Thanks for answering! Did you put the adapters too??
Them saying that is actually better and funnier than the original report.Just saw this on Distilled (I assume regarding their rather negative comments on Evil/Steve):
Our Schladming race report is back up for you to enjoy, and we apologize for the delay. Just to clear things up a little, we removed a few sentences to keep the peace with some people in the industry who were very upset at what we printed. We did not remove it because it was untrue, as we rigorously check our facts here at Distilled, but the comment was affecting someones business and thats not what Distilled is about. Taking down something that you know to be true doesnt really sit well with me but we try to keep a positive vibe to the mag, and were not into embarrassing anyone. However, in this and in every former and subsequent Distilled article, you the reader can be assured that we report the facts and that you can believe everything you read here; just the facts, no gossip, speculation or rumor-mongering. Ok, thats as about as deep and meaningful as I hope to get in the foreseeable future; Im writing about grown men on pushbikes for goodness sake, its not exactly Watergate. Enjoy Distilled Digital!
http://distilledmag.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/journalistic-integrity/
I think they just made it worse... good job distilled..Just saw this on Distilled (I assume regarding their rather negative comments on Evil/Steve):
Our Schladming race report is back up for you to enjoy, and we apologize for the delay. Just to clear things up a little, we removed a few sentences to keep the peace with some people in the industry who were very upset at what we printed. We did not remove it because it was untrue, as we rigorously check our facts here at Distilled, but the comment was affecting someone’s business and that’s not what Distilled is about. Taking down something that you know to be true doesn’t really sit well with me but we try to keep a positive vibe to the mag, and we’re not into embarrassing anyone. However, in this and in every former and subsequent Distilled article, you the reader can be assured that we report the facts and that you can believe everything you read here; just the facts, no gossip, speculation or rumor-mongering. Ok, that’s as about as deep and meaningful as I hope to get in the foreseeable future; I’m writing about grown men on pushbikes for goodness’ sake, it’s not exactly Watergate. Enjoy Distilled Digital!
http://distilledmag.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/journalistic-integrity/
No kidding. Kinda goes against my "cheap shot" theory...I think they just made it worse... good job distilled..
of course! the bucking phenomenon is doubled too!Someone was saying it's (the bucking) down to the leverage rate doubling through the travel ?
I'll try to answer your questions as best as I can from the way it's been explained to me. A medium Revolt is pretty darn close to the same size as a medium Sunday. A large Revolt is smaller than a large Sunday and an XL Revolt is a little bigger than a large Sunday. Evil tried to reduce the difference between sizes and run 4 sizes (S,M,L, and XL) to better match each rider to the right size. I think you'd probably fit better on a large than a medium but I'd shoot an email to info@evil-bikes.com.Hi everybody,
I come from France and I got few questions about that Evil.
- I'm just 6.0 and I used to ride a medium Iron Horse Sunday. What's size should I choose. I 've heard that the TT seems to be "normal" on the medium and "short" on the large.
- is it possible to change geo and leverage ratio (progressivity) in the same time by changing the way of flipchips: for example front and rear flipchip in the same position (low or high) ? If it's possible, what are the effects on the suspension : LSC, mid stroke, progressivity,geo. etc...hope I'm clear.
- and for all the riders who know well the Sunday and ride the revolt now : could you tell me please if this bike is much "plush" and if it's stay more stable on brakes (in break bumps or in roots for exemple). differences in fact
Thank you
The leverage curve does not double through the travel, that would be verySomeone was saying it's (the bucking) down to the leverage rate doubling through the travel ?
you should check again. i said that it does buck me, but only if the rebound isnt setup properly.....which it wasnt when i bought the bike back in May.Funny how i still haven't heard on any forum or in person anyone who ACTUALY owns a Revolt say "it bucked me".
I did actually remember your post but it really dosnt count as you admit it was a setup problem...any bike will buck with the wrong settings...... im just saying if it was a real problem there would be people complaining an backing up these storys.you should check again. i said that it does buck me, but only if the rebound isnt setup properly.....which it wasnt when i bought the bike back in May.
it took some dialing in and a few clicks on the rebound knob makes a big difference
which one are you running slack? the front or the rear?The geometry is supposed to be adjustable without effecting the way the suspenion reacts. I run one flip chip slack, one steep and the HT slack. I tried going all slack but I was smacking pedals too often.
Front. It seemed the easiest to change.which one are you running slack? the front or the rear?
you know you're supposed to change both of them together, right? If you are going to give people set-up advice that is completely counter (lazy?) to what was designed at least say so.Front. It seemed the easiest to change.
That's exactly what I want to Know : the effect of flipping just one on the leverage ratio.you know you're supposed to change both of them together, right? If you are going to give people set-up advice that is completely counter (lazy?) to what was designed at least say so.
by flipping both chips the leverage ratio stays the same. flipping one and not the other you alter the geometry and the suspension; the exact scenario the revolt was designed to avoid.
That's exactly what I want to Know : the effect of flipping just one on the leverage ratio.
do you have a white or anno bike? i tried this method on my anno frame and its in there good.I was able to easily get my rear flip chip out using a round punch and ball peen hammer and some tender persuasion.
same with the swingarm. that bitch aint coming off
I think i misunderstood the original post. read it too quickly and thought he was implying that flipping just one chip was the way the adjustment was designed to work. never tried it but i doubt it makes much difference w/ the suspension, at least not in a noticeable way (DW would have to answer that one). so i can't see any reason to flip just one unless you're looking for a bb height somewhere in between the 2 standard settings.Lee: Kevin helped me build my bike and I got the impression from him that you could flip just one end (either end) and it would be just fine. I don't think it's enough of a change to change the leverage curve a noticable amount but it will change the bottom bracket height just a bit.
I was able to easily get my rear flip chip out using a round punch and ball peen hammer and some tender persuasion.
Hi everybody,
I come from France and I got few questions about that Evil.
- I'm just 6.0 and I used to ride a medium Iron Horse Sunday. What's size should I choose. I 've heard that the TT seems to be "normal" on the medium and "short" on the large.
I'm 5' 10" and ride a medium. I think it will depend on your preference. The medium fits me pretty good even though the cockpit feels shorter than my Sunday's. I would suggest finding both a medium and a large to compare.
- is it possible to change geo and leverage ratio (progressivity) in the same time by changing the way of flipchips: for example front and rear flipchip in the same position (low or high) ? If it's possible, what are the effects on the suspension : LSC, mid stroke, progressivity,geo. etc...hope I'm clear.
The geometry is supposed to be adjustable without effecting the way the suspenion reacts. I run one flip chip slack, one steep and the HT slack. I tried going all slack but I was smacking pedals too often.
- and for all the riders who know well the Sunday and ride the revolt now : could you tell me please if this bike is much "plush" and if it's stay more stable on brakes (in break bumps or in roots for exemple). differences in fact
I find the Revolt is better in the rough stuff than my Sunday when you get off the brakes and just let it go. On the brakes in the rough I find the Revolts back end doesn't dance as much as my Sunday did.
I just rode two more days in Whistler last weekend; no mysterious bucking issues for me. This bike likes to get ragged, I think it rides better on the edge of control than when you're being cautious. If you ride with good form and setup the suspension properly this bike is mint.
Most of my riding friends have commented on how much faster I have been this year on the Revolt. Not sure if its true or not as I don't race.
Thank you
Actually I didn't know that. No where have I ever read that or been told that. The geo chart states a min and a max. I assumed that I could flip one to be in the middle for HA and BB height.you know you're supposed to change both of them together, right? If you are going to give people set-up advice that is completely counter (lazy?) to what was designed at least say so.
by flipping both chips the leverage ratio stays the same. flipping one and not the other you alter the geometry and the suspension; the exact scenario the revolt was designed to avoid.
As in just one side? I do dumb sh!t; but not that dumb. I flipped both front chips.You must have missed Lee's post after I said the same thing. He thought you wanted to flip just one chip out offiur instead of one of the two pairs.
you're supposed to flip the upper and lower chips together to keep the leverage ratio the same. flip one (as in one pair, left and right obviously) and you're going to end up with something different (not necessarily better or worse), at least on paper. on some bikes a few mm difference in shock placement isn't a big deal, on others it can be the difference between an inch or more of travel.As in just one side? I do dumb sh!t; but not that dumb. I flipped both front chips.
So whats the answer... Am I messing with the leverage ratio or not?
At the demo day where I had a chance to ride Kevin Walsh's Revolt he was telling me that his bike was setup like this, only one side flipped. Dunno if I misunderstood him though....you're supposed to flip the upper and lower chips together to keep the leverage ratio the same. flip one (as in one pair, left and right obviously) and you're going to end up with something different (not necessarily better or worse), at least on paper. on some bikes a few mm difference in shock placement isn't a big deal, on others it can be the difference between an inch or more of travel.
paging DW . . .
the frame and swingarm change position relative to each other when the bb height is raised/lowered, the idea behind having to sets of flip-chips is so that the actual shock mounts on each end remain the same. granted, this is a lot easier to visualize in person. but from the sounds of it you can flip just the upper one w/out doing anything detrimental to the suspension.Why use two sets of chips if you're not supposed to be able flip only one set? Using one set would make make it dummy proof.