Would it also be inconsistent for him the SELL prescription medication? Because apparently that's what the feds think he did right now... we'll see how that pans out.Originally posted by $tinkle
...but he's not dumb.
He had his back surgery 5/6 yrs ago, & has since been medicated/addicted/whatever. It would be inconsistent for him to level his insight at current events & disregard his own inevitable undoing (a-la king David).
Really, what's the difference? It seems to me that one lot go to jail while the other lot get treatment and help. That's about the only difference I can see.Originally posted by LordOpie
There is a difference between becoming addicted to doctor prescribed meds than illegals.
I don't know any doctors who have your housekeeper pick up your prescriptions in the parking lot of a Denny's :devil:Originally posted by LordOpie
I hate the guy, but don't we need to wait if there are criminal charges before stringing him up? There is a difference between becoming addicted to doctor prescribed meds than illegals. And I also think that people are too hard on guys like Brett Farve who went thru the same thing.
Hopefully, Rush will be a bit more understanding about the bigger picture now. Maybe he'll come to realize that no one really intends to become and addict -- prescribed or illegal.
one is passive, the other active. No one tries coke thinking they'll get addicted, but it was a voluntary choice. If you're laying in a hospital bed and they're pumping morphine into you, well, don't you think that's different?Originally posted by valve bouncer
Really, what's the difference? It seems to me that one lot go to jail while the other lot get treatment and help. That's about the only difference I can see.
Addicted is addicted Opie, the drugs don't discriminate. People actively abuse legal meds and others use illegal drugs for medical purposes. Things are not black and white. The idiocy of creating a hierachy of addiction should be apparent to all. This joker is not better or worse than any other addict, he's just addicted, pointing fingers doesn't help anyone.Originally posted by LordOpie
one is passive, the other active. No one tries coke thinking they'll get addicted, but it was a voluntary choice. If you're laying in a hospital bed and they're pumping morphine into you, well, don't you think that's different?
I hope he beats his addiction.Originally posted by Damn True
...some real compassion being voiced here.
Shame on you, and shame on those who are salivating at the chance to lash out at Limbaugh.
Love him or hate him, addiction is a disease. One often accompanied by denial.
Lash out? Not me - I'm waiting for the lynch mob. :evil:Originally posted by Damn True
Shame on you, and shame on those who are salivating at the chance to lash out at Limbaugh.
Is hypocrisy also a disease?Originally posted by Damn True
Love him or hate him, addiction is a disease.
difference is, jerry was out w/ his use."When you strip it all away," Rush had said of the Grateful Dead guitarist, "Jerry Garcia destroyed his life on drugs. And yet he's being honored, like some godlike figure. Our priorities are out of whack, folks."
Context.Originally posted by ohio
Is hypocrisy also a disease?
hmmm.... know many smokers that have tried to quit? how about obese folks dieting? All addicts that know they DO have a problem.Originally posted by Damn True
I have never met an addict who didn't think that THEY didn't have a problem
I'm sure I wasn't the only PD forum regular to have a slight chuckle at Mr Arch-Conservative DT preaching compassion and understandingOriginally posted by Damn True
...some real compassion being voiced here.
Shame on you, and shame on those who are salivating at the chance to lash out at Limbaugh.
Love him or hate him, addiction is a disease. One often accompanied by denial.
Rush has influence. For good or bad, MANY people value his opinions, and have adopted it. By nature of a democracy that means his expressed opinions have affected our drug policies. He will reap what he's sown.Originally posted by slein
who did RUSH harm in his escapades? besides being a mouthpiece - covered by freedom of speech
couldn't find the his name anywhere at the Office of National Drug Control Policy's reference page for their media campaign strategy.By nature of a democracy that means his expressed opinions have affected our drug policies.
yep, it's a rather cheap sch II substance as classified by the DEAHe'll get a slap on the wrist and the best treatment money can buy. Hell, monetarily, he can afford the addiction...
what does that have to do w/ anything? Is he supposed to staff a position that tracks the users/abusers & send out get well soon cards? You know that if he vilified anyone for their use/abuse, that sound byte would be all over the 'net - and it ain't. looks like a lot of arm waving here.The people worthy of compassion are those that were shown none by him in the past, despite being in far worse situations.
Oh, I'm sorry; are you not familiar with the concept of democracy?Originally posted by $tinkle
couldn't find the his name anywhere at the Office of National Drug Control Policy's reference page for their media campaign strategy.
See Silver's quotation. You obviously are not a true Rush fan, if you aren't familiar with his preachings.Originally posted by $tinkle
You know that if he vilified anyone for their use/abuse, that sound byte would be all over the 'net - and it ain't. looks like a lot of arm waving here.
Well thank God there's at least THAT semblance of an excuse for the worthless drivel he's been spewing.Originally posted by $tinkle
Just think, he's been stoned the last 5/6 years.