Quantcast

a view from africa

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
from NYTimes Select, Kristof

The founding president of this country was a witch doctor who murdered tens of thousands, put enemies’ heads on pikes, denounced education and spread land mines on the road out of his country to prevent people from fleeing. This was then so vile a place that an American diplomat stabbed another to death here in 1971 and claimed in his trial that he had been driven insane partly by the screams of all the people being tortured.

When the president was finally ousted in 1979, he ran off into the bush with $60 million packed in suitcases. But he was pursued, and in a shootout, the nation’s entire foreign exchange reserves burned up.

This little country of Equatorial Guinea was, therefore, a useful place to visit with Casey Parks, the student journalist who won a contest to accompany me on this trip — because it underscores one of the biggest challenges facing Africa today.

That is the need for better governance, meaning both less corruption and better economic policies. The single greatest need to fight poverty and injustice isn’t more aid, although that is needed. What matters most is the local decision makers. The single biggest reason Africa is so poor is that it has had unusually bad leadership — a reflection, in turn, of colonial misrule.

Equatorial Guinea traditionally has been Africa’s poster boy for bad governance. Even after the old witch doctor was ousted, the kleptocracy continued under Teodoro Obiang, the current president. A new book about the country, “The Wonga Coup,” notes that in 2004 President Obiang bought a Boeing 737, one of six personal planes, for $55 million, and outfitted it with a king-sized bed and gold-plated fittings in the extra-large bathroom.

Schools and clinics are needy, but Forbes lists President Obiang as the world’s eighth richest ruler, with a net worth of $600 million. Just last year, “The Wonga Coup” says, the president’s son spent the equivalent of a third of his country’s entire education budget on a vacation home in South Africa and three cars — two Bentleys and a Lamborghini.

That is grotesque, but it is changing. Here in Equatorial Guinea, torture has diminished, and two opposition members of Parliament provide token public criticism. The government is participating in Tony Blair’s anticorruption initiative (a terrific program to help poor countries), and Prime Minister Ricardo Mangue told me that his government would begin publishing budgets to try to ensure more transparency.

We should help developing countries broadly, not just by writing checks but also by holding their feet to the fire on corruption and economic reform. An excellent new U.S. aid program, the Millennium Challenge Accounts, rewards good governance, and we can do even more. For example, as Joseph Stiglitz notes in his new book, “Making Globalization Work,” the West can modify bank secrecy rules so that it is harder for dictators to pillage their lands.

The time is right, because all across Africa, countries are increasing efforts to fight corruption and improve the investment climate. The World Bank’s latest “Doing Business” report shows that some African countries, particularly Tanzania, Ghana, Rwanda and Nigeria, are among the world leaders in reforming their economies.

And where African countries have had sustained good governance, economies have boomed. Examples include Botswana, Mozambique, Rwanda and Mauritius, which in turn are becoming models for neighbors.

Partly as a result, Africa is enjoying an overall economic growth rate this year of 5 to 6 percent, twice that of the U.S. And Africa now has a huge opportunity to move up the ladder into low-wage manufacturing, because Chinese labor costs are rising and some labor-intensive production is being shipped to lower-wage countries. Chinese traders are now everywhere in Africa, although they haven’t set up many factories so far. [ohio: could these be EHM?]

Senegal has snared a share of the French-language call-center industry, and a few countries, like Mauritius, Lesotho and Namibia, make garments, but manufacturers have generally shunned Africa because of concerns about infrastructure, political instability, corruption and ability to scale up production. If Africa plays its cards right, that could change.

So, yes, Africa is still afflicted by AIDS, misery and the tyranny of “big men” whose sons squander national treasure on Lamborghinis. But leadership is improving, opportunities are appearing, and there’s something new in the air: reform, and hope.
 

ALEXIS_DH

Tirelessly Awesome
Jan 30, 2003
6,261
881
Lima, Peru, Peru
i´m coming to the conclussion that certain countries are flat out inviable.

i remember reading a whole study on that many years ago (it included a few SA countries and many many african) and thinking "thats a bunch of imperalist bull****", but the more time passes by and he more i see, the more convinced i become.
there is a point when national pride/indentity (due to the people´s own stupidity or ruthlessness) becomes so socially expensive, its just retarded to keep pushing.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
[ohio: could these be EHM?]
Don't know if this was meant as tongue in cheek, but no. The EHM model is to provide aid in the form of loans to governments. Private sector foreign investment in private sector ventures would have hard (but not impossible time) adopting that model.

Great article, and from my limited knowledge spot on. For my own education, I would have liked to see more specifics on the roots of the culture of corruption and the methods now being used somehwat successsfully to build in transparency and accountability. I'm sure there are more detailed discussions out there... I just need to hunt them down.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
Don't know if this was meant as tongue in cheek, but no. The EHM model is to provide aid in the form of loans to governments. Private sector foreign investment in private sector ventures would have hard (but not impossible time) adopting that model.
i'm up to chapter 10, and what the chinese were briefly described as doing in the article seemed to be in the realm of EHM
 

ALEXIS_DH

Tirelessly Awesome
Jan 30, 2003
6,261
881
Lima, Peru, Peru
Great article, and from my limited knowledge spot on. For my own education, I would have liked to see more specifics on the roots of the culture of corruption and the methods now being used somehwat successsfully to build in transparency and accountability. I'm sure there are more detailed discussions out there... I just need to hunt them down.

in my opinion, corruption has a lot to do with social rewards to certain behaviours.
there is certain social admiration for those who make a living without working, or skimming others. there is not only a lack of condemn to corruption, but instead there is a form of admiration.
they are not frowned upon, but socially these people are deemed as "smart" or "street smart". and those who obbey laws and order against their best interest are deemed "dumb". (for example, stopping at a red light at midnight under no traffic is widely considered dumb).

it doesnt really have to do 100% with money. there was a case last month about a peruvian supreme judge (they recently got a raise, hoping to loewr corruption, to $110k a year, about 50 times minumum wage) receiving a $180 bribe from an undercover person. $180 bucks!, that was enough bribe for him to forfeit a career and ethics.
a congressman was bribed to swing to fujimori´s party for only $15k. and they make about $150k a year. money is hardly the only reason.

then i also read a theory on corruption and wealth accumulation being influenced by the religion of the habitants. protestants, by upbringing, being less prone to corruption and more prone to savings, and catholics being more prone to corruption and more prone to spending.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
http://www.ehmtech.com/

mission statement: "Our mission is to provide a gateway for forward thinking Chinese factories to prosper in the lucrative American marketplace. "


i don't think i can hate china enough.
 

rockwool

Turbo Monkey
Apr 19, 2004
2,658
0
Filastin
Good article!

in my opinion, corruption has a lot to do with social rewards to certain behaviours.
there is certain social admiration for those who make a living without working, or skimming others. there is not only a lack of condemn to corruption, but instead there is a form of admiration.
they are not frowned upon, but socially these people are deemed as "smart" or "street smart". and those who obbey laws and order against their best interest are deemed "dumb". (for example, stopping at a red light at midnight under no traffic is widely considered dumb).

it doesnt really have to do 100% with money. there was a case last month about a peruvian supreme judge (they recently got a raise, hoping to loewr corruption, to $110k a year, about 50 times minumum wage) receiving a $180 bribe from an undercover person. $180 bucks!, that was enough bribe for him to forfeit a career and ethics.
a congressman was bribed to swing to fujimori´s party for only $15k. and they make about $150k a year. money is hardly the only reason.

then i also read a theory on corruption and wealth accumulation being influenced by the religion of the habitants. protestants, by upbringing, being less prone to corruption and more prone to savings, and catholics being more prone to corruption and more prone to spending.
Your congressmen are making $150k a year? How the F are they supposed to represent the people and have an understanding of their lives with salaries of that magnatude?!!

I agree that there is a social admiration for people that fool the gvmnt in a big way. These guys are ocnsidered "smart" and those who don't skimm the gvmnt are considered "dumb".