Do you have a better suggestion? Maybe if your people hadn't starved every government agency with assistance programs for low-income and single mothers, they would be more capable of looking after a special needs child. Maybe if your people would allow public funding of abortion services, you'd have more say in how those were advised and carried out. But don't back poor women into a corner, reduce access to sex education, reduce access to birth control, reduce access to child-care, reduce access to welfare, and then blame their last outlet for help when the best course of action when faced with a child they don't know how to care for and couldn't afford if they did know is to not have that child.how actually caring is it that when pre-natal testing suggests a special needs child (*very* broadly defined, btw), termination is the suggested course of action?