I do think that this is a very good point though a could be accomplished several ways. A legislation based specifically on banning a breed because of a stigma only helps to reinforce the stigma. And unfortunately protecting the breed is not what is in the interest of BSL. As well, dogs that attack and kill people are not always owned by gang members and dog fighters. They are owned by all kinds of people. People who make their dogs aggressive intentionally as well as people who do it unintentionally. (By roping them in the backyard, the biggest factor in fatal dogs attacks.) Anyone can have a dog, even if they have no clue the do's and the do not's of owning an animal that has the capacity to kill someone. After working with dogs, I don't trust any dog. Each and every one has a limit that can be pushed. Responsible owners understand that and give the dog an environment in which is can thrive.
I personally have no issue with mandatory sterilization of household pet dogs. Another huge factor in dog attacks is "in tact" males, females in estrus, or females who have just given birth. You should not be able to find dogs with these characteristics living in a dense urban area (or in any random household IMO). There are plenty of unwanted dogs that need placement. Certified breeders are a different story.
But I guess the point is that there are so many factors that go in to a dog attack. BSL is the easiest answer to the problem, but it isn't a solution. It's a band-aid on a very big problem that needs a real answer.
