Maybe not if the kids are exposed to it and it's explained. But jesus....how do you think Kindergarten kids will react and how can you explain that to them at that point?"There's really nothing to fear because a person is transgender," said Karina Mari, a mother of three school-age children who said she has transgender relatives.
are you serious? are you that closed minded?partsbara said:what a waste of fvckin DNA...
Don't be such an ass. Calling someone a waste of DNA is pretty dang harsh. This person is doing nothing to harm you or yours. Whether or not they should teach young children is debatable by people way more qualified then any of us.partsbara said:
you want to talk about close minded...Dirty said:are you serious? are you that closed minded?
honestly mate, i could care less what this, or any other freak wants to do... but you have to look at it in context...Ciaran said:Whether or not they should teach young children is debatable by people way more qualified then any of us.
So some dude wants to be a chick? Who cares? How does it harm you? It doesn't? At least he still looks like a guy so people can tell. No one will date her thinking that she's a real woman.
You guys are a bunch of trannyphobe meanies.
You better watch it or Michele will get ya...
partsbara said:i agree rob, kindergarten.... for christ sake... talk about confusion... poor kids have enough BS in their lives without this freakshow...
seriously, you need to give children more credit than that... you d be surprised what they know...jdschall said:Kids that age would have no idea nor would they care, they just want to play with their crayons.
It's us adults that project our percieved notions of sexuallity on to them (right or wrong). They barely know the difference between a pee pee and a who who.
Think about it for a minute.
I'm not saying that parents shouldn't have or don't have an interist in who teaches their kids. As I said above, the merits of this person teaching very young children is debateable by people more qualified than us. We would just be e-speculating. (Which is what we all do best!)partsbara said:honestly mate, i could care less what this, or any other freak wants to do... but you have to look at it in context...
i don t think you have kids (i could be wrong), but you don t want a say in who teaches your children ??? you d be in the minority....
Sure they might know the physical differences between Johnny's peepee and MaryJane's whowho, I mean kids are kids and they are curious. But they have no idea what the implications of those differences are. They don't know what you used them for. Should they? Seems to me that kids get the "talk" around puberty not age 5.partsbara said:seriously, you need to give children more credit than that... you d be surprised what they know...
how do most kids form their opinions ?? from their parents - i m sure you ll agree...
.
If the parents of the kids weren't close minded f*ups then that wouldn't happen now would it?partsbara said:think about what is said at the childs home by the parents... then think about little johnny talking to mark at break time... talk about wild fire
jacksonpt said:I'm not sure I'd want her teaching my daughter (assuming he had previously taught my daughter).
Maybe he just got tired of executing the "goat"*.partsbara said:you honestly believe that his/her intentions are honourable ????
close minded parents are 80% of the battle... having taught kids aged 6 - 18 i have to agree... but seriously, heaps of 'talk' happens waayyy before puberty...jdschall said:Sure they might know the physical differences between Johnny's peepee and MaryJane's whowho, I mean kids are kids and they are curious. But they have no idea what the implications of those differences are. They don't know what you used them for. Should they? Seems to me that kids get the "talk" around puberty not age 5.
If the parents of the kids weren't close minded f*ups then that wouldn't happen now would it?
You make it sound like all gay, bi, trans, goat lovers, whatever are going to take your kid aside and molest them. That's a very ignorant view to have.
At first, I agree. I'm just not sure how I'd explain it to my daughter. She's only 4, but she's bright enough that she would pickup on the fact that 'he' (as far as she knows, she is a he) is now wearing dresses and has long hair. She'd comment on/ask about that, and I'm not sure how I'd explain it to her. I couldn't leave it as "some men like to wear dresses, honey"... so I'm not sure how to address her curiosity without getting into penises and vaginas and whatnot.jdschall said:I think that children would be best suited to deal with this. I mean they are an open book. They don't have all the set biases adults have yet. They are very open minded and accept new ideas readily.
is that from 'mountain goat madness' IV or V ??stevew said:Maybe he just got tired of executing the "goat"*.
*stupid movie reference*
scary thought i imagine... especially with a 4 year old !!!jacksonpt said:so I'm not sure how to address her curiosity without getting into penises and vaginas and whatnot.
Not entirely sure as to the reliability of this, but I remember seeing somewhere that the average age a kid loses his/her virginity these days is 12-13. That's pretty early. I also seem to remember that the study showed that the age of sexual maturity is decreasing (girls hitting menarche around 9 or 10, possiblya year later later, I'm going from memory) as of late. That would mean that indeed, these kinds of issues will begin to crop up in places they shouldn't have to. The article stated she taught K-6th....I remember back in 4th grade getting sex ed (about....9 or 10 years old...I think). It's an interesting conflict if this particular teacher happens to be teaching sex ed.jdschall said:Sure they might know the physical differences between Johnny's peepee and MaryJane's whowho, I mean kids are kids and they are curious. But they have no idea what the implications of those differences are. They don't know what you used them for. Should they? Seems to me that kids get the "talk" around puberty not age 5.
You're quite correct that kids have no previous bias to work against, but I think the issue is this: if we're trying to define gender roles for males and females (whatever they may be these days, I'm no psychologist), what would having a teacher such as this do to those forming gender roles? I mean, there IS a societal expectation from both genders, or at least I think there is. A lot of the time you have kids getting a lot of that gender role from teachers as well as parents. I'm curious how a transgender teacher would affect those gender roles, if they would at all.jdschall said:I think that children would be best suited to deal with this. I mean they are an open book. They don't have all the set biases adults have yet. They are very open minded and accept new ideas readily.
I seriously think, with the way some of our youth are nowadays, I'd be more afraid for the teacher than the kids.jacksonpt said:Now, you put her (the teacher, not my daughter) in a high school, or even junior high, and I have no problems with it in the least.
Different views. No problem. You are right I shouldn't call you ignorant with out more info. I apologize. I just think it would work itself out with little kids okay.partsbara said:close minded parents are 80% of the battle... having taught kids aged 6 - 18 i have to agree... but seriously, heaps of 'talk' happens waayyy before puberty...
you don t really know me so saying that i have a very 'ignorant' view is pretty much off the mark... thats not what i was trying to imply, merely the fact that this person really has no place teaching youngsters...
yea, no kidding.robdamanii said:I seriously think, with the way some of our youth are nowadays, I'd be more afraid for the teacher than the kids.
robdamanii said:I mean, there IS a societal expectation from both genders, or at least I think there is. A lot of the time you have kids getting a lot of that gender role from teachers as well as parents. I'm curious how a transgender teacher would affect those gender roles, if they would at all.
I don't disagree that it's tough. In fact, it's probably one of the hardest thing that people struggle with.jdschall said:Defining gender roles in this day and age must be tough. Who's to say what's right? Do we need defined roles? Is it a continuum with the norm centered around straight hetero? I'd have no idea where to start.
Unlinke drugs or booze, I don't think the kid would suddenly want to change their gender just because the parents say it's bad.OGRipper said:It's almost like learning a new language at that age - much easier because there is less cultural bias and practice. Seeing this happen to someone who was already in their lives could be really good - from a young age they would learn to have open minds. Of course, if you don't agree with the choice this person is making and as parent want to impose your own opinion on your kids you might not want it. And that is understandable I guess - again I am not a parent and am in no place to judge. But to me it smells like denouncing drugs, music or a clothing style - something a parent does at the risk of making the kid more interested in what is forbidden.
jdschall said:The thirteen year old just bought his first Ramones CD and was singing "we're a happy family ... Daddy likes men..." to his Dad the other day.
You are probably right but don't underestimate the extent of rebellion.robdamanii said:Unlinke drugs or booze, I don't think the kid would suddenly want to change their gender just because the parents say it's bad.
I have no experience... at least not that I know of.Ciaran said:Here's a question for all y'all...
What if the person looked good as a woman, and didn't tell the kids? I mean what if this person really looked like a woman, and was just hired so that the only people who know are the school administration. Would you have less of an issue?
And out of curiosity do any of you have experience with transexual people? Friends, relatives, co-workers getting sex changes? I personally know of one person who is doing this. Friend of a friend of a friend type thing. Don't know him very well, but the few times I talked to him he seemed like a cool guy. (I didn't know at the time about his "other" life)
That kid would be the king sh!t at school.OGRipper said:You are probably right but don't underestimate the extent of rebellion.
All I'm saying is you can try to impose a view on someone, or you can be honest about the situation and explain the facts as well as your opinion, and let the kid decide for him/herself. I never liked the first approach when I was a kid.
And yeah I know we're talking about little kids here. And yeah I don't have kids and should probably STFU!