Quantcast

A Greener Apple

stinkyboy

Plastic Santa
Jan 6, 2005
15,187
1
¡Phoenix!
Apple has been criticized by some environmental organizations for not being a leader in removing toxic chemicals from its new products, and for not aggressively or properly recycling its old products. Upon investigating Apple’s current practices and progress towards these goals, I was surprised to learn that in many cases Apple is ahead of, or will soon be ahead of, most of its competitors in these areas. Whatever other improvements we need to make, it is certainly clear that we have failed to communicate the things that we are doing well.

It is generally not Apple’s policy to trumpet our plans for the future; we tend to talk about the things we have just accomplished. Unfortunately this policy has left our customers, shareholders, employees and the industry in the dark about Apple’s desires and plans to become greener. Our stakeholders deserve and expect more from us, and they’re right to do so. They want us to be a leader in this area, just as we are in the other areas of our business. So today we’re changing our policy:http://www.apple.com/hotnews/agreenerapple/
 

Kornphlake

Turbo Monkey
Oct 8, 2002
2,632
1
Portland, OR
That sounds pretty much like any other company's environmental policy, but they specifically address lead, mercury, pvc, PBBPE (or however that's abbreviated)... All of those substances are restricted by RoHS with the exception of PVC, it seems to me that Apple is complying with regulations that allow them to sell in the EU and conveniently calling it an environmental policy. They may have been ahead of schedule in eliminating a couple of substances through obsolecence of antiquated technology but they aren't really doing more than any other company, except Lenovo, Dell and HP apparently.

I'm not complimenting or criticizing, just pointing out facts, RoHS forced many american manufacturers to be more environmentally friendly to be allowed into the European market, environmental policies centered on legislation seem redundant. Chris King makes a big deal about what he does to protect the environment when in reality CK is not much different than the job shop down the street except for the fact that he trumpets his environmental policy.