Quantcast

Bush Ducks Punishment (and Shoes) to the End...

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
not everyone can be tom jones

good thing for w it wasn't richard reid throwing the shoe
 

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
Had that have happened to Barack, he would have grabbed them out of the air and pitched them back at the guy. knocking him senseless....


edit: or better yet, he would have waved his hand like Yoda, and stopped the shoes in mid air and returned them to the guy's head...
 

Samirol

Turbo Monkey
Jun 23, 2008
1,437
0
Had that have happened to Barack, he would have grabbed them out of the air and pitched them back at the guy. knocking him senseless....


edit: or better yet, he would have waved his hand like Yoda, and stopped the shoes in mid air and returned them to the guy's head...
the shoes would have split midair flying harmlessly around him
 

bohorec

Monkey
Jun 26, 2007
327
0
What a waste of shoes.

On a side note props to bush for rapid and effective reaction. I doubt that fat fellow beside him would be able to duck at all.
 

stevew

resident influencer
Sep 21, 2001
41,359
10,287
edit: or better yet, he would have waved his hand like Yoda, and stopped the shoes in mid air and returned them to the guy's head...
think Neo....

not everyone can be tom jones
Had the reporter thrown his swamp ass tidy whities, george might have caught and sniffed.
 
Last edited:

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
i wonder how many late night shows are going to have variations on the phrase "lame duck"
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
26
SF, CA
Anyone catch that Dana Perino took a microphone to the face during the melee?

[insert witty punchline here]
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
I was watching to Rachel Maddow, and I heard two things: the shoe thrower could get 7 or 8 years (or even more) and the Iraqi Prime Minister is pushing for the maximum sentence.

The other thing was that the US could request extradition so the shoe thrower could avoid being sentenced in Iraq. The first thing I thought: Gitmo!
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
89,404
27,626
media blackout
they should punish him by making him walk around barefoot in the desert the rest of his fvcking life. Seriously, of the 8 people in Iraq that have shoes, there HAD to be one asshat.
 

X3pilot

Texans fan - LOL
Aug 13, 2007
5,860
1
SoMD
Bush reacted faster than the secret service.

Shoe man deserved a bullet in the forehead. Bush, Obama, Maleki or whatever the Iraq puupet's name is. You throw something or show that level of aggression not mention disrepsect, for a national leader of any country, protective service should have the right to cap your ass.
 

valve bouncer

Master Dildoist
Feb 11, 2002
7,843
114
Japan
Bush reacted faster than the secret service.

Shoe man deserved a bullet in the forehead. Bush, Obama, Maleki or whatever the Iraq puupet's name is. You throw something or show that level of aggression not mention disrepsect, for a national leader of any country, protective service should have the right to cap your ass.
Well he was out of ammo after the second one, can't shoot an unshod man.
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
they should punish him by making him walk around barefoot in the desert the rest of his fvcking life. Seriously, of the 8 people in Iraq that have shoes, there HAD to be one asshat.
i read conflicting reports of his citizenship. read one bit that put him as an egyptian foreign correspondent. if true, just let him go. no harm, no foul.
 

3D.

Monkey
Feb 23, 2006
899
0
Chinafornia USA
He might get two years under Iraqi law, but it'll probably come with a job promotion and a new fan club...
The Lebanese television channel NTV, known for its opposition to Washington, went as far as offering a job to the journalist.
In its evening news bulletin on Monday, it said that if he takes the job, he will be paid "from the moment the first shoe was thrown".
Wearing fatigues and brandishing Kalashnikov assault rifles, they stamped on photographs of the US president and held banners in support of the journalist.
 

Silver

find me a tampon
Jul 20, 2002
10,840
1
Orange County, CA
Shoe man deserved a bullet in the forehead. Bush, Obama, Maleki or whatever the Iraq puupet's name is. You throw something or show that level of aggression not mention disrepsect, for a national leader of any country, protective service should have the right to cap your ass.
Yeah, I'm sure that would have gone over really well with the Iraqi people as a whole...
 

bohorec

Monkey
Jun 26, 2007
327
0
Bush reacted faster than the secret service.

Shoe man deserved a bullet in the forehead. Bush, Obama, Maleki or whatever the Iraq puupet's name is. You throw something or show that level of aggression not mention disrepsect, for a national leader of any country, protective service should have the right to cap your ass.
Weird, I thought throwing shoes in a war criminal is only a minor offence. Reporter should practice harder and wear some heavy holland clogs, that way he could pin down both puppets on stage.
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
I don't if Bush is denying the obvious, but if he did not have Secret Service protection or extremely tight public availability, most of his meetings would be as hostile (or worse).

Imagine a townhall meeting in Manhattan.
 

MikeD

Leader and Demogogue of the Ridemonkey Satinists
Oct 26, 2001
11,737
1,820
chez moi
Latest reports are that al-Zaidi now has a broken arm and ribs and possibly eye and leg injuries as well.



Sure is a good thing that the US does not torture people! :disgust1:
Hey, genius, it was the IRAQIS who had custody of the shoe-thrower.

And though I'm not intimate with the venue in question, I doubt the Secret Service had total control of the venue--when you're on someone else's turf, you often have to play by their rules. Plus, they were obviously told the agent in charge, who provides the close body protection, could not be on-camera. I'm sure they had full screening on the room and everyone in it to ensure there were no weapons or explosives present, but they were probably not heavy inside the room and relied on the locals to provide most of the in-room security response.

Still, not a good day for anyone, esp. the thrower. Ouch.
 

RenegadeRick

98th percentile on my SAT & all I got was this tin
Hey, genius, it was the IRAQIS who had custody of the shoe-thrower.
If that is the case then I guess we did a good job showing them how someone in custody deserves to be treated.

No matter how you look at it the whole clusterfunk over there always comes down to being our fault. America™ should be ashamed of herself and her horribly poor manners. It is really like we crashed a party, forced our way in the door, drank all the beer and then started trashing the place. It weighs heavily on my heart in this season. We really need to find a way to treat the people of the planet with some funking respect.
 
Last edited:

MikeD

Leader and Demogogue of the Ridemonkey Satinists
Oct 26, 2001
11,737
1,820
chez moi
When the stupidity hurts so much, I cannot help but cry out in pain.

It's certainly America's fault for bringing a brutal, heavy-handed approach to law enforcement and oppression of political dissidence to Iraq. Such behavior would NEVER have been concievable unless we showed up.

I am no fan of America's policies and strategic-level actions in/towards Iraq. They've been stupid, self-defeating, and painful for everyone they have touched. That doesn't mean I can brook complete idiocy.
 

Silver

find me a tampon
Jul 20, 2002
10,840
1
Orange County, CA
It's certainly America's fault for bringing a brutal, heavy-handed approach to law enforcement and oppression of political dissidence to Iraq. Such behavior would NEVER have been concievable unless we showed up.
The only problem with that notion is that it makes the implicit assumption that just because Saddam's treatment of dissidents was atrocious, our (alleged) bad treatment is acceptable. This doesn't even begin to touch on the fact that we've sent people to our allies (and sometimes not allies, eg. Syria) to be tortured.

Now, I understand that you don't think that way. The problem is, it's been an implicit (and sometimes explicit) way of thinking about the war in mainstream American politics since the beginning...
 
Last edited: