Quantcast

This is what's wrong with The Industry™

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
85,883
24,466
media blackout

profro

Turbo Monkey
Feb 25, 2002
5,617
314
Walden Ridge
I tell you what I think is wrong with the industry, lift assisted trails that only have 350ft of vert, enduro races that are 100% lift assisted, and e-bikes.

What happened to the fundamental accpect of bikes where you actually need pedal them? Otherwise just get a motorcycle.
 

rockofullr

confused
Jun 11, 2009
7,342
924
East Bay, Cali
I tell you what I think is wrong with the industry, lift assisted trails that only have 350ft of vert, enduro races that are 100% lift assisted, and e-bikes.

What happened to the fundamental accpect of bikes where you actually need pedal them? Otherwise just get a motorcycle.
I pedal my bike a lot. I could use more uplift in my life lol
 

mykel

closer to Periwinkle
Apr 19, 2013
5,102
3,818
sw ontario canada

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
85,883
24,466
media blackout
I tell you what I think is wrong with the industry, lift assisted trails that only have 350ft of vert, enduro races that are 100% lift assisted, and e-bikes.

What happened to the fundamental accpect of bikes where you actually need pedal them? Otherwise just get a motorcycle.
So 351ft of very is cool? Got it.
 

schwaaa31

Turbo Monkey
Jul 30, 2002
1,434
1,022
Clinton Massachusetts
I tell you what I think is wrong with the industry, lift assisted trails that only have 350ft of vert, enduro races that are 100% lift assisted, and e-bikes.

What happened to the fundamental accpect of bikes where you actually need pedal them? Otherwise just get a motorcycle.
Do you also feel that XC skiing is the only respectable form of skiing? I mean, what do they need chairlifts for anyway?
 

profro

Turbo Monkey
Feb 25, 2002
5,617
314
Walden Ridge
Do you also feel that XC skiing is the only respectable form of skiing? I mean, what do they need chairlifts for anyway?
I think you have drawn some conclusions that appear to be pretty defensive on your part.

I live pretty much at the base of Windrock Bike Park. I occasionally ride the shuttles on the weekend and occasionally pedal the 2100ft to the peak. Nothing wrong with either, but that's quite different than being so lazy that you can't pedal 350ft for a 1 -2 minute run down a small hill.
 

slimshady

¡Mira, una ardilla!
Have you guys seen the shit show going on at Vital over the short/long chainstays debate? Some guys seem to think a bike without some magical formula relating the front and rear centers is UNRIDABRU! Personal preference isn't a valid reason, and only 450mm+ chainstays will make you go faster than light.

<Facepalms with a shovel>
 

rockofullr

confused
Jun 11, 2009
7,342
924
East Bay, Cali
Have you guys seen the shit show going on at Vital over the short/long chainstays debate? Some guys seem to think a bike without some magical formula relating the front and rear centers is UNRIDABRU! Personal preference isn't a valid reason, and only 450mm+ chainstays will make you go faster than light.

<Facepalms with a shovel>
Yeah, no one on this forum would be caught arguing about geo numbers, or leverage ratios, or suspension setup.... :monkey:
 

toodles

ridiculously corgi proportioned
Aug 24, 2004
5,502
4,752
Australia
enduro races that are 100% lift assisted.
That would actually be pretty cool if the stages were long enough to justify using shuttles/uplifts. I did the challenger EWS at Whistler and I'm pretty sure I only climbed like 300m for whole event. Doesn't mean it wasn't a hell of a lot of pedalling with the stages and liasons though. Slogging up fireroads when there's an easier option on hand is kind of masochistic really.
 

mtg

Green with Envy
Sep 21, 2009
1,862
1,604
Denver, CO
I tell you what I think is wrong with the industry, lift assisted trails that only have 350ft of vert....
Assuming you're talking about Spider Mountain in Texas, obviously I was just there and rode in a shuttle truck for 1 lap and pedaled the rest because it took 7 minutes to pedal or 4 minutes to shuttle (plus load/unload time). I was questioning why you would ever ride the lift there, until I thought about pedaling a bike up a hill in Texas, in the summer time. I've been in Austin in September before, and it was so humid and hot that just standing around made me want to crawl out of my skin. Pedaling up a hill in July would be an absolute no-go for me. That probably has something to do with the chairlift.
 

xy9ine

Turbo Monkey
Mar 22, 2004
2,940
353
vancouver eastside
i agree with the sentiment - rear centers need to grow to balance the new rangey reaches.
I ventured there to state I liked short chainstays because I come from a dirt jumping background only to be told I was going to die and everything I believe in was wrong.

I find a lot less fundamentalists here.
stubby cs are fine - but pair them w/ a 500mm reach, and you're going to be compromising chassis balance (cornering, noticeably). moral of the story is balance. and that a fixed cs length from xs to xl frame sizes is dumb.
 

rockofullr

confused
Jun 11, 2009
7,342
924
East Bay, Cali
I ventured there to state I liked short chainstays because I come from a dirt jumping background only to be told I was going to die and everything I believe in was wrong.

I find a lot less fundamentalists here.
I think what people are realizing currently is that there isn't so much a magic chain stay length but an ideal ratio of the amount of bike in front of you to amount of bike behind you. See Steve's Vorsprung tech talks regarding FC/RC ratios.

This has long been a complaint for tall riders who experience manufacturers increasing the front end length on XL sizes but not the chainstay length, causing too much rearward weight bias.
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
85,883
24,466
media blackout
Back when we first bought our house, there was a little ski resort that had a tiny bike park (if you could even call it that) about 25 minutes away. Barely over 400 ft of vertical. It was nothing special, but it certainly wasn't crap. But what was good about it is that I could spend the morning doing chores, then go bang out DH laps for a few hours in the afternoon. Why? Because it had a lift. Sadly it's no longer in business. Now the closet DH trails (lift access or otherwise) is a 90 minute drive.
 

jstuhlman

bagpipe wanker
Dec 3, 2009
16,681
13,026
Cackalacka du Nord
Back when we first bought our house, there was a little ski resort that had a tiny bike park (if you could even call it that) about 25 minutes away. Barely over 400 ft of vertical. It was nothing special, but it certainly wasn't crap. But what was good about it is that I could spend the morning doing chores, then go bang out DH laps for a few hours in the afternoon. Why? Because it had a lift. Sadly it's no longer in business. Now the closet DH trails (lift access or otherwise) is a 90 minute drive.
dude-90 minutes is sweet. our closest is 2.5 hours door to door. i regularly (i.e., fuckit fridays when i blow off work, like tomorrow) drive 2 hours to ride non lift assist back country pisgah goodness. prolly 4-5 hours riding, 4 hours driving total. worth it every time.
 

jstuhlman

bagpipe wanker
Dec 3, 2009
16,681
13,026
Cackalacka du Nord
I just had an idea


DON'T ENTER STUPID FUCKING ENDURO RACES THAT ATTRACT THOUSANDS OF ENTITLED CAUCASIAN DIPSHITS WHO JUST GOT THEIR FIRST EASTER COLORED DORK MACHINES.


Worth a shot at least.
but but but...my dork machine is trendy non-pastel-match your tacoma-beige...i can haz enduro (at least until my crabon bars snap and impale me ded)?
 

slimshady

¡Mira, una ardilla!
I think what people are realizing currently is that there isn't so much a magic chain stay length but an ideal ratio of the amount of bike in front of you to amount of bike behind you. See Steve's Vorsprung tech talks regarding FC/RC ratios.

This has long been a complaint for tall riders who experience manufacturers increasing the front end length on XL sizes but not the chainstay length, causing too much rearward weight bias.
That's exactly my point. At 6ft tall/ape index 1, I was quite comfortable with my Orbea Rallón's 465mm reach and 420mm chainstays, but after trying a friend's Mondraker Dune with 480mm reach and 435mm chainstays I couldn't believe how much composed that bike was in terms of stability, ploughability and steamrolling, without feeling like a transatlantic when taking slow/closed-ratio turns. You would just point and shoot, and the bike would do as instructed. That however came to the expense of being harder to manual and harder to get air time with it. The suspension system has a lot to do with a bike's manners of course, and I think you cannot derive a general formula for front/rear center ratios without taking it into account.

I'm still looking for a 480mm reach/590-600mm stack/420-425mm chainstays/64° HA/76-77° SA bike.

I think Guerrilla Gravity approaches what I want with their current crabon Megatrail, but I'm still splitting hairs in terms of my next bike's geometry.
 

toodles

ridiculously corgi proportioned
Aug 24, 2004
5,502
4,752
Australia
I just had an idea.
I bet that hurt.

Read that again, but slowly. Why would I be waiting for an uplift at an enduro race? Its been big DH races where I've spent 5x more time waiting for shuttles than riding. Maybe something retarded like the Megavalanche might involved huge uplift delays but i'm not interested in that shit. Ythink the purist DHers are just hating on enduro because they put all their money into a dual crown sled that is massive overkill for what they're doing and they're frustrated bum-bag wearing fashion rejects seem to be having more fun.