He probably read somewhere that Dupont is the gay neighborhood, when all of us who actually live here know it's Logan Circle (the closer to Whole Foods the better). Either that or he thinks what passes as a DC hipster lives anywhere other than Columbia Heights? Best not to take him too seriously. Let his mother take care of putting him in his place; it's her basement.My wife and I actually live in Dupont Circle. Does that mean that I couldn't wreck you in person or on a mountain?
FAIL!He probably read somewhere that Dupont is the gay neighborhood, when all of us who actually live here know it's Logan Circle (the closer to Whole Foods the better). Either that or he thinks what passes as a DC hipster lives anywhere other than Columbia Heights? Best not to take him too seriously. Let his mother take care of putting him in his place; it's her basement.
Thank you for a very good laughHe probably read somewhere that Dupont is the gay neighborhood, when all of us who actually live here know it's Logan Circle (the closer to Whole Foods the better). Either that or he thinks what passes as a DC hipster lives anywhere other than Columbia Heights? Best not to take him too seriously. Let his mother take care of putting him in his place; it's her basement.
Pslide,
Positivity has its place, as does stoke.
People who use either one to mask bad ideas... tools!
I'm sure 3 Minute Gaps has some bizarre type of positive stoke that just doesn't click for me.
On the other hand, every one of Alex Rankin's vids has taught me sheet-tons about how to ride a bike, just from watching the sport's best doing their thing.
Contrast to Clay Porter videos, where I get nothing from watching them except agitation. Where's the racing? Where's the riding? How does someone's eyebrow show me riding skill? How does a close-up of roost show me riding skill? After watching 3 Minute Gaps I feel dumber and more negative and devoid of stoke.
Pretty hard to be positive about that.
Besides, my comedy heroes are Lenny Bruce, Don Rickles, George Carlin and Bill Hicks. I'm sure lots of people on RM find those guys arrogant, bitter or overnegative. I'm also sure that I don't care!
most excellent reply!
and I'm not joking here.
pretty sure your race coaches would have told you that every turn is drifty, that the ski is never 100% engaged like a railroad and a train -- right?
and that lateral deviations in the drift are lost fractions of seconds, right?
lost time is lost time. you can't get it back.
you can set up a line with drift in mind, obviously. rally car drivers do this all the time! so do speedway and flat-track motorcycle racers, and motocross racers in certain turns.
still, the engaged line is the fastest line -- always.
I would suggest this is true:
people can be their fastest when they are most self-confident; self-confidence tends to follow enjoyment; and if someone really enjoys drifting and is highly skilled, he will probably be very fast even with a super drifty line.
at the same time,
if he could eliminate the drift and stay hooked up, he'd be even faster.
so that's something to think about.
Don't be ridiculous. You are not the universal arbiter of what's funny. And this forum (RM DH) is not the universe, either.Your audience is the reason you are not funny. And that is your fault not ours as much as you would like to think otherwise
Oh I'm with you. 3MG was pretty bad. Lifecycles was also pretty bad in terms of riding. I didn't even like Follow Me until Gee and Stevie kicked some arse down some mountain in NZ at the very end. The latest crop of videos has not been to my taste.I'm sure 3 Minute Gaps has some bizarre type of positive stoke that just doesn't click for me.
Yep. Different torsional stiffnesses for different firmnesses of course and different speeds in-course. Different tunes to edges for different courses.Yes the only real time you can engage the skies like 99.9 % is a flat slope with a surface that has massive amount of grip. If you try to engage the skies 100% in a more pitched slope you wont make it far, then it actually feels like you are train but on a to straight rail road, here plays strength a big part. If you are strong enough and can work through the ski propoerly you can control it somewhat but even pros can bitch about to sharp skies. Anyone who has raced seriously knows this, thats why pros even have diffrent skies with different torsional stiffness since having just enough edge grip is key. This is why skies are usually sharper in the front to the end of the heel and the tails are a little less sharp. so they can slide just a smidge before you put down pressure to help ease the front tips around. I have had one traing session super grippy conditions and boy was it fun. The lean angles we could get was ridiculous.
I think you got what I meant, since I agree with what you said about lost time. By lateral deviation I meant there's an ideal, fastest line for a given course, and when your turn has too much drift and takes you wide, it's lost ground, ground you have to try to make up with a line change (going straighter).Not sure about what you mean by the lateral deviations but any way sliding is loosing speed, loosing speed = loosing time, not having a throttle that time means you have to do some other part faster then what the fastest did. Which will be quite hard as you just f'cked up in this corner which will haunt you for the next 3+ turns. So you cant really do stuff that just feels good it have to controlled and fast. This means minimizing the ammount of time you slide in to the turns.
Interested in hearing responses on this. I'm not a drifter, I'm a carver, though when I rode motos I drifted a lot and used to have fun playing flat-track. I've never tried to be fast while drifting because it's counter-intuitive to me.A question to everbody, how many can drift with both feet up on the pedals intentionely? If drift and put your foot down it would take longer to get back on the gas, would that gain in time by drifting offset the increase an extra pedal stroke?
got it...FAIL!
I grew up in DC but left in 1986...oops...I mean 1994 (left in 86 for grad school, came back 91-94 for a brief period working in DC), so my sense of the place is frozen in time. I'm glad you're up on where men go trolling for other men though! Probably a valuable geographic detail in this forum!
When I left, the hipsters were leaving Adams-Morgan for U Street, because A-M got gentrified.
Logan Circle? Isn't that where the FEMALE hookers used to troll, with unspoken approval from DC Metro PD?
Yeah the technical side of skiing which is more based on "feel" than actuall real hard facts. can be much worse that dh sometimes.Yep. Different torsional stiffnesses for different firmnesses of course and different speeds in-course. Different tunes to edges for different courses.
A bit too techie for my tastes though. I prefer the approach of get to know one bike, one pair of skis, and know them well. However, I appreciate the technical discipline, even if I don't necessarily practice it myself. It reminds me of playing with damper tunes, spring weight, tire psi.
I think you got what I meant, since I agree with what you said about lost time. By lateral deviation I meant there's an ideal, fastest line for a given course, and when your turn has too much drift and takes you wide, it's lost ground, ground you have to try to make up with a line change (going straighter).
Bode Miller's skiing is a perfect example of constant line recovery -- he tries to ski straight, he often loses his line, and his ridiculous athleticism and strength often let him recover. If he tried to race past the age of 40 he'd have to change tactics, as his body won't support that style for a lot longer.
Interested in hearing responses on this. I'm not a drifter, I'm a carver, though when I rode motos I drifted a lot and used to have fun playing flat-track. I've never tried to be fast while drifting because it's counter-intuitive to me.
You act like I do not know that I am 50 and that people like you are younger than me, and have had different experiences -- fewer, and overall more referent to juvenilia.
WOah, wait... are you really 50?You act like I do not know that I am 50 and that people like you are younger than me, and have had different experiences -- fewer, and overall more referent to juvenilia.
see post #133WOah, wait... are you really 50?
Interesting, but... sadly wrong at every turn. Assumptions = failure; assumptions about another's state of mind, intent, or purpose = glorious failure, going down in flames.I would argue that knowledge is measured by experience, not in years.
So much of your opinion is justified by being "older and wiser" than everyone else in this thread simply by age. And in turn you dismiss others for the same reason.
You are only as intelligent as you think you are, and that is based on your flawed scale of time, not actual learning.
Someone else will be by to feed you soon, and if not you can start another thread just like this one and beg for attention there as well.
It's been fun
Cheers
all of the above.Are you talking about Silvia or Lifecycles?
I was not a fan of the Lifecycles photoshop segment, despite that being the best shooting in the whole video...
You should probably drink your own piss rather than spraying it around.Assumptions = failure; assumptions about another's state of mind, intent, or purpose = glorious failure, going down in flames.
You see, as you get older, things that you used to like start looking and sounding like sh*t. And things that seemed sh*tty as a child don't seem as sh*tty. With you, somehow, the wires have gotten crossed and everything looks and sounds like sh*t to you. It's a condition called "being a cynical asshole." And there's no known cure, I'm afraid. Everything just seems sh*tty, and everyone starts to seem sh*tty, and everything they say just starts to thhpppbpptbhpptp tthhhppbbtt thbpt thhhhbbbbbbbttttbbtbttbInteresting, but... sadly wrong at every turn. Assumptions = failure; assumptions about another's state of mind, intent, or purpose = glorious failure, going down in flames.
Thanks for taking the Uncle Josh's cheeseball bait though.
You're one smart catfish!
F*ck you kyle, you're a piece of sh*t.You see, as you get older, things that you used to like start looking and sounding like sh*t. And things that seemed sh*tty as a child don't seem as sh*tty. With you, somehow, the wires have gotten crossed and everything looks and sounds like sh*t to you. It's a condition called "being a cynical asshole." And there's no known cure, I'm afraid. Everything just seems sh*tty, and everyone starts to seem sh*tty, and everything they say just starts to thhpppbpptbhpptp tthhhppbbtt thbpt thhhhbbbbbbbttttbbtbttb
Negative. I was stoked to learn I was only off by a few years... married? How do you feel about fully rigid bikes?I'm sorry, did I break a rule you had in your brain for what someone is supposed to do at a certain age?
(look at them all scrambling to establish superiority, Cletus... ain't they a hoot?)
There's a whoooole lot of everything else here, too.I don't think many people disagreed with him about 3MG.
Just everything else.
I don't think many people disagreed with him about 3MG.
Just everything else.