The DH ones don't seem light enough to justify the price.
Plus,how do they know what you use them for as far as warranty?
Plus,how do they know what you use them for as far as warranty?
Wow,great review,well done.What are your thoughts on using the am's for DH racing?I race in "pro"but I'm really not gonna be looking at any podiums,so I'm no Steve Peat.I know enve says not to ride them DH,but Id like to take the chance ,just for the weight savings,but not if they blow up and can't get them replaced.Theyd pretty much just be used at races.just posted my findings of the AM and DH rims here:
http://blistergearreview.com/gear-reviews/enve-composites-xc-am-and-dh-carbon-rims
if that is of interest...
Very good review indeed. Sure agree with your comment about the 21mm internal rim width on the DH. As a fan of 729s, and wide rims in general, these are borderline too narrow.just posted my findings of the AM and DH rims here:
http://blistergearreview.com/gear-reviews/enve-composites-xc-am-and-dh-carbon-rims
if that is of interest...
You just slightly changed the build of my dream bike. This is big news on the internet. But in all seriousness AM rim up front and DH in the back sounds dialed for a no-compromise (wallet included) set up.i would think you could run a AM on the front at the very least.
Good review!my long story short is:
if you want the stiffness of a 721 and at least the durability of an i23 or ex500 (way more than flow, similar to 721), look at the AM26
if you want the stiffness and durability of an 823, look at the DH26
.......
I agree with your statement but companies that leave a back door open to get out of warranty claims make me feel a little uneasy. With today's AM bikes speeds and terrain that can be covered are close to full on DH, so how will they be able to tell what I did? Actually, I think a use of the AM rim with 2-ply tires in a DH application will be safer for the rim then using them in rough AM conditions with a 1-ply tire. However, I am in no rush to try this out (unless I get a bro deal).Use the correct wheel for it's intended purpose that's all I am saying.
VM
i have some coming actually, and will run them thru the same program.the blister boys need to pick up some of those chinese AM rims and compare them to the enve AM rims and some common Al AM rims. for science. or the lulz, whichever applies.
Dh or am riding.Are you fast?do you ride hard and race?If they'd put up with that abuse I think I'd lean towards the am.I'm still on the fence,honestly.For as much ad they are,I'd still rather loose a 1/2 lb of rolling weight.Great review! I've been riding the AM rims for a couple years now and have nothing but good things to say.
Hey,pm me what you pm'd him.I'm pretty sure I wanna know whatever you told him.irider - pm sent.
Most people know if you crack carbon you should stop using it. So the tester kept ridding it and it blew up.does anyone know the story behind this? i seem to remember someone commenting about this somewhere on RM. this isnt their AM rim right?
I'm guessing they'll be at the end of the list for product testing,next time.
"Hey, I cracked it near a spoke...what should we do now"
"Let's keep casing **** till we smash the **** out it,then post pictures on the Internet "
"uuh ,ookay"
Dude,you are so full of CRAP!ENVE claimed that the rims they sent were some sort of lighter prototype after they cracked. Then you read that the actual weight was significantly higher than the claimed weight, and also consider that the supposed production items are heavier still, and you have a million dollar wheelset that weights over 2kg anyway.
As for the breaking - how many cracks have people ridden their alloy rims with? I've ridden rims for the 2nd half of a season with 3-4 cracks that go virtually all the way around the rim at spoke holes before, and am yet to have a catastrophic failure.
I think it's great that pinkbike have stepped it up and started calling out products for what they really are, instead of most reviews that just read like an advertisement. For the record, pinkbike did not publish those pictures of the rim broken in their review as the breakage itself was not considered a fault of the product, and it was actually a regular user that commented with those pictures later.
Over 2kg? What spokes did they use? I thought with the stiffness of a carbon rim you could get away with pretty crazy spoke choices. That is insane since I get around 2kg (probably 10-50g below, haven't weighted the rear without the casette) with a ZTR/Old lighter 823 combo. I know the ride quality is different but given the price difference it is good to know.ENVE claimed that the rims they sent were some sort of lighter prototype after they cracked. Then you read that the actual weight was significantly higher than the claimed weight, and also consider that the supposed production items are heavier still, and you have a million dollar wheelset that weights over 2kg anyway.
As for the breaking - how many cracks have people ridden their alloy rims with? I've ridden rims for the 2nd half of a season with 3-4 cracks that go virtually all the way around the rim at spoke holes before, and am yet to have a catastrophic failure.
I think it's great that pinkbike have stepped it up and started calling out products for what they really are, instead of most reviews that just read like an advertisement. For the record, pinkbike did not publish those pictures of the rim broken in their review as the breakage itself was not considered a fault of the product, and it was actually a regular user that commented with those pictures later.
I was a bit confused too, when I read Enve's statement and then, got back to rim/wheelset weights. I just doesn't sum up. If the rims we "lighter, proto versions", why would total weight be ca. 80g higher than claimed? It's hard for me to believe that CK hubs or used spokes would be that "much" heavier.ENVE claimed that the rims they sent were some sort of lighter prototype after they cracked. Then you read that the actual weight was significantly higher than the claimed weight, and also consider that the supposed production items are heavier still, and you have a million dollar wheelset that weights over 2kg anyway.
King hubs and DT Comp spokes...so you can calculate the actual weight of the rims.I was a bit confused too, when I read Enve's statement and then, got back to rim/wheelset weights. I just doesn't sum up. If the rims we "lighter, proto versions", why would total weight be ca. 80g higher than claimed? It's hard for me to believe that CK hubs or used spokes would be that "much" heavier.
As for the crack, I would like to see the test which shows best DH alloy rim (Mavic 721?) subject the force which would crack Enve DH rim.
As in 'Yes everybody keeps saying that so don't make that part of the argument'tell me more!