Pinkbike does have its perks: http://www.pinkbike.com/modules/news/?op=articleview&id=2182
...and heyah = here.
...and heyah = here.
true, but then you could say the same about the 1.5 standard.ViolentVolante said:most likely, marketing
It says MadCatz team spec, and they run boxxers rite? Just a guess, but like you said, that equates into marketing. Either way, sweet spec. (Unless you dont like boxxers )Jm_ said:Ok...it's time to stir up some sheiße;
For two years now they have not ran the Manitou Breakout+ as the fork on their DH bike, why?
Certain people, such as Ska Todd and others (DW?) told us that they felt it was as stiff as a boxxer, and fed us all the stuff about it being lighter and more flickable, blah blah blah, so;
Why do we not see that fork on the DH bikes?
well, I just find it suprising given how much the IH guys (and anyone affilliated) rammed down our throats how they thought it was just as stiff as a boxxer, and had more advantages...The Kadvang said:It says MadCatz team spec, and they run boxxers rite? Just a guess, but like you said, that equates into marketing. Either way, sweet spec. (Unless you dont like boxxers )
Two reasons: The bikes are designed around longer travel forks (8") and the team is Rockshox sponsored (they'll run 8" boxxers when they arrive)...Jm_ said:Why do we not see that fork on the DH bikes?
Yeah. I definitly see your point. Maybe the bike is designed around a fork with a longer axel-crown? I don't know about breakout + vs. 8 inch boxxer, but I would assume the boxxer is a bit more.Jm_ said:well, I just find it suprising given how much the IH guys (and anyone affilliated) rammed down our throats how they thought it was just as stiff as a boxxer, and had more advantages...
So logically....
Hey, Ohio's back!ohio said:Two reasons: The bikes are designed around longer travel forks (8") and the team is Rockshox sponsored (they'll run 8" boxxers when they arrive)...
Besides, they're running the breakout plus on their flagship 7" bike (and have for two years running)... I'd say the vote of confidence is there. So I'm not really sure what sheiss you hope to stir up. Better luck next time.
Uh, they were designed around 7" forks for 2003 and 2004, so your answer doesn't quite add up, especially for 2004. I guess manitou and rockshox never figured out till 2005 what marzocchi had in 2001, that 8" was going to be a standard for DH forksohio said:Two reasons: The bikes are designed around longer travel forks (8") and the team is Rockshox sponsored (they'll run 8" boxxers when they arrive)...
Sorta...MikeD said:Hey, Ohio's back!
Are we talking about the same 2005 model 8" DH frame? Because I thought we were. I'm also pretty sure that IH knew at the time they specced final geometry (long before that, in fact) that the DH bikes would be running 8" travel forks.Jm_ said:Uh, they were designed around 7" forks for 2003 and 2004
Actually, Im just talking about the lack of the 7" single crown that we heard was "all that" for DH racing, we heard it in 2003, but when it was reased in 2004 it did't make it to the DH bike...why?ohio said:Are we talking about the same 2005 model 8" DH frame? Because I thought we were. I'm also pretty sure that IH knew at the time they specced final geometry (long before that, in fact) that the DH bikes would be running 8" travel forks.
It would be one thing if they WEREN'T running the Breakout+ anywhere in the product line. But they are.
Although some of us weight-weenie Internet freaks thought that a 7" SC would be an awesome DH fork, was the Breakout+ ever actually marketed as a DH fork? I thought the Shermans were all marketed as freeride forks (whatever that means) and are thus appropriately spec'd on the freeride bikes.Jm_ said:Actually, Im just talking about the lack of the 7" single crown that we heard was "all that" for DH racing, we heard it in 2003, but when it was reased in 2004 it did't make it to the DH bike...why?
They weren't running 8" forks in 2004, given how much we heard about 7" single crown 1.5 forks, about them being stiffer than boxxers, lighter, etc, you would have thought it would be a no-brainer to see them on the 2004 bikes right?
MikeD said:Although some of us weight-weenie Internet freaks thought that a 7" SC would be an awesome DH fork, was the Breakout+ ever actually marketed as a DH fork? I thought the Shermans were all marketed as freeride forks (whatever that means) and are thus appropriately spec'd on the freeride bikes.
MD
But again, *outside of us Internet freaks*, who speak to DW (who's not a Manitou rep or marketing agent) directly, was it ever presented by Manitou as a DH fork?Jm_ said:oohh oohh oohh!! I can answer this one;
DW has specifically stated that the firefly and flick are not meant to take the same abuse as the breakout plus, in fact he may have specifically stated that it was a DH fork, I have an idea about the thread so I may be able to find it!
So that quote definitely is building up the 1.5, by logic you could say that the breakout+ is a "hucker fork".dw said:Seeing as this (the Flick/Firefly 150mm) is intended as a long travel enduro bike fork, the 1.125 steerer makes sense. It is intended more for 26-28 lb 6 inch travel XC/ trail bikes. It is not a hucker fork.
The bottom line is that this fork was not intended to, and will most likely not take the same abuse as the 1.5 version (breakout+), and furthermore, if they wanted to build a 1.125 version that did take the same abuse as the 1.5 fork, it would end up being much heavier.
But im sure you knew that already and were just trying to start sh!t.
dw
You're taking comments passed by one or two industry guys in the relative privacy of conversation (yeah, it's the Internet, but they're speaking to a certain audience in here) and extending them to the mass-marketing of the fork.Jm_ said:well, ska todd was telling us how great of a race fork it was as well,
I think it would more come down to the fact that manitou probably wouldn't warrenty the breakout+ on a DH race bike so they couldn't spec them even if they wanted too.Jm_ said:stuff about the break out+
Maybe because if someone sees a sc on a dh bike they have second thoughts about it (it just doesn't look as strong etc.)Jm_ said:Ok...it's time to stir up some sheiße;
For two years now they have not ran the Manitou Breakout+ as the fork on their DH bike, why?
Certain people, such as Ska Todd and others (DW?) told us that they felt it was as stiff as a boxxer, and fed us all the stuff about it being lighter and more flickable, blah blah blah, so;
Why do we not see that fork on the DH bikes?
davod said:Maybe because if someone sees a sc on a dh bike they have second thoughts about it (it just doesn't look as strong etc.)
Also, which other manufacturer has a sherman on their dh bike? I don't know of any, so there is probably is a reason why Ironhorse don't either.
Lastly, you're just whingeing because you want a Sunday but hate the boxxer, right?
sorry, I meant a breakout/breakout+ (single crown). We are talking about the breakout, not the slider aren't we?CTR said:the giant DH comp?
blasphemousdavod said:Are IH bikes made in the same factory as santa cruz ones? because they definately look similar.
Thank You Mark!ohio said:Two reasons: The bikes are designed around longer travel forks (8") and the team is Rockshox sponsored (they'll run 8" boxxers when they arrive)...
Besides, they're running the breakout plus on their flagship 7" bike (and have for two years running)... I'd say the vote of confidence is there. So I'm not really sure what sheiss you hope to stir up. Better luck next time.