I've had good experiences w/ X Fusion stuff & I'm leaning toward the Metric HLR for whatever 170ish travel frame I end up getting. About the only negative things I've read about it are the limited arch clearance w/ a large 27.5 tire (and I'll be running something large...2.5 butcher on a 24 mm...
I normally avoid talas or other dual position systems due to added stiction & weight, but I'm sorta thinking of getting the 130/160 DP pike maybe. haven't seen any definitive comparison on stiction. Is the added weight only 50 g for realz? Found a link for someone who makes progression tokens...
Would like to replace my Norco Truax / Totem with a longer reach CF frame. Coming up empty so far. Capra looks promising but no XL, and the L is too short. Spec enduro expert evo looks OK but no carbon. Scrolled thru the usual brands to refresh my memory after an epic winter of skiing but...
http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-us/bikes/model/reign.x1/14836/66235/#features
she's mostly an XC rider but has been getting into some of the flowy / slightly chunky trails at mammoth etc and has connections that mean Giant = super cheap. and there are trails around here that she would pedal...
Dunno if this was posted here already, but ( http://www.pinkbike.com/news/X-Fusion-Revel-hlr-First-Look.html ) the new Revel x-fusion fork is using keyed upper slider section to prevent rotation and therefore greatly increase overall fork torsional rigidity.
I still think USD forks have...
When I built up my Norco Truax last year with my existing build kit (steel SLX cranks, 22/36 rings, SLX 2X front derailleur) with a Heim roller guide and a bashring, occasionally I'd get a drop to the granny gear on rough terrain...or some chain issues when momentarily back-pedaling. So this...
doesn't get ridden much, but I have a size Lg uzzi vpx...
thanks to the slackerizing rear dropouts, and the Avy shock internals (Push MX shock -- dramatic improvement), the bike rides pretty well but one thing I can't change is the effective top tube / reach....it's too short for my 6'...
Scandium alloy gets used in some interesting bike applications -- e.g. Siren XC frames use it as a pivotless suspension flexible chainstay -- but overall it's not been adopted much.
A handlebar (cyclic fatigue resistance) seems like a great application for Scandium but other than the Azonic...
A while back I posted that it seemed that magazine reviewers were encouraged by Pivot to treat this DH bike as an AM bike of sorts i.e. demo bikes were set up w/ a dropper seatpost, uphill pedalling was encouraged.
The more frames I try these days, the more I find I prefer the Reach to be...
One of my bikes is an uzzi vpx/1.5 Totem DH with 2x9 drivetrain and 135 mm rear wheel. The slackerized dropouts and push MX coil have dialed the bike in pretty damn well, but I've reluctantly decided the ETT (23") and reach are too short for me.
Wanting to use my existing build (1.5 ST...
$699 w/ shock.
for the riders out there looking to ride DH on a budget, this frame seems like a good deal. the design similarities to a morewood makalu are obvious. 1.5 HT means you could run a HA of 64.5, and lower the BB to 14 inches or so. takes a standard 9.5 X 3.0 shock, and the vivid...
the improved cyclic fatigue resistance of scandium (compared to other alu alloys) means that can even be used as flexible frame member in softail frames that typically are built with Ti.
it would seem to be a great material for DH bars, but I've only seen one scandium bar (azonic b52...i...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.