I've said before that I'm not against the death penalty for philosophical reasons, but that I don't want it on the books because of the risk of false positives, and here is another great illustration of why that is:
http://reason.com/news/show/132574.html
Here is some great reasoning from the a court:
In rejecting an appeal by convicted murderer and death row inmate Eddie Lee Howard, the court wrote that Just because Dr. West has been wrong a lot, does not mean, without something more, that he was wrong here.
Wonderful. In other words, "Just because Dr. West will tell the jury whatever the prosecutor wants to hear in exchange for a check, doesn't mean that he was wrong in this case."
http://reason.com/news/show/132574.html
Here is some great reasoning from the a court:
In rejecting an appeal by convicted murderer and death row inmate Eddie Lee Howard, the court wrote that Just because Dr. West has been wrong a lot, does not mean, without something more, that he was wrong here.
Wonderful. In other words, "Just because Dr. West will tell the jury whatever the prosecutor wants to hear in exchange for a check, doesn't mean that he was wrong in this case."