I don't imply anything. Here it is in big, bold letters.Seriously, you imply that George bush is stupid, I mean, come on, do you actually read your own posts?
George Bush is an idiot.
I don't imply anything. Here it is in big, bold letters.Seriously, you imply that George bush is stupid, I mean, come on, do you actually read your own posts?
It's what my handlers sleep-taught me to do as a beta plus. I'm doubleplus good at it.Fair enough.
No use arguing with you anyway, you have this depressing ability to bring logic and common sense to the table so it's no fun at all.
Well if shooting holes in kids doesn't cause at least momentary introspection I don't know what would. I'm sorry to be shocked that some people here can so casually mention killing innocent people regardless of circumstances. I'll be sure to toughen up in future.
Original post that I asked about;I'm more impressed with the "callously cold way" you can derive tone and feeling from text and shove it in the face of someone who is sharing a horrible experience with you. I do not think he was bragging or being insensitive, but merely saying walk in their shoes because unfortunatley he wore the same pair. Since he is not a salesman, his delivery is simple, true and honest- you can not blame him for that since he did not insinuate anyone deserved it- that would be callous.
I asked for a bit of clarification of this. Seems to me that "not" should be replaced by "only", as I read again I see what he means but no points for style. Still seems cold to me. As has already been established ymmv.Well hell, I've killed a handful innocent people myself but not after my rules of engagement were adhered to.
I'd agree that the way it's written is extremely dismissive. With the "well hell" and "not" there's really only one way to read it as a stand-alone comment. R00s other comments point to a pretty thoughtful guy though, so I think it's safe to assume it's just poorly expressed.I asked for a bit of clarification of this. Seems to me that "not" should be replaced by "only", as I read again I see what he means but no points for style. Still seems cold to me. As has already been established ymmv.
Your shortsightedness makes the world a dangerous place for everyone. You must be proud.thier ignorance smells like douche water and burnt latex
Well put, except for the arguing bit. This is a place for arguing. It says on the door.You'll find that Chang and MMike don't have much sympathy for anyone who is put or has put themselves (which, this being a volunteer/contract business is everyone) into a situation where they might have to kill or be killed in a foreign country. Not really worth arguing over.
If you chose to serve in such a role as we have been discussing in Iraq with foreknowledge of the situation there, I don't have much respect for you, put it like that.That's not precisely what we're discussing...it's more of a question of whether/how much the tools of the policy share responsibility for the bad policy being implemented. MMike and Chang believe they share as much or more.
None of us here anyway.None of us think the policy was a good idea from the outset.
Me too.Mike, I'm having a hard time reconciling R00's observations with yours on oversight and control of Blackwater.
I agree, I think his posts are excellent and it was actually "gonefirefightin's" post that I took issue with.I'd agree that the way it's written is extremely dismissive. With the "well hell" and "not" there's really only one way to read it as a stand-alone comment. R00s other comments point to a pretty thoughtful guy though, so I think it's safe to assume it's just poorly expressed.
Well said.As for my personal experiences with this war, my actions and what happened to innocent people, those are thoughts, feelings and memories I will keep to myself. I never did anything illegal or morally reprehensible, but some things you see, things that no one should have to see, you just feel guilty, like its your fault somehow, but you know its not.
And it is something that I will never be able to let go of.
Well, like I said from the outset, I'm discussing the Blackwater employees under the WPPS contract who protect State Department diplomats. Everything I've said about that is 100% accurate, and they're the guys who supposedly preciptated the incident in question here.Mike, I'm having a hard time reconciling R00's observations with yours on oversight and control of Blackwater. Is he misperceiving this, confusing companies, or is it possible that Blackwater employees behave differently under direct observation than not?
You do realize that he took an IED to the face?....style points are probably not his biggest worry...Original post that I asked about;
I asked for a bit of clarification of this. Seems to me that "not" should be replaced by "only", as I read again I see what he means but no points for style. Still seems cold to me. As has already been established ymmv.
American diplomats resumed travel Friday in Iraq in convoys escorted by Blackwater USA
It would be a great PR move. Let Blackwater deny, and then after they've dug the hole, produce the tape.http://www.reuters.com/news/video/videoStory?videoId=66783
That's certainly not looking good press-wise. Apparently the Iraqi MoI is claiming it has a video of the incident itself, but if so, I don't see why it hasn't been disclosed yet...
Wierd. In standard civil engineering vernacular "gray water" is from showers and sinks; "blackwater" is sewage.BTW, Blackwater is the name for all the scum water from the showers and sinks that they collect here. They then spray it on the roads to keep the dust down. I have NO IDEA why they decided to call themselves that.
RV speak too...Wierd. In standard civil engineering vernacular "gray water" is from showers and sinks; "blackwater" is sewage.
Let's call a spade a spade...VBIEDs are one of the favored modes of attack on a motorcade. How do you expect a PSD, contractor or military, to respond to someone driving aggressively and ignoring the large "keep back" signs, pointed weapons, and warning flares fired in their directon? Motorcades are not low-profile. Sucks to have your head up your ass while driving in Iraq...US and other drivers have paid the price, as well.A draft congressional report says Blackwater is, quote A bunch of out of control, crazy, narcissistic cowboys.
Okay, they didnt really say that, but when it is reported that:
A) in 80% of the shootings, Blackwater fired first
B) During the last incident, one Blackwater guy drew his weapon on another one who refused to stop shooting people well you know you have a problem.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/10/01/blackwater.report/index.html
Way to win the hearts and minds fellas.
BTW, Blackwater is the name for all the scum water from the showers and sinks that they collect here. They then spray it on the roads to keep the dust down. I have NO IDEA why they decided to call themselves that.
Very polished, I couldn't even see Dick Cheney's lips move. It was only the part about the extract of Iraqi whore babies restoring his vitality that gave the game away.Anyone watch the owner of BW in the hearings? I thought he gave fantastic answers to all kinds of emotion-and-common-misconception-driven questions and accusations....from the small portion I saw.
You freaking hippies and RV users need to eat some fiber or something."Burning man fling it on your friends when they're drunk" speak as well
Blackwater is untreated sewage. That's no lie.
He's a Navy SEAL, what would you expect?Anyone watch the owner of BW in the hearings? I thought he gave fantastic answers to all kinds of emotion-and-common-misconception-driven questions and accusations....from the small portion I saw.
The have been accused.No military PSDs, who use the same SOPs, have been accused, tried, or convicted of misconduct, either...
I think you're confused about my point to MR. I was discussing military PSDs (staffed by guys in uniform, who follow the same procedures as Blackwater), not contractors, to make a point.The have been accused.
They can't be tried etc due to US government interference.
Do they always use US army SOP's (some of which are iffy in regards to the geneva convention which is pretty much the bench mark in regard to conduct)?
There does not appear to be any CLEAR accountablity for their operations for a private organization funded by (a lot of) public money.
Certainly Marin's eyewitness account's which are so wildly at odd's with your pronouncements are cause for some concern, enough I feel that there should be some form of independent Court of Enquiry into it to sort out what is actually going on. Untill there is something like that I'd have to say file under "dodgy dealings". lthumbsdown: