Quantcast

ABC's "The Path to 9/11"

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
:greedy:

With the Path to 9/11 DVD, the Samizdat may come to America

We note the intense efforts of the Democratic Party and the Clinton Administration to censor or cancel the movie, The Path to 9/11. In addition, govenment officials have obliquely threatened ABC with adverse government action under the Communications Act of 1934. The most peculiar thing about this attempt at censorship, coercion, and prior restraint is that the movie already has been distributed to some people as a DVD.

The furor by the Clintonians and the institutional Democratic Party is very interesting. It could have a number of sources, one of them benign, many of them not. Whatever the source of the outrage, none of the outcomes for the censorship proponents seem very good, since the director’s cut DVD has already been released to some people throughout the country. If ABC heavily edits the movie to eliminate elements offensive to the government officials, those scenes will be made available no doubt on the internet for side-by-side comparisons. If ABC cancels the movie entirely, so much the better. Woe betide the American who ever listens again to this group of Democrats as they declaim on the sacred rights of free speech — and furthermore, the DVD will still be out there.

Just for fun, let’s take a look at a worst case scenario, in which the movie is changed in ways that definitively alter its meaning — that would turn the existing DVD’s of the original movie into gold overnight. They would be pirated; they could be sold on eBay for hundreds of dollars perhaps. Then what might happen? What could be the next phase of government repression, we ask? How eager could their corporate lapdogs be to carry out their masters’ wishes? Will ABC attempt to recover and destroy all copies of the director’s cut DVD? Will they sue anyone who posts passages on the internet? Will the brave Senators Reid, Durbin, Stabenow, Schumer, and Dorgan try to pass a law to throw the offenders in jail?

In the bad old days of the Cold War, the Samizdat (самиздат) was a clandestine publishing system within the Soviet Union and Societ bloc countries, by which forbidden or unpublishable literature was reproduced and circulated privately. Authors from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn to Milan Kundera found their way to millions of readers via Samizdat. Depending on the degree of censorship and political correctness ultimately imposed upon ABC, it is possible that the name Cyrus Nowrasteh could be added to the list of banned authors.

Obviously, we don’t expect things to get that bad, but the outrage of the Democratic government censor wannabes is highly instructive. Do they think the public is so stupid that it can be swayed by a few minutes of this or that? Are they that thin-skinned that they think one mini-series among the millions of broadcast hours each year will make some difference? Do they treasure propaganda that highly, and fear its loss so much? Are they right about the public and propaganda? Perhaps many Americans are so weak-minded and impressionable today — but if that is true, how do they have the stamina to sit through a five-hour mini-series, let alone get up to vote in November?
 

DaveW

Space Monkey
Jul 2, 2001
11,751
3,242
The bunker at parliament
Do they think the public is so stupid that it can be swayed by a few minutes of this or that? Are they that thin-skinned that they think one mini-series among the millions of broadcast hours each year will make some difference? Do they treasure propaganda that highly, and fear its loss so much? Are they right about the public and propaganda? Perhaps many Americans are so weak-minded and impressionable today — but if that is true, how do they have the stamina to sit through a five-hour mini-series, let alone get up to vote in November?
Riiiight....This would be the same public of whom 40% still think saddam was behind 9-11?
would they be influenced by this show?...... You betcha a lot of them will be. :plthumbsdown: :disgust1:
 

stevew

resident influencer
Sep 21, 2001
41,368
10,301
Now top Democrats have written a letter to ABC that can reasonably be read as a threat to pull the network's broadcast license if it shows Path to 9/11:

Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events. ***

We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program.
One less major network would be nice.
 

skinny mike

Turbo Monkey
Jan 24, 2005
6,415
0
The dems seem to be pissy because they blame 9-11 on Clinton. I haven't heard about anything else.
i don't get why they blame it on clinton. i don't remember hearing about any sort of plans to tighten down on homeland security before 9/11.
 

RenegadeRick

98th percentile on my SAT & all I got was this tin
i don't get why they blame it on clinton. i don't remember hearing about any sort of plans to tighten down on homeland security before 9/11.
Here is a Variety article on what the dems are so upset about:
As for specific criticisms -- and changes -- the original mini contained a scene in which then-National Security Adviser Sandy Berger declines to give the CIA authority to capture or kill Osama bin Laden, even when CIA operatives know where the al-Qaeda leader is.

"This account has been expressly contradicted by Richard Clarke, a high-ranking counterterrorism official in both the Clinton and Bush administrations," certain lawmakers wrote in a letter to Disney topper Bob Iger.
of course, ABC is saying it is a dramatization and not exactly factual:
ABC limited its response to the brouhaha to a single statement arguing its mini "is not a documentary of the events leading to 9/11. It is a dramatization, drawn from a variety of sources including the 9/11 Commission Report, other published materials and personal interviews. As such, for dramatic and narrative purposes, the movie contains fictionalized scenes, composite and representative characters and dialogue and time compression.
But with 40+% of surveyed Americans, and 60+% of surveyed republicans still believing that Saddam had something to do with 9-11, who can blame them for worrying that people might get the wrong idea.
 

RenegadeRick

98th percentile on my SAT & all I got was this tin
What's the big deal about 9/11 anyway. 3000 fewer lawyers and tax cheats. How can you go wrong?
Um, my uncle was in WTC 1. The plane basically landed on his desk and he was identified from a bone fragment. He was married to my Mother-In-Law's much younger sister, so he was really close in age to my wife and I. In fact for a time my wife's family had to move back in with her parents, so the two were really more like sisters. He was 34. I was 31. We had visited on holidays, went to stay at their place when they lived in Pennsylvania, went to Newport, RI together. My wife stood up in their wedding, and we had to drive to NY from Chicago for his funeral service because there were no planes flying in the US when we left. He worked in IT for Marsh USA. He wasn't a lawyer, and I have no evidence of him cheating on his taxes.

Oh, but who gives a funk anyway? 3,000 dead are just a drop in the bucket compared to the countless thousands dead in Iraq, including:
More than 2,600 US troops have been killed in Iraq since the invasion, a shocking enough toll but one swamped by the number of Iraqis who have died in sectarian violence, with more than 1,500 killed in Baghdad just last month.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20386237-2703,00.html