i was doing some thinking the other day, which can be dangerous. a 8.75 shock with a 2.75 stroke compresses to 6" eye to eye. a 9x3 shock compresses to the same 6" i 2 i. this leads me to assume that the only difference between the two shock sizes is a .25" longer shaft. so why couldn't i install a longer shaft on my current shock to get more travel from my bike.
- my frame gets 7" of travel from an 8.75 x 2.75 shock
- fitting a 9x3 shock would net ~7.8" travel
- it is a very desirable but older frame that fits me well
- without the shock mounted, the swingarm gets 10+" of travel before linkage binds
- the shock i run is made by a major manufacturer, located in my city, and i have several friends who can raid parts piles for whatever i need.
- i can get really courageous with a dremel and move the upper shock eye hole on the frame .25" and not alter the static geometry with a longer shock, but gain more travel (which would do cool things like make it slacker and lower when i get on it). i know people did a similar mod with older DHRs to make them slacker and had no issues.
how dumb is this idea? do i fail at math and bikes?
- my frame gets 7" of travel from an 8.75 x 2.75 shock
- fitting a 9x3 shock would net ~7.8" travel
- it is a very desirable but older frame that fits me well
- without the shock mounted, the swingarm gets 10+" of travel before linkage binds
- the shock i run is made by a major manufacturer, located in my city, and i have several friends who can raid parts piles for whatever i need.
- i can get really courageous with a dremel and move the upper shock eye hole on the frame .25" and not alter the static geometry with a longer shock, but gain more travel (which would do cool things like make it slacker and lower when i get on it). i know people did a similar mod with older DHRs to make them slacker and had no issues.
how dumb is this idea? do i fail at math and bikes?