Zutroy said:Here is a link for the company that makes them. There is one other company doing something similar, but i can't remember the name.
http://www.osymetric.com/index.php
MMike said:How is it different than Biopace rings from the late 80's?
My bro still has them on him waaaaaay old Trek (1988?). They are weird.
Assuming my saracasm detector is functioning correctly, would this make a huge difference in a DH run? Well there are plenty of factors involved with a winning run, so this might be 1% or 10%.Jm_ said:If you race, you NEED to buy or make this product NOW. If you do not, you will LOSE your next race.
sanjuro said:Assuming my saracasm detector is functioning correctly
you know what they say about assuming things.....sanjuro said:Assuming my saracasm detector is functioning correctly....
sanjuro said:Assuming my saracasm detector is functioning correctly, would this make a huge difference in a DH run? Well there are plenty of factors involved with a winning run, so this might be 1% or 10%.
This reminds me of Greg Lemond's use of aero bars in the 1989 TdF. No one else used them, and I am sure other riders laughed. However, as Lemond proved, aero position is 90% of time trialing, and I believe he won every time trial that year, by a wide margin.
heheTranscend said:If you look, you will see he does indeed have a taco on that guide. It would be damn hard to hit a chainring and do that much damage with one of those on there. You'd have to miss the taco, and still get the ring 1cm away...
vitox said:lemond used not only aero bars but helmet and wheels to win recoup 58 seconds on the last stage of the tdf and beat fignon by 8 seconds in a 1 month race, but i think this is a different case. he was not the only one back then either, just remember superman obree.
in 1989 aero was new, as in just invented, both because of the previous non availability of materials and analysis facilities to design aero. elliptical chainrings like these have been around since approximately 100 years (not exaggerating) and the pros and cons have been know for just as long. granted the osymetric rings or these rotor q rings are new but what they bring to the table over conventional ellpitical rings is not useful for a dh application.
maybe they work out for barel and his particular bike and riding style, but i dont see it taking over like aero did.
scurban said:correct me if I'm wrong, but does it look like he colored the scratches in his ring in with a sharpie? It does to me.
The Scott bars were not unheard of. There were a lot of triathletes using them. But it had not received acceptance into the peleton until Lemond.Zutroy said:Actually aero bars had been floating around in Triathlon for several years before they showed up in straight cycling, i had aero bars on my bike in 89, and even then the idea was taken from ski racing. Is it something that's going to take over no....could it possible help at the WC level...you bet....there have been some races won by really small margins, so even if it only gives you a 1% power difference that could be enough to put you over the top. Time will tell, a couple years ago..compact drivetrains for road were considered silly, now it's fairly common.