a vote for trump is a vote for jim crow.
2016 speculation thread
- Thread starter Pesqueeb
- Start date
-
Two more days to enter the Secret Santa!
Entries must be in by midnight on November 29th. We're kicking off the 2024 Secret Santa! Exchange gifts with other monkeys - from beer and snacks, to bike gear, to custom machined holiday decorations and tools by our more talented members, there's something for everyone.
McCain's moral majority included a meth maker. We know Trump has mafia ties in his past, so can he 1 up that?
http://gawker.com/fundraiser-for-senator-john-mccain-arrested-in-arizona-1773405899
http://gawker.com/fundraiser-for-senator-john-mccain-arrested-in-arizona-1773405899
in other news, trump university fraud lawsuit will be proceeding to trial
This is what I'm afraid will happen with a great number of voters. Hillary is not the most trust worthy candidate, however she is not an insane, unstable compulsive liar. Her lies are much better thought out, but I digress. Like her or not, she is capable of doing the job. Trump on the other hand is not only incompetent but dangerous.
Voting for Hillary at the worst would mean an economy that still favors the banks and corporations. Voting for Trump could very easily end up with us on track for another global war as he is Hell bent on alienating other countries.
Given the choice, I'll take the mental stability of Old Pant Suit over the insane, compulsive lying, orange clown, on a trust fund.
the picture i saw of trump last night on CNN he looked like a spray tanned raccoon
here's my tl;dr version on this subject:
My $0.02 - sanders is the best chance for someone to enact meaningful change to help the majority of the country. My Top pick. Clinton, i don't think is a bad candidate by any means, but represents the establishment / business as usual politics. The GOP doesn't have a serious contender in their field, and Drumpf is outright dangerous, and lacks many, if not all qualities but one (narcissism) required to be President.
apparently, then, @jonKranked you have as much work to do on this topic as @stoney does on the "value" and "necessity" of q7s and $1000 purses
Pretty sure Jim Crow is to the left of Drumpf.
Neither of those words factor into either of those conversations. As for the Audi, it's a battle that I will eventually lose, so why not get one at a 40% discount to market?
I've been trying for years to get the wife to look into getting mexican citizenship. Her dad qualifies as a citizen, so I'd think it can't be that hard. A drumpf presidency might be enough to finally get her to look into it for me.
Good luck getting over the wall.
hoping to get a job building the wall?
you might need to live in your tunnel
like squeeb...i don't do well in the sun.
cruz/fiorina? 
SPF 10100
I think I'll make my exodus to BC.......too many Mexicans in Mexico
(I keed I keed)
saw an article earlier that points out something important.
Bernie can't win the nomination outright through delegate count.
but neither can hillary. she would have to win an unrealistic amount of the remaning delegates: 71%.
trying to find the link.
Bernie can't win the nomination outright through delegate count.
but neither can hillary. she would have to win an unrealistic amount of the remaning delegates: 71%.
trying to find the link.
here we go:
sorry, not enough coffee yet.
https://johnlaurits.com/2016/04/28/this-is-what-will-happen-at-the-democratic-convention/
The lack of logic anywhere is this election makes me a sad Panda. My paranoid half makes me think puppet-masters are pulling the strings of an ignorant electorate, my pessimist side thinks it's just idiots from top to bottom.
just as useless as counting them, considering they can change their votes at any time.
that is a lot of vince fosters to kill...
wait for clinton/sanders.....if you are into man on man....
This. It seems like there is a whole cottage industry of Bernie sunshine pumping that has sprung up. They all like to exclude the super delegates for her delegate totals yet include them for her target. It's totally disingenuous. Either you include them or you don't and either way this is all but wrapped up.
A friend of mine from college is a big Bernie supporter. He has recently turned to what are some pretty outrageous claims of Hilary masterminding massive voter fraud (>20%). I pointed out on Facebook that a lot of the right also has claimed massive voter fraud each time Obama won. Claming fraud when your candidate loses is not part of a healthy political discussion, and we would be all better off discussing the pros of Bernies agenda instead of spreading conspiracy theories. Ripped some pretty big logical holes in his argument
I was expecting to get flamed pretty hard from him and his friends. I was happy to see only a few defensive comments on how they were just defending the sanctity of democracy and not butt hurt about Bernies losses.
From my jaundiced "view from the outside world" the BS (he's a poly so I'm happy to use the initials like that) followers seem to be the most rational & pragmatic of the fanclubs when it comes to politically alien concepts like "logic" so I'm not surprised.
Next couple states for Bernie might be interesting. I believe that most of teh BS closed primary states are done, so he might really tighten things up between now and convention. Going to make it pretty hard on Hillary if they go into the convention pretty much tied.
From this data one could conclude that the dumbest people from each party will select our next president. Fuck Yeah!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/10/07/trump-supporters-have-the-worst-grammar-study-finds/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/10/07/trump-supporters-have-the-worst-grammar-study-finds/
TIL George Pataki was running for president.From this data one could conclude that the dumbest people from each party will select our next president. Fuck Yeah!!!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/10/07/trump-supporters-have-the-worst-grammar-study-finds/
there are a couple states with open investigations. states that were close which could potentially change (or not change) the outcome.
especially when you consider that per polls, sanders more consistently beats trump (looking more and more like the GOP nominee) and by larger margins. superdelegates and the DEM party in general are gonna have to decide if they really wanna risk a GOP/trump presidency by nominating clinton.
Supposedly there is a video clip of Trump talking about how he didn't think he could beat Bernie.
I remember that.