Righto, whilst I must profess to being a dirty foreigner I did think that a basic tenant of the US electoral system was that you had to have been born in the US to become president.
So can someone explain to me why this newspaper article is talking about Arnie as "leaving the governor's mansion in 2010 to stand for a US Senate seat, an ideal platform for a presidential tilt."
Its an Aussie paper, but usually reputable and the way I read it suggests that the idea was put to David Bradley of the Hoover institute who you would think might have an idea about such things and he doesn't discount it out of hand.
So is this just a silly mistake or am I missing some recent developments and Arnie is indeed able to run for pres?
So can someone explain to me why this newspaper article is talking about Arnie as "leaving the governor's mansion in 2010 to stand for a US Senate seat, an ideal platform for a presidential tilt."
Its an Aussie paper, but usually reputable and the way I read it suggests that the idea was put to David Bradley of the Hoover institute who you would think might have an idea about such things and he doesn't discount it out of hand.
So is this just a silly mistake or am I missing some recent developments and Arnie is indeed able to run for pres?