Well, I REALLY wanted aperture to work, but it falls short. Since the first release it has been flawed. They are slowly ironing the problems out, but it left a bad taste in my mouth.Damn, yer right - Apple Aperture. ugh.
Well, I'm liking it for a few specific features. I'm guessing Transcend has a much higher demand list than I do - I'm purely amateur but I can't abide by the iPhoto limitations.
I have and use Photoshop CS1 and don't need to upgrade it, but i've also got well over 4,000 digital images to manage and Photoshop's browser is too clunky when doing the big numbers...
Wait, he paid for 1.5? It is a free update to 1.0.... I hope he didn't sell it to you for full price, they dropped the price like $300 recently.Well, Fraze - I'll be the last one to ever say you're not forthcoming with pithy and useful responses!
Thanks!
I'll muddle along with Aperture for a bit - see what I can update/edit/create and keep an eye out for CaptureOne - I bought this Aperture from a local photog who was upgrading to an Intel mac and got a deal on the newer 1.5.
Still beats my complaints about iPhoto, tho. Both are no speed-demons... Not that i'd notice on my G4 powerbook, either way...
No, i think he got it as a favor from the local apple store - he does some work for them. no cost for his upgrade, very very cheap for my used software so no complaints...Wait, he paid for 1.5? It is a free update to 1.0.... I hope he didn't sell it to you for full price, they dropped the price like $300 recently.
For the g4 powerbook, all digi darkroom apps suck. The only one that felt the least bit snappy was Iview, and it doesn't process raw files. I fought with C1 forever until I just realized my powerbook is slow. I still use it when on the road however and just deal with it.
Grab the demos of the other aps and give 'em a spin just to try them out, see what works best for you and your workflow. I am constantly trying new photo related apps in search of the holy grail. Maybe Aperture 2.0 will nail it.
Actually, it doesn't. Only select jobs are passed along to the GPU. Most of the work comes from the main processors as usual. In fact, even with the fastest mac vid cards out there, aperture is still laggy and none of the interface and general program work is offloaded.What GPU is in your Mac? Aperture does most of its processing on the GPU.
I completely missed your link.Follow the link. Iview Media pro. It is a professional digital asset management program.
What's with this thread and the spam?Hi
Der Fehler muss also irgenwo in der Win-Registrierung liegen.
Hat jemand ne Idee wo ich suchen muss ?
Bye
I prefer capture one as I can do batches at a time and see more than one photo and adjust more than one photo. You can't really do that in Adobe Raw, and bridge was a HUGE pile of crap - and still didn't do it well. The new CS3 bridge seems much better, but still the same complaints adjustment wise.Transcend, what do you think of Adobe Camera Raw vs. Capture One? Do you find Capture one a lot quicker?
Yeah, i had a chance to use bridge for cs2 and considered it e-swill...I prefer capture one as I can do batches at a time and see more than one photo and adjust more than one photo. You can't really do that in Adobe Raw, and bridge was a HUGE pile of crap - and still didn't do it well. The new CS3 bridge seems much better, but still the same complaints adjustment wise.