So last night I had a bit of a spat with my ladyfriend over the shape of the perfect urinal. She is an architecture grad student with a strong sense of design. I have a penis, and have had it for 25 years. Thus, we both think we know a thing or two about how a urinal should be designed. I have never met a urinal that didn't splatter at least a tiny bit, so here is my idea
Mine: essentially an inverted orange street cone shape draining downward (maybe -60 degrees from horizontal) with a slight arc, terminating at a gooseneck (sump?). The opening would be flared out, but the flanges would also drain down. There would likely be no splatter, and if so, it would be deflected down a tube rather than back at my khaki shorts.
Hers: Similar to mine, but bulbous and not angled as heavily. The way it was drawn, the lip closest to the user was actually turned in on itself, which seems like it would be hard to clean automatically with a flush (my biggest gripe and the source of our "bigger issues" coversation).
So, what do you all think. Ever run into a urinal that couldn't use improvement. Seems that this would have been solved long ago, and not likely by a bunch of cyclists, but who knows...
Mine: essentially an inverted orange street cone shape draining downward (maybe -60 degrees from horizontal) with a slight arc, terminating at a gooseneck (sump?). The opening would be flared out, but the flanges would also drain down. There would likely be no splatter, and if so, it would be deflected down a tube rather than back at my khaki shorts.
Hers: Similar to mine, but bulbous and not angled as heavily. The way it was drawn, the lip closest to the user was actually turned in on itself, which seems like it would be hard to clean automatically with a flush (my biggest gripe and the source of our "bigger issues" coversation).
So, what do you all think. Ever run into a urinal that couldn't use improvement. Seems that this would have been solved long ago, and not likely by a bunch of cyclists, but who knows...