the day we have to start doing scandanavian flicks on a bike is the same day we need to stop riding schoolbusses downhill.Paging Sebastian Loeb or Tommi Makinen...are you out there?
the day we have to start doing scandanavian flicks on a bike is the same day we need to stop riding schoolbusses downhill.Paging Sebastian Loeb or Tommi Makinen...are you out there?
I have no idea what you mean, but I still think you're wrong.the day we have to start doing scandanavian flicks on a bike is the same day we need to stop riding schoolbusses downhill.
Tell that to Rossithe day we have to start doing scandanavian flicks on a bike is the same day we need to stop riding schoolbusses downhill.
i'm pretty much discrediting you for these idiotic remarks.......you just compared turning techniques on skis, on snow (with metal blades to help turn) to cornering bicycles in tight S turns on dirt with wheelsIf reverse fishtail is so much quicker, why aren't alpine ski racers using it... EVER?
A tire that's hooking up is always faster than a drift. Always.
just saying that you generally have to drift because you're moving a huge amount of mass around really small turns. We don't move a lot of mass and we typically do not have ultra tight high speed turns. We also don't have a throttle nor 150ft-lbs of torque.I have no idea what you mean, but I still think you're wrong.
Bingo. The idea is to negotiate the turn when it's difficult to maintain. A good 'pilot' will determine the best course of action for the corner, and in many instances for loose or off camber corners it will be a drift.I won't argue that on occasion a drift is faster than a carved turn on a bike in dirt, but more often than not, a carved turn would be faster if it could be negotiated.
it's like talking about bikes is fun or something.Bingo. The idea is to negotiate the turn when it's difficult to maintain. A good 'pilot' will determine the best course of action for the corner, and in many instances for loose or off camber corners it will be a drift.
Also, I like how this went from a whine and cheese party to a discussion about cornering.
You again, Junior? Sheesh.i'm pretty much discrediting you for these idiotic remarks.......you just compared turning techniques on skis, on snow (with metal blades to help turn) to cornering bicycles in tight S turns on dirt with wheels
you're an idiot...that's completely apples to oranges....i won't waste my time getting into the finer points of what a worthless comparison that was....
I'd love to see O'Reilly on a bike.
So bicycles have a throttle that lets the rider regain a line?Rossi and most moto GP guys 'drift' corners, in a sport where time is the #1 goal.
When you have a book called "Motor Cycle Handling and Chassis Design" on your desk at work, and read it, you'll be able to understand the wild, wacky world of physics in relation to two wheels, whether motorized or not. Untill then, keep comparing the dynamics to "alpine skiing" for the lulz.So bicycles have a throttle that lets the rider regain a line?
Interesting.
I love it when you "correct" me with bad information!
Having a book on your desk doesn't make your analogy apt.When you have a book called "Motor Cycle Handling and Chassis Design" on your desk at work, and read it, you'll be able to understand the wild, wacky world of physics in relation to two wheels, whether motorized or not. Untill then, keep comparing the dynamics to "alpine skiing" for the lulz.
at least they still have skinsuitsSo, the alpine ski racing thing is far closer to being directly analogous than throttle/accelerator powered sports.
It's the book D.W. referred to me many years ago, and is the go to as far as two wheeled things go, bicycles included. The fact that you can’t understand that there’s more relation between a motorcycle and a set of skis, regardless of ‘gravity’, shows exactly who we’re gaining the lulz from. But please, continue your asinine tirade, Mr. “Lawyer”. At least it detracts from your asinine tirade on bike videos.Quack Quack, Oink Oink, Woof Woof
But I bet if the FIS mandated Troy Lee Pajamas, more drooling #()cktards would be into it!at least they still have skinsuits
What? Mr "Lawyer"? I'm not related to April.It's the book D.W. referred to me many years ago, and is the go to as far as two wheeled things go, bicycles included. The fact that you can’t understand that there’s more relation between a motorcycle and a set of skis, regardless of ‘gravity’, shows exactly who we’re gaining the lulz from. But please, continue your asinine tirade, Mr. “Lawyer”.
well, now we know why you're so bitter. if I still had to do technical drawings by hand, i'd probably off myself.and my workdesk is a mechanical drawing/drafting table.
Bitter? Me?well, now we know why you're so bitter. if I still had to do technical drawings by hand, i'd probably off myself.
Actualy, section 2-27 is on drifting entirely.... "Those of you that have followed racing techniques over the years will be aware of a change in riding styles amongst the really fast riders, who now sometimes drift their machines to quite a significant extent". The same could be said when Sam and some of the Oz guys who brought drifting over. Bottom line is you have an opportunity to learn from your obvious mistake, but instead you try to drill your ignorant point home, much to the laughter of everyone else here.The book's use by Wiggly doesn't prove anything about analogies we're discussing here.
I'd like you to lay out how that paragraph shows me wrong.Actualy, section 2-27 is on drifting entirely.... "Those of you that have followed racing techniques over the years will be aware of a change in riding styles amongst the really fast riders, who now sometimes drift their machines to quite a significant extent". The same could be said when Sam and some of the Oz guys who brought drifting over. Bottom line is you have an opportunity to learn from your obvious mistake, but instead you try to drill your ignorant point home, much to the laughter of everyone else here.
Look at you getting all defensive! Could that be because you're all hat, no cattle? Nice SUV you have there, hoss! Bet you can buck a bunch of bales into it, huh?First, why don't you lay out why skiing relates exactly to DH mountain biking, and how drifting is only for show.
i'm not gesturing.Bitter? Me?
Shirley, you Geste.
I'm just trying to sort out why Clay Porter calls his movies MTB DH videos, when clearly they are love poems that cover his lustful longings for certain men.
That's your explanation? Weak.Already talked about alpine turns and microdrift in my reply to miss Collins above.
you talk pretty out of your asshole in every forum topic that you **** inpoop poop... bla bla bla... poop poop... lol
Clay Porter should interview you. It would fit the rest of the dull "conversation" he records on video for his latest "edit."you talk pretty out of your asshole in every forum topic that you **** in
In my head you're like a 60 year old cranky geezer with a bad hip and a hankerin for avoiding your wife, yelling at small kids and the good ol days of fully rigid bikes. It would be awesome if I was right.Clay Porter should interview you. It would fit the rest of the dull "conversation" he records on video for his latest "edit."
Congratulations on being a DH racer! It makes you quite the conversationalist!
Oh sorry. Have I farted in your Insider Church? Tell the priest to rebuke me on behalf of The Downhill Deity, then.
Remind me, davide... who made you read this thread? Emphasis on "made," please.
On the magical intratubes your always right...right ?In my head you're like a 60 year old cranky geezer with a bad hip and a hankerin for avoiding your wife, yelling at small kids and the good ol days of fully rigid bikes. It would be awesome if I was right.