What a silly question. Of course you should....arguing with myself if i should buy a hellcat gladiator.
What a silly question. Of course you should....arguing with myself if i should buy a hellcat gladiator.
Don't forget to update the lens firmware as well.Charging camera batteries, updating firmwares and on the brink of mental insanity arguing with myself if i should buy a hellcat gladiator.
you must be a canon shooterDon't forget to update the lens firmware as well.
Fine, but there has to be a witty title first.Witty titles > Wingdings
>>> wit wit wit <<<Fine, but there has to be a witty title first.
"Buy a house," they said.A puddle underneath the water heater is a good thing, right?
not really, but I get your gist^^^ tautology
before calling a plumber, take a wrench to each fitting. Big temp swings this past week, just check that it's not a simple fix first.A puddle underneath the water heater is a good thing, right?
This is why our water heater is in the crawl space. If I can't see it, there isn't a problem!A puddle underneath the water heater is a good thing, right?
I think that the average quality of cars is higher, so ‘luxury’ cars don’t stand out so much anymore. It’s basically just like a nice Audi, right? (Even looks like one).So, once in a lifetime trip, so we rented a Bentley. At least that's what they told us. Bentley quality has gone WAAY down, IMO. View attachment 167612
I hope actually you rented that weird blue (better by basically every measure) thing next to it…So, once in a lifetime trip, so we rented a Bentley. At least that's what they told us. Bentley quality has gone WAAY down, IMO. View attachment 167612
pretty sure that was actually designed as the poor man's bentley
Yep, but Sigma needs it too.you must be a canon shooter
Perhaps he plans to die at 65?Today's head against the wall: conversation with plow driver.
Me: Mathematically it is not possible for you to retire at 60
Driver: I don't agree with you.
Me: You don't get Social Security. The only acct you have, which is effectively your replacement for SS, doesn't have enough and doesn't get enough annually to outpace the amount your SS would be.
Driver: I disagree that it's the same as my SS.
Me: You can, but you're incorrect. You need to save more money into the other account you have available if you want to retire anytime before 70.
Driver: I still disagree and don't think you know what your talking about.
Me: Given I deal with this exact situation 20yrs in the future of this conversation on a regular basis, I know I am correct. You can disagree, but I am correct.
Driver: So how is this invested?
Me: We invest it for you.
Driver: Who chose that?
Me: You did. Via the website 3 years ago.
Driver: I didn't mean to do that. I want my money back.
Me: Before making that selection, you were in a cash fund that made 1.5% over the whole time period. Your RoR over the same period has been 85%. If the transaction was erroneous, we undo the entire transaction.
Driver: But that's my money.
Me: Not if the transaction was erroneous and we're refunding fees because of the erroneous transaction. We move you back to your original position and RoR accordingly.
Driver: I don't think you know what you're doing. I want to manage my own money!
Me: Great. Click this button on the website and it's all yours. My original statement still stands. It's mathematically impossible for you to retire at 60. You need an annual 55% RoR for 20 years to assume you will be able to hit you current income. That doesn't account for lifestyle creep. Good luck.
Odds the plow driver will remember this conversation when he's 80 and broke = 0%Today's head against the wall: conversation with plow driver.
Me: Mathematically it is not possible for you to retire at 60
Driver: I don't agree with you.
Me: You don't get Social Security. The only acct you have, which is effectively your replacement for SS, doesn't have enough and doesn't get enough annually to outpace the amount your SS would be.
Driver: I disagree that it's the same as my SS.
Me: You can, but you're incorrect. You need to save more money into the other account you have available if you want to retire anytime before 70.
Driver: I still disagree and don't think you know what your talking about.
Me: Given I deal with this exact situation 20yrs in the future of this conversation on a regular basis, I know I am correct. You can disagree, but I am correct.
Driver: So how is this invested?
Me: We invest it for you.
Driver: Who chose that?
Me: You did. Via the website 3 years ago.
Driver: I didn't mean to do that. I want my money back.
Me: Before making that selection, you were in a cash fund that made 1.5% over the whole time period. Your RoR over the same period has been 85%. If the transaction was erroneous, we undo the entire transaction.
Driver: But that's my money.
Me: Not if the transaction was erroneous and we're refunding fees because of the erroneous transaction. We move you back to your original position and RoR accordingly.
Driver: I don't think you know what you're doing. I want to manage my own money!
Me: Great. Click this button on the website and it's all yours. My original statement still stands. It's mathematically impossible for you to retire at 60. You need an annual 55% RoR for 20 years to assume you will be able to hit you current income. That doesn't account for lifestyle creep. Good luck.
i would have clocked him with the keyboard...Perhaps he plans to die at 65?
His name again is Mr Plow!Today's head against the wall: conversation with plow driver.
Me: Mathematically it is not possible for you to retire at 60
Driver: I don't agree with you.
Me: You don't get Social Security. The only acct you have, which is effectively your replacement for SS, doesn't have enough and doesn't get enough annually to outpace the amount your SS would be.
Driver: I disagree that it's the same as my SS.
Me: You can, but you're incorrect. You need to save more money into the other account you have available if you want to retire anytime before 70.
Driver: I still disagree and don't think you know what your talking about.
Me: Given I deal with this exact situation 20yrs in the future of this conversation on a regular basis, I know I am correct. You can disagree, but I am correct.
Driver: So how is this invested?
Me: We invest it for you.
Driver: Who chose that?
Me: You did. Via the website 3 years ago.
Driver: I didn't mean to do that. I want my money back.
Me: Before making that selection, you were in a cash fund that made 1.5% over the whole time period. Your RoR over the same period has been 85%. If the transaction was erroneous, we undo the entire transaction.
Driver: But that's my money.
Me: Not if the transaction was erroneous and we're refunding fees because of the erroneous transaction. We move you back to your original position and RoR accordingly.
Driver: I don't think you know what you're doing. I want to manage my own money!
Me: Great. Click this button on the website and it's all yours. My original statement still stands. It's mathematically impossible for you to retire at 60. You need an annual 55% RoR for 20 years to assume you will be able to hit you current income. That doesn't account for lifestyle creep. Good luck.
Brawndo. With electrolytes. What plants crave ™.Today's head against the wall: conversation with plow driver.
Me: Mathematically it is not possible for you to retire at 60
Driver: I don't agree with you.
Me: You don't get Social Security. The only acct you have, which is effectively your replacement for SS, doesn't have enough and doesn't get enough annually to outpace the amount your SS would be.
Driver: I disagree that it's the same as my SS.
Me: You can, but you're incorrect. You need to save more money into the other account you have available if you want to retire anytime before 70.
Driver: I still disagree and don't think you know what your talking about.
Me: Given I deal with this exact situation 20yrs in the future of this conversation on a regular basis, I know I am correct. You can disagree, but I am correct.
Driver: So how is this invested?
Me: We invest it for you.
Driver: Who chose that?
Me: You did. Via the website 3 years ago.
Driver: I didn't mean to do that. I want my money back.
Me: Before making that selection, you were in a cash fund that made 1.5% over the whole time period. Your RoR over the same period has been 85%. If the transaction was erroneous, we undo the entire transaction.
Driver: But that's my money.
Me: Not if the transaction was erroneous and we're refunding fees because of the erroneous transaction. We move you back to your original position and RoR accordingly.
Driver: I don't think you know what you're doing. I want to manage my own money!
Me: Great. Click this button on the website and it's all yours. My original statement still stands. It's mathematically impossible for you to retire at 60. You need an annual 55% RoR for 20 years to assume you will be able to hit you current income. That doesn't account for lifestyle creep. Good luck.
Driver: I don't think you know what you're doing. I want to manage my own money!
he's also assuming it will continue long enough for him to be employed as a plow driver until retirement.Odds the plow driver will remember this conversation when he's 80 and broke = 0%
He'll just blame Mexicans and attend a book burning to celebrate Trump Jr's 4 inauguration instead.