Quantcast

Works Components Ajustable 40 Crowns.

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,076
5,989
borcester rhymes
I think it's great and will likely be the next "revolution" in DH geometry.

I've ridden forks with 65mm offset and 34mm offset, as well as 45 and 51. For me, the shorter the better in almost all conditions. Being able to adjust it would give you room to play.
 

HAB

Chelsea from Seattle
Apr 28, 2007
11,580
2,006
Seattle
I think it's great and will likely be the next "revolution" in DH geometry.

I've ridden forks with 65mm offset and 34mm offset, as well as 45 and 51. For me, the shorter the better in almost all conditions. Being able to adjust it would give you room to play.
Da fuq has a 65mm offset?
 

maxyedor

<b>TOOL PRO</b>
Oct 20, 2005
5,496
3,141
In the bathroom, fighting a battle
I think it's great and will likely be the next "revolution" in DH geometry.

I've ridden forks with 65mm offset and 34mm offset, as well as 45 and 51. For me, the shorter the better in almost all conditions. Being able to adjust it would give you room to play.
Does one need room to play, or would a simple single-position, low offset work?
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,076
5,989
borcester rhymes
Does one need room to play, or would a simple single-position, low offset work?
what works for me not work for everybody else. There are plenty of mtbrers that swear by having 51mm offset on their 29ers. Having tried both, 46mm offers more direct feel and less floppiness. Plus I think there will be some compromise between head angle and offset that offers riders the best feel...without knowing everybody's individual setups, I think some level of adjustability makes sense.
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
85,942
24,512
media blackout
what works for me not work for everybody else. There are plenty of mtbrers that swear by having 51mm offset on their 29ers. Having tried both, 46mm offers more direct feel and less floppiness. Plus I think there will be some compromise between head angle and offset that offers riders the best feel...without knowing everybody's individual setups, I think some level of adjustability makes sense.
29'ers are all flappers
 

maxyedor

<b>TOOL PRO</b>
Oct 20, 2005
5,496
3,141
In the bathroom, fighting a battle
what works for me not work for everybody else. There are plenty of mtbrers that swear by having 51mm offset on their 29ers. Having tried both, 46mm offers more direct feel and less floppiness. Plus I think there will be some compromise between head angle and offset that offers riders the best feel...without knowing everybody's individual setups, I think some level of adjustability makes sense.
Then the question is, can most riders tell the difference and make an educated choice? If they can, wouldn't it make sense to manufacture a couple of fixed sizes that will weigh less and stay silent? Reminds me of these god-awful things

 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,076
5,989
borcester rhymes
sorry if I am confused, but that's what I was talking about as well. 51 vs 46 seems to make a difference in my experience for big wheels and trail bikes.

35 and 65 certainly made a difference in little wheels big bike. I think that the next tuning scheme (like head angle was in 2003) will be toying with offset.

@maxydor: no, the average rider probably cannot tell the difference. That doesn't mean that bike nerds like myself and people far more capable shouldn't be toying with it (just like angle adjust headsets). Really good bike riders can ride a trike like I can ride a DH bike, so I'm not sure they'll care until somebody says "Hey try this and see if you go faster".
 

thad

Monkey
Sep 28, 2004
388
21
Aftermarket crowns with different offsets have been a thing for motocross bikes for awhile, 19mm. 20.5mm, or 22mm.
The adjustable offset seems prone to creaking and extra weight. I am surprised no companies offer 40 and boxxer crowns with different offsets.