered existing developed, so building a trail on it isn't considered new development, and new trail development within Fitz/garbo/peak is considered allowed under their current master plan so they'll continue in those zones. Creekside is considered new in their master plan update so off-piste new singeltrack development is verboten....It's also why they've put money into upgrading/rerouting/maintaing previously 'unsanctioned' trails within their Controlled Recreation Area (Khyber Pass/Ride Don't Slide/Kashmir/BCs) as opposed to building new singletrack at this point.
Thanks man, weird to me though. If you are going to spin the lift cut a couple 4 ft wide trails down that beauty of a mountain side.

So it was a game changer for you because you could access the park so much easier instead of pedaling into the village?
 

FlipFantasia

Turbo Monkey
Oct 4, 2001
1,663
499
Sea to Sky BC
Thanks man, weird to me though. If you are going to spin the lift cut a couple 4 ft wide trails down that beauty of a mountain side.

So it was a game changer for you because you could access the park so much easier instead of pedaling into the village?
well, they did cut Dusty's Descent, although some people bitch about it being lame, I actually love having some wide open blasters on the ski run....it was a game changer as I generally avoid the village at all costs and found myself not going to the bikepark as much because fitz chair was getting really busy more often. Creekside is my access in the winter, so this made it easy for bikepark, especially since they actually bumped extended play start to 4:30 instead of 5 so people in the south end of town could at least get an uplift on creekside before they close for the evening. then you can hit garbo laps without going to village and then ride out back home.
 

manhattanprjkt83

Rusty Trombone
Jul 10, 2003
9,644
1,214
Nilbog
My time in Whistler this year was spent from basically the day Creekside closed into October so I actually never rode it. I will get to ride over that way this year a bit and looking forward to it. You being a local, I can see how that would be a game changer keeping you out of the mid summer circus. Hopefully they put some gusto into the trail plan for that side and develop some fresh tech, would really add another dimension to the park.
 

gemini2k

Turbo Monkey
Jul 31, 2005
3,526
117
San Francisco
All they have to do is a one off course on blackcomb. They're running lifts to get to the glacier anyway.

It's essentially what a lot of the other venues do.
Yeah doing it another week could be cool, but not at the same time as Crankworks. Hotels are already sold out that week anyways.
 

Udi

RM Chief Ornithologist
Mar 14, 2005
4,915
1,200
All I've gathered from this thread is that Whistler should schedule Crankworx to overlap a big UCI WC date, and offer even more exorbitant prizes so that all the WC racers flock to Crankworx instead. Maybe even add a few more conveniently overlapping crankworx rounds.

At this point Mr. UCI will throw his baguette on the floor in disgust and potentially come to Whistler with a briefcase full of cash instead of vice versa.

Then we intercept the guy (or get @gemini2k to since he's 7.5ft tall), steal his briefcase, and split the cash evenly between thread contributors.
 

SDet

Monkey
Nov 19, 2014
150
42
Boulder Co
I know! Right? That's why I figured I'd post it here in the forum of undisputed knowledgeable and intellectual geniuses! The replies so far are stacking up to about what I had expected with no answers to the question! Wow... I'm shocked!

As far as the other "It cost money and Whistler already has enough" reply, I've never heard of a company that said "I think we made too much this year. How can we cut back?"
It's more " we make x per weekend, and if we give you $, we get to spend money building a track, and have half the mountain closed on race weekend, and make less money, after spending more than normal?" good plan
 

4130biker

PM me about Tantrum Cycles!
May 24, 2007
3,884
449
Maybe I'm getting the scale of things all wrong from marketing hype, but it seems like the EWS stepped up and UCI lost out on this Enduro thing.

It also seems like everyone would like to see more WC rounds and that the UCI is just money hungry.
Now that EWS is established, If every WC DH athlete jumped ship at the same time for a downhill series run by the EWS (DWS :brows:), the UCI couldn't do shit about it, right? I think others have alluded to something like this previously on RM, but why not? The industry switched to 27.5 out of the blue, why not ditch the UCI for more profits?
 

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,364
1,602
Warsaw :/
Because at the end of the day it is the world cup. I don't want much to do with cworx this days but I would want to check out a Whistler UCI event...
But you are not one whistler owners or mangers. If you want to see a world cup buy a plane ticket. Put yourself in Whistler ppls place. UCI has on numerous ocasions tried to pressure Whistler like with their stupid idea to treaten riders enterining non UCI sanctioned races with exclusion and fines (and UCI sanctioned race = give money to the UCI)

To be honest, I never meant why doesn't Whistler pay the Uci. But rather has the Uci ever approached Whistler about having a race there.

As far as Creekside being open- Whistler had a video on FB about it and showed some really fun looking trails. Someone asked if it was going to be open this year, to which they replied 'yes'.

Idk?
Lol Dude. UCI works basically like the italian mafia in an old timey movie. Why would a company that doesn't care about the sport at all, looses money on everything but the road racing and is only about making money by literally extorting everyone (trade team limitations, not allowing filmakers for teams and a ton of other shit practices) approach anyone?

Also be reasonable guys. Whistler already has races with most of the top dh pros. Do you really need our spot to give money an organization that should die if we want the sport to get better? Fuck that. I'd rather they spread their influence by hosting CWX events all around the globe and creating an alternative DH world cup around that. People might have some quarels with CWX but even penis cancer is better than UCI
 

kickstand

Turbo Monkey
Sep 18, 2009
3,441
392
Fenton, MI
what exactly is your point?

Everytime this comes up on ridemonkey I see the same answers, whistler doesn't need to host a worldcup to make money and doesn't want the headache that comes with the UCI. Same answers I have read up until I got to this post of yours. What is your link supposed to show?
 
Last edited: