Or inside the snow pit, after digging for 20 min.i reckon you could sit down to change socks on one of dem rox
That you've used such long skis relative to height is highly intriguing to me.technique!
I've hiked on 185-190ish skis of all widths for almost 25 years. It's fine.
If you want a shorter ski for kick turns (more understandable) then that's even more of a case for going wider.
Hiking on 110mm waisted skis is fine. It's almost no different that hiking on 95mm wide.
The most annoying thing to me about hiking on really wide skis is just carrying snow on them.
Johnny Drama on TGR said:I lurk here from time to time when i'm bored at work, but never post. Saw this thread and thought i'd chime in as i have intimate knowledge of this collection; along with the aforementioned Jed, these are my brainchild.
To the people closely involved in the development of these skis, they're affectionately known as "The Facemelters", with the 120 being "The Master of Puppets" https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...=Face Melter [link broke in the cut and paste]
[facemelter.PNG]
To unlock the magic of this ski you need to be able to hear MOP in your head as you drop into a big line. If your skiing can match the speed and intensity of the music, you'll start to taste the special sauce. They can be skied less aggressively, but never passively. Stomp, clap, hey, has it's place, but not in this ski movie. Jed also likes to listen to metal when he designs skis; it works on a lot of levels. The 110 and 101 have names too, but the stories aren't quite as good, and IMHO the 120 is the clear standout of the trio.
Unfortunately, there's a fair bit of misinformation out there about these skis, most of it perpetrated by K2 sales and marketing. Despite what K2 S&M would like you to think, these skis were never intended to be 50/50 skis. Just look at the radii, these are clearly not mass market skis. They are unapologetically designed for expert and pro level skiers to push their own limits in the backcountry, far away from lifts. That's a pretty small market though, so a square peg was driven into a round hole and now there's a lot of people who have tested these skis in conditions and terrain they were not designed for, and came away with the impression they're not very good skis. I'm not going to disagree, if i used them at an industry demo, i'd probably have a similar opinion.
Development on the Facemelters started immediately after we saw the film Numinous; Pep clearly didn't have the right skis for what he was doing and we told him we'd build him what he needed. Two other non-K2 athletes heavily featured in that film also played a huge role in the design and testing of the 120, and to a lesser extent the 110, along with a couple of other K2 athletes and a few well known guides we work with that probably ski as much powder as anyone on the planet. Almost everyone except the lead engineer wanted the mount point further forward, but it is where it is, and the sidecut, flex, and baseline are all tuned to the recommended mount point. You can move it forward but it comes with drawbacks or at least tradeoffs. The 101 doesn't family quite as well, it doesn't have any of the soft snow characteristics of the 110 and 120, it was steered a little more in the direction of steep skiing. I wish it was more like the Raven, but i don't work in the ski industry anymore, so nothing stopping me from owning and skiing a Raven. Master of Puppets and Raven would be my two ski quiver for the BC. Nothing you can't do on those two skis.
what you should do is go rent some bc skis and see if you even like this shitI should demo a Dispatch 110 or 120 with my alpine boots.
yes. Current take-it-slow plan:what you should do is go rent some bc skis and see if you even like this shit
Sure.yes. Current take-it-slow plan:
- let Christy Sports (satisfaction guarantee through end of next season!) try to fit AT boots to my feet on March 13, the next suitable weekday free time for that
- rent or borrow an AT setup and use it for very safe and boring uphill access within WP for a day
- wait for Blister to publish reviews
- ???
- profit
Just pick up some cheap snow shoes and try that firstThis all would be so much easier if I had rental-boot-amenable 50th percentile feet
Just pick up some cheap snow shoes and try that first
Red Clown Shoes | Costume Accessories
These Red Clown Shoes will add some pizzazz to your clown fit. How can you be taken funnily if you don't have large red shoes flapping around? Stop clowning around and buy them already.www.halloweencostumes.com
Fat biked.
Just remember that whenever you hear someone use the idea of 'quiet recreation' when some skier group tries to ban snowmobiles somewhere.it's louder than I thought it would be!
I mean, "loud" skins on icy snow are several orders of magnitude quieter than snowmobiles, to be fairJust remember that whenever you hear someone use the idea of 'quiet recreation' when some skier group tries to ban snowmobiles somewhere.
Those who know, know
Very recently retired pro roadie, hasn't been skiing long iirc as he couldn't risk injury while still in the pro peloton.Dude seemed like a bit of a terror going downhill for the other peoples, or at least I'd be afraid.
to be fair, wait till you get out on some wind hammered styrofoam shit with skins and cold squeaky boots before taking some kind of stand on two things you have very little experience withI mean, "loud" skins on icy snow are several orders of magnitude quieter than snowmobiles, to be fair
yes but in all fairness, @Toshi will likely only deal with that once, maybe twice.to be fair, wait till you get out on some wind hammered styrofoam shit with skins and cold squeaky boots before taking some kind of stand on two things you have very little experience with
A snowmobile with stock exhaust is NOT orders of magnitude louder. And that shit passes, you're stuck with that other cacophony on your feet all day.
I've heard plenty of ATV/UTV exhausts, and those are fundamentally the same engines/exhausts, no?to be fair, wait till you get out on some wind hammered styrofoam shit with skins and cold squeaky boots before taking some kind of stand on two things you have very little experience with
A snowmobile with stock exhaust is NOT orders of magnitude louder. And that shit passes, you're stuck with that other cacophony on your feet all day.
Nope. Those are 4 strokes. And since you obviously possess great experience, tell me which way those exhaust mufflers point and now tell me which way snowmobile exhaust mufflers point. Which one points at a muffling medium once exiting the vehicle?I've heard plenty of ATV/UTV exhausts, and those are fundamentally the same engines/exhausts, no?
noAre you really asserting that at a given fixed distance a non-idling snowmobile is quieter or as quiet as someone skinning uphill?
I know exactly what you're talking about. A coworker out of our helena office helped the research team set some of that stuff up. Same with reindeer and other large ungulates in sweden. And lynx in CO and ID.....The problem in my ears is the noise situation is a human condition/situation. If you don't want noise, BC ski where 'bilers are not allowed. We have a group here called The MT BC Alliance and lift themselves above others via their purity in movement, both quiet and under their own power. I sent them several articles (many years ago)on some research in the Teton's vicinity RE: elk and wolverines and the impacts of slow quiet skiers and 'bilers moving through habitat. Some wolverines were tagged with GPS and HR units. The slower and quiet skiers caused HR increases as well as greater movement and greater energy expenditure of some wolverines. If I remember correctly, the 'bilers caused less of each. I need to find the paper(s) and see if there are any updates etc. Anyone else know what I am talking about?
Ha! Folks tend to anthropomorphize a bit too much when trying to understand the situation. The quinoa/Cotopaxi complex is our name for them, or qC for short.the only species we truly disturb is affluent white people who migrate to mountain towns ever autumn. There really is no other species on the planet as sensitive...
nature being disturbed by machinesHa! Folks tend to anthropomorphize a bit too much when trying to understand the situation. The quinoa/Cotopaxi complex is our name for them, or qC for short.
Two things.The Cripple Creek guy recommends the Shift binding for my proposed 75/25 (and that's probably very generous to the non-inbounds proportion) use given that I'm a DIN 9 kind of guy. His opinion is that one need not mess with removable toepieces a la the Duke PT for this non-DIN 16 cliff jumping use case, and that I'd like the Shift's elasticity much better than a Tecton setup.
To be clear: I don’t think my risk tolerance would change if I had an airbag either. What I’m trying to say is that my risk tolerance is low enough that I’m just not skiing in places or in conditions where the airbag would ever likely be needed or deployed. Give me 28° trees and I’ll happily make dad turns down that shit all day long. I know, I know, why not be extra safe? I don’t have a great answer for this, TBH. Weight, cost, who knows.He says it doesn't cause him to modify his risk taking behavior fwiw.
Fuck it. Go for the 120s!One of his co-workers at Cripple Creek got K2 Dispatch 110s this season and won't stop talking about them, in that they are exactly what he was looking for to cut through crust and variable snow.
this guy is on the board of the one organization that has gotten more public land closed to snowmobiles (and bikes) than any other I've ever dealt with. I've had to 'work' with them for forest service projects and they are some of the most smug, intolerant arrogant pricks on the planet. We formed our own nonprofit and had to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight the shit they get in place.Maybe you need a pow ski?
Also I can’t believe I’ve forgotten about this place until now. If you’re really backcountry curious, check out Bluebird Backcountry. It’s not a place for people like Woo, or maybe even me, but it’s a great spot to dip your toes in the waters of backcountry skiing. I have been and the terrain and snow conditions are definitely backcountry style. They’ve got avy education clinics, backcountry try travel and techniques clinics, or you can just go tromp around and see what you think. It’s a pretty unique spot, and has its place IMO. They also have all the demo gear you might want, pretty solid stuff if I’m not mistaken.
That’s what I’m using to try to rationalize this: with Shifts and 120ish stiffness AT boots they would be a frontside powder setup… that could be used to go up now and then. Once.Maybe you need a pow ski?