yeah...about that 'full stop'...if we are to accept/imply it's best left to consenting, unmarried, non-direct relatives, we have to examine why anything less than this is not allowed in polite company, and as such, give the same scrutiny to expanding the privilege.
i know you wrote it's a discussion for another time, but it really can't be just rolled up. my first cousin is smoking hot, but dumb as a bag of hammers. if we married (and therefore reproduced), our progeny would be fast-tracked to libertarianism minoring in constitutionalist partyism.
or something.
i don't know what i'm on about. there's a message in there somewhere. a free-mason could decode it. i think i'm saying they'd be first-rate window-licking mongs.
