Quantcast

Adjustable brakes on new Commencal???

Discussion in 'Downhill & Freeride' started by EVRAC, Feb 29, 2008.

  1. EVRAC

    EVRAC Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    1 / 9
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2004
    Messages:
    756
    Location:
    Port Coquitlam, B.C., Canada
    Something's not right with this:



    How can different brake positions affect brake squat if the caliper is bolted to the swingarm. It's still the same rotor radius and angular deceleration. It will also cause the same torque on the swingarm. I think they're out to lunch on this one. Could be to do with the adjustable cs length, and the pr guys totally bungled it.
     

    Please register to disable this ad.

  2. ZHendo

    ZHendo Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    6 / 37
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,553
    Location:
    PNW
    the adjustable chainstay idea is pretty cool, but i too am skeptical of their claims regarding different levels of squat in the braking. i don't think it's possible to change the squat features unless it has some semi-floating design integrated into it that is somehow adjustable.
     
  3. jonKranked

    jonKranked Press Button, Receive Stupid

    Rep/Likes:
    377 / 3,679
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    54,245
    Location:
    media blackout
    ok let me try to explain this as clearly as possible...

    when a disc brake is activated, it creates a force tangent to the point the caliper is contacting the rotor, and the vector direction of the force will be relative (or is it opposite?) to the direction the wheel is spinning. By changing the point at which the caliper contacts the rotor, you change the angle of the tangent direction of the force. this will affect your suspension performance based on the angle between the swingarm motion and the tangent direction of the brake force.
     
  4. davep

    davep Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    3,279
    Location:
    seattle
    Nope.

    If that were the case, you could eleminate brake induced squat on a single pivot by simply 'pointing the vector' at the pivot.
     
  5. jonKranked

    jonKranked Press Button, Receive Stupid

    Rep/Likes:
    377 / 3,679
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    54,245
    Location:
    media blackout
    that couldn't work because the angular motion of the swingarm and the rotor are counter to one another (because of the location of the 2 axes in relation to one another). 2 opposite circles with 2 opposite forces that would only be truly parallel (and opposite) one another for only an instant at a single point. also, the angle (to ground normal) of the braking force changes as the bike moves through its travel, so its dependent on that as well.
     
  6. jonKranked

    jonKranked Press Button, Receive Stupid

    Rep/Likes:
    377 / 3,679
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    54,245
    Location:
    media blackout
    a side note on the above... with a fixed caliper the tangent angle of the braking force is dependent on the swingarm's position in its travel.

    with a floating caliper brake mount, the point at which the caliper contacts the rotor stays in essentially the same position (and hence the angle of the braking force changes very little) regardless of where the bike is in its travel. this makes the braking forces fundamentally independent of the suspension. the downside? weight++
     
  7. Fulton

    Fulton Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2001
    Messages:
    825
    where did you quote this from? sounds like bs to me.
     
  8. Steve M

    Steve M Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    6 / 23
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,997
    Location:
    Whistler
    Davep is correct as usual. You're totally forgetting that whatever force is generated at the caliper has to be opposed by a force at the axle, otherwise the wheel would translate relative to the swingarm, which clearly it can't. This creates a couple moment that is totally independent of the caliper's position anywhere around the rotor. The other force at work is the horizontal force acting through the axle (equal to the tyre's tractive force) which is what provides your actual deceleration. The moment generated by this is a product of the IC/pivot height over axle (which might be zero) multiplied by the horizontal deceleration force. If this is zero, the only pro-squat effect will be from the couple moment generated by the caliper/axle reaction pair. Neither of these components are affected by the position/orientation of the caliper on the swingarm or relative to the axle. The Commencal claim is simply false.
     
  9. kerbdrop

    kerbdrop Chimp

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    3
    I hope you are joking? :twitch:
     
  10. jonKranked

    jonKranked Press Button, Receive Stupid

    Rep/Likes:
    377 / 3,679
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    54,245
    Location:
    media blackout


    thanks for the clarification :thumb:
     
  11. ChrisKring

    ChrisKring Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    6 / 4
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2002
    Messages:
    2,398
    Location:
    Grand Haven, MI

    Good analysis. I was sketching out the forces and moments because I was sure that the axle was providing an opposing force. Thanks for saving me the time.
     
  12. EVRAC

    EVRAC Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    1 / 9
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2004
    Messages:
    756
    Location:
    Port Coquitlam, B.C., Canada
    Thanks DaveP, Socket and ChrisKring. We are in agreement.

    The claim is bs.
     
  13. Hannu

    Hannu Chimp

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    19
    Location:
    Finland
    You should remember that this claim is not made by Commencal, or is it? Where is that first quote from?
     
  14. dhkid

    dhkid Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    6 / 0
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Messages:
    3,359
    Location:
    Malaysia
    i am very surprised that commencal would say something like that, i really hope its not coming from them.:disgust1:
     
  15. EVRAC

    EVRAC Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    1 / 9
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2004
    Messages:
    756
    Location:
    Port Coquitlam, B.C., Canada
  16. P.T.W

    P.T.W Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    5 / 0
    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    600
    Location:
    christchurch nz
    Does anybody remember the 1st protype Tomac 204 single pivot(the 1 after the Lawall frame)It was displayed with a so called floating brake,but the lever arm was conected back to the swing arm near the pivot.:banghead:
    The article said somthing along the lines that when Doug Bradbury was questioned about this,he replied that seeing as the torque rod pointed at the main pivot it transferd braking forces back into it????WTF:crazy:
    Right up to that point i used to admire an lust after anything that Doug designed.Funny that it disapeared on the production frames tho:clapping: