heikkihall said:Woah wait a second? St Anne a NORBA? Thats SICK!!!! I cant wait! That schedule is wierd as hell but I cant wait for next season allready.
Dylan said:u can always race pro & race the world cup! Quebec is a hell of a cool town too!
I thought I saw that WV had BOTH DS and MTNx. Isn't that right?Dylan said:Mammoth will host the US National Championships again in '05. However Durango won't be on the schedule.
what bums me out is that West Virginia will have the one & only Dual Slalom race (don't get me wrong, i love racing slalom) but WV had the BEST MntX course last year, where every other place sucked. hopefully the rest of 'em step it up this year.
What? I thought it was "permanent".JJ_PA said:I went down in Oct and it was already leveled.
And we feel the same towards them. :mumble:bizutch said:I'll find out what happened to Sugar. NORBA still has their head in their ass. I'm sure Florida & Georgia appreciate the big "go kiss yourself" from NORBA.
Yea I thought so to, but the guy at snowshoe said it's no big deal to build another one. He said they have the equipment and the crew to do it. I just hope they build it in the spring so I can ride it through the summer.What? I thought it was "permanent".
They(NORBA) will never know if they don't try.profro said:We've had this dicussion before. Its my opinion that having a national at Sugar would only please the "never been before Southern dher". It would piss off everyone else, myself included. There is NO way Sugar is in any shape to host a National. If all those boys from Florida and Georgia want to race, then show up to more of the other local races. Lift lines at a national suck. It eats into practice time. So do eternal lift runs.
Its not about the course being built. I have NO doubt Sugar could throw down a national caliber course. Its the lift plain and simple. Banner Elk has the facilities to host the National no problem, but the lift problem is insane. I don't care if the ran both lifts to the top, it would still take FOREVER and that would majorly eat into practice time.Peete said:They(NORBA) will never know if they don't try.
As far as getting Sugar in shape, don't some of the national courses get built the week or 2 before the event?
Many riders from GA raced the Maxxis series. Many more didn't. I've seen Floridians come up for races but that's a big time and money expense to do more than a couple times a year. A national is a big thing, a regional isn't as big a thing.
South Florida racers doing the Maxxis series would be like Georgia riders going up to VA and W. VA to race their series. Ain't gonna happen. A national would be a different story. We plan on doing a family trip to Snowshoe next year, finances permitting.
But it's ok to go to Canada Lame!!! Dude soooooooooooo many teams will not be goin to NORBA events in 2005!!!bizutch said:Jeff Frost's reply as to why Sugar was excluded:
Butch:
Many factors have made the scheduling of Sugar Mountain in 2005 very
challenging.
Driving most of the decision is a fear that we are stretching the Series
too far. Athletes, teams and venues are all feeling the financial crunch
of traveling to additional events. One of our priorities is to protect
the financial interests of our venues. Meaning, if by expanding the
Series less riders and teams attend then each venue may suffer.
What we are considering is that in 2006, we will include Sugar Mountain
(pending final site visit) and rotate out one of our 2005 venues. Our
ultimate goal is to have the Series consist of six (6) events - one (1)
early season (Texas, Arizona, or Florida) 2 west, 2 east, one Colorado.
We need the time in 2005 to negotiate with the existing Series venues a
rotation schedule for future years.
I appreciate your enthusiasm, and please understand the venue selection
process is getting more difficult when we try to balance all the needs
of the venues, and USA Cycling members.
Thanks for your time.
JF
NORBA National Mountain Bike Series
Park City Cycling Festival
US Mountain Bike National Championships
Jeep King of the Mountain
www.norbanationals.com
www.parkcitycyclingfest.com
www.jeepsports.com
www.bluewolfevents.com
Canada is hardly having a "National" next year. They are doing 1 marathon race at a venue that is allready going to be set up for a much larger race. The marathon is simply going to be a sideshow. No teams are going to being there for the Marathon event alone. Anyone that is going to be there will be there for the world cup. In reality this is how I think the races should be run anyway. Get 2 events done all in one shot. Have all the top pros there for their races and then run amature races on the side. It would get more people there to ride and to spectate. From what I hear Mt Snow used to do this back in the day and the result was awesome. World Cup level racing is incredible. If you think the pros are fast at Nationals, its a whole notch above when they show up to the World Cup Races.dhtahoe said:But it's ok to go to Canada Lame!!! Dude soooooooooooo many teams will not be goin to NORBA events in 2005!!!
They probably aren't going to Georgia for the same reason they aren't going back to Minnesota.bizutch said:I'll find out what happened to Sugar. NORBA still has their head in their ass. I'm sure Florida & Georgia appreciate the big "go kiss yourself" from NORBA.
OneBrickShy said:Woh, wait a tic, are you telling me that there is no Pro-payout at any of the Norba Nationals??? I just recently switched from MX to Downhill, and intending on racing the expert class at the Norba Nationals. If there is no pay out though, there is not way i can afford it.
We do all of the regional races. Compared to a nat they are wham-bam- thank you ma'am. Done in one or 2 days. A nat is more like the circus coming to town.profro said:And for all you Floridians/Goergians: If you want to go to a race and get in a lot of riding time, win some prizes, and get the most for your money.... go to a regional race. The only thing nationals have going for them are the pits and the number of pros. But do you go to be a spectator or a competitor?
Actually In a way some people could consider it motivation. I know of a few ski racers on the pro circuit who used to spend all their money getting to the races and if they didnt make the podium they actually couldnt afford their rent for the monh or eat until the next race. If thats not motivation go go fast then I dont know what is. But ski racing is wierd. The top "amatures" actually make ALOT more than the best pros and are actually faster racers.buildyourown said:Even if you were racing pro and there was a payout I wouldn't count on it to cover expenses.
That's like trying to bankroll a vacation to vegas on your winnings.
the MSA course is absolutely amazing and more technical than you can possibly imagine, when i started rainging again this year during our race runs, i kid you not most of us started crying, its a horror movie trying to clean a run there when its wet, but man do you learn to rideheikkihall said:I was kinda planning on doing that allready. Ive been up as a spectator the past 2 years and it looks like such a fin course. And yea Quebec is an awesome city!
Well said. I does suck to race for all this time, survive cancer, fight to get back into shape to do what I love, and the circus has left town. I feel like Lance if they cancelled the Tour De France.stiksandstones said:yeah, and they STILL HAVE NO PRIZE MONEY FOR THE PROS!!!!!
THIS WILL BE THE 3rd YEAR IN A ROW
Was talking to a motocross legend yesterday and he said something that was frightening...
"These norba guys got the racket going man, lets say tommorrow they get a sponsor for the series for a million bucks (not likely), they dont even have to pay the pros any prize money, because these dumb@sses have been racing for 2 years without getting paid, why pay them now?"
I could so see that happening, just paying themselves more and ripping off the pros.
Yeah yeah yeah, I know no one here cares about the pros, but I do.