Nope. It was the New Hampshire State police, acting on the orders of Giuliani's staff.
Sorry for providing documentation to back up my claims, I know you all are not used to that sort of thing. :weee:
Giuliani is an asshole liar who tried to exploit 9/11 for political gain, and had people who called him on his lies roughed up and arrested.
Come to think of it, he would be a perfect fit as president. :think:
I still haven't read this, but apparently David Ray Griffin doesn't think much of it.
His review of The Ground Truth is far from favorable. He points out 15 flaws in the book, documented facts, that people should really consider.
The comments on this review are also quite interesting. One...
I didn't see it, but I heard last night's episode on the HAARP wasn't very sciencey and only once mentioned ELF. I hear they didn't really talk about what it is at all, just what people speculate it might be.
Next week is 9/11. I'll make an effort to see that one.
Where did you get that pic of me? THEY must be watching me. I gotta double up on the foil.
Did anyone bother to watch that ridiculous video, where NIST denies that molten steel was present interspersed with tons of evidence that it does? That **** was crazy!
Or at least NIST isn't aware of any evidence of it, and is not aware that anybody ever reported anything of the type. In this video, NIST states that it is unlikely that the fires could have been hot enough to cause molten steel, which is weird, because this video is chock full of reports of...
Wow. Just wow. I don't have much else to say here, so please allow me to summarize.
It seems pretty clear to me that constitution says what it does. It's also pretty clear to me that the government has decided that it is appropriate to try KSM in Manhattan, as that is what is happening...
Ok, then. I guess the conclusion here is that the US Constitution is just a goddamned piece of paper, and the US can just pick and choose what parts to follow according to whim. Sounds good to me. Thanks.
If the US has jurisdiction, as claimed in the constitution, then it must exercise its authority as prescribed in the constitution. Anything else would be unconstitutional. If you don't believe me, then ask Attorney General Eric Holder, as this appears to be his interpretation.
Yes, they do deserve a trial in this country, and in New York, in fact, as that is where the "crime" occurred. This is what is stated in Article III, and in the Sixth Amendment.
You might want to take a minute to actually read the constitution, specifically Article III which seems to have some bits (that I bolded for easy reading) relevant to the matter at hand.
I think they would have a public trial, because it is actually the right thing to do, as EVERYONE deserves the protections of the constitution. Not sure why they decided to do the right thing now... from what I remember reading this was mostly the decision of the attorney general.
I have no...
I'd appreciate some context here, but yeah, looked pretty clean to me.
As you have all suspected, I really only get upset about the ones that involve brutality. This wasn't it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.