EVERYONE shit all over bloomberg, even bloomberg.Warren shit all over Bloomberg
EVERYONE shit all over bloomberg, even bloomberg.Warren shit all over Bloomberg
Sorry, my bad! I can almost guarantee it will happen againfixed that for ya.
sadly i don't disagree.Sorry, my bad! I can almost guarantee it will happen again
Bloomberg never should have switched parties, he's a capitalist through & through, with his past comments about the less fortunate/minorities walked right into the lions den.EVERYONE shit all over bloomberg, even bloomberg.
Bloomberg never should have switched parties, he's a capitalist through & through, with his past comments about the less fortunate/minorities walked right into the lions den.
have you been cryogenically frozen for decades?Everyone bickered last night and showed a really bad side of themselves. These debates should not just be about not who sucks the least.
What Bernie needs to produce is a way to pay for everything, have a complete breakdown of where every tax dollar will go, & how much it will go up.sadly i don't disagree.
Funny his commercials talk about making the economy better. Trumps approval ratings are hard for anyone to run against looking at where were at today according to the gallop poll. Bernie & Warren are running on a completely different platform.
Yep, its been that way since the very first debate.have you been cryogenically frozen for decades?
no they're not.Trumps approval ratings are hard for anyone to run against looking at where were at today according to the gallop poll.
Nope. Tired of seeing / hearing it.have you been cryogenically frozen for decades?
Bernie should show the math. Costs $X but money comes from XX savings. Agreed.What Bernie needs to produce is a way to pay for everything, have a complete breakdown on what per
Funny his commercials talk about making the economy better. Trumps approval ratings are hard for anyone to run against looking at where were at today according to the gallop poll. Bernie & Warren are running on a completely different platform.
i am too, but it's disingenuous to act like it's anything new.Nope. Tired of seeing / hearing it.
Im not being disingenuous, just stating a thought. Staters gonna state.i am too, but it's disingenuous to act like it's anything new.
agreed.What Bernie needs to produce is a way to pay for everything, have a complete breakdown of where every tax dollar will go, & how much it will go up.
This is how *that* will go:agreed.
also worth noting, Yale just released a study, published in Lancet.... Medicare for All would save nearly half a trillion dollars annually and could prevent nearly 70,000 deaths annually.
Medicare for All Would Save $450 Billion Annually, New Study Shows
"Our study is actually conservative, because it doesn't factor in the lives saved among underinsured Americans," study author Alison Galvani from the the Yale School of Public Health told Newsweek.www.newsweek.com
Its a double edge sward. You cut corporate taxes to allow companies to produce new jobs. You raise corporate taxes, mass layoffs may happen leaving people without work. Plus you run the risk of corporations leaving the country to further avoid those taxes and them hiring there. But yes, a balanced budget would be a nice thing. I don't think we've been there since Clinton.Nope. Tired of seeing / hearing it.
Bernie should show the math. Costs $X but money comes from XX savings. Agreed.
Also, I could appear to be quite wealthy if I spent everything on flash instead of paying bills. Our economy is not strong while we operate at such a deficit.
Break up the corporations.Its a double edge sward. You cut corporate taxes to allow companies to produce new jobs. You raise corporate taxes, mass layoffs may happen leaving people without work. Plus you run the risk of corporations leaving the country to further avoid those taxes and them hiring there. But yes, a balanced budget would be a nice thing. I don't think we've been there since Clinton.
If they can figure out a way to keep healthcare costs the same as where we're at now, I'd be in!agreed.
also worth noting, Yale just released a study, published in Lancet.... Medicare for All would save nearly half a trillion dollars annually and could prevent nearly 70,000 deaths annually.
Medicare for All Would Save $450 Billion Annually, New Study Shows
"Our study is actually conservative, because it doesn't factor in the lives saved among underinsured Americans," study author Alison Galvani from the the Yale School of Public Health told Newsweek.www.newsweek.com
that's been tried and guess what? no new jobs were createdIts a double edge sward. You cut corporate taxes to allow companies to produce new jobs.
absolute nonsense.You raise corporate taxes, mass layoffs may happen leaving people without work.
the ones who can benefit from it have *already* left.Plus you run the risk of corporations leaving the country to further avoid those taxes and them hiring there.
It would be wrong to allow the government to control all business.Break up the corporations.
I'm taking if government took control.that's been tried and guess what? no new jobs were created
absolute nonsense.
the ones who can benefit from it have *already* left.
breaking them up is not the same as the government controlling them.It would be wrong to allow the government to control all business.
<votes for Trump and every other Republican candidate in the election>If they can figure out a way to keep healthcare costs the same as where we're at now, I'd be in!
STFU - nobody is proposing this.I'm taking if government took control.
Didn't say government control, would limit size and lifespan.It would be wrong to allow the government to control all business.
Sherman Anti-trust Act.Didn't say government control, would limit size and lifespan.
Re lifespan this is not a good metric for how nasty they are. From my thread:Didn't say government control, would limit size and lifespan.
Baby Bell's.It would be wrong to allow the government to control all business.
Bernie wants more government control.STFU - nobody is proposing this.
Actually false, registered republican since 18 in 1984, did in fact vote for Clinton in 1992, only voted for Bush Jr. once.<votes for Trump and every other Republican candidate in the election>
I agree, no company should have the monopolyDidn't say government control, would limit size and lifespan.
I'm talking about the 2020 election, you boob. Be honest - are you likely to vote for ANYTHING other than Trump and the rest of the Republicans?Actually false, registered republican since 18 in 1984, did in fact vote for Clinton in 1992, only voted for Bush Jr. once.
If you believe that "more government control" means "government taking control" then I can't help you and the delusional world you live in.Bernie wants more government control.
Bernie Sanders' Troubling Agenda
Don't believe those who tell you that Sanders is some sort of centrist.reason.com
I'm talking about the 2020 election, you boob. Be honest - are you likely to vote for ANYTHING other than Trump and the rest of the Republicans?
maybe it would be better than businesses controlling all of the government?It would be wrong to allow the government to control all business.
Is mayor Pete aware of mayor Pete's health care platform?Buttigieg Praises Denmark as Best Place to Live the American Dream
"We're not even in the top ten," former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg said.www.newsweek.com
Not this time around. Dems are swinging way too left for me, plus I like Trump. My mom who is a total liberal and can't stand Trump is scared if Bernie gets the nomination and said she would never vote for him.I'm talking about the 2020 election, you boob. Be honest - are you likely to vote for ANYTHING other than Trump and the rest of the Republicans?