Don't worry.this news is just awesome to hear less than 2 weeks before i turn 18. i keep wondering where they expect the troops that they need will come from. because i sure as hell am not enlisting.
Charlie Rangle loves you.
Don't worry.this news is just awesome to hear less than 2 weeks before i turn 18. i keep wondering where they expect the troops that they need will come from. because i sure as hell am not enlisting.
Ha, I was listening to that Clash song while reading this thread.When they kick out your front door, how you gonna come, with your hands on your head or on the trigger of your gun...
forget for a moment the number of kids already killed by the poorly executed invasion...
Invasion was actually very well executed. The war itself was poorly conceived. (I know its nit-picky, just had to throw it in...)
Militarily things have been good, in all reality. Its the aftermath and the lack of an exit strategy that is the biggest issue.
exactly !!!
the funny thing to keep your eye on now is,
all the dems. in congress with the illusion of new found power.
flippin and a floppin over what to do next.
as one by one or all at once they realize they don't have what it takes to keep "W" from doing as he damn well pleases.
"she" doesn't control the purse strings like she thinks she does.
this is gonna get good.
AWESOME!.exactly !!!
the funny thing to keep your eye on now is,
all the dems. in congress with the illusion of new found power.
flippin and a floppin over what to do next.
as one by one or all at once they realize they don't have what it takes to keep "W" from doing as he damn well pleases.
"she" doesn't control the purse strings like she thinks she does.
this is gonna get good.
in spite of everything done by a republican administration, flip-flopping still seems to be an exclusive democrat trait.
Actually, it's 8 years total. . .at least in the Army it is.If they are short (and they are) They'll probably recall inactive reserves. People who were in the military for less than six years are automatically transfered to the inactive reserves at the conclusion of their active service, until they reach six years total.
gnurider1080 said:this news is just awesome to hear less than 2 weeks before i turn 18. i keep wondering where they expect the troops that they need will come from. because i sure as hell am not enlisting.
And whats with all the hate towards enlisting anyways? When you join the military it does not mean that you are signing up to agree with every stupid decision some politician makes for you. It just means that you have the balls, and are willing to serve your country. You think all the troops over there agree with what they are doing?Fonzie18 said:Ditto on not enlisting.
Serve your country.... which means what exactly?. It just means that you have the balls, and are willing to serve your country. You think all the troops over there agree with what they are doing?
Do the bidding of the democraticly elected government without question. It's not a popular admin and their choices arent popular either, but you still have to have a loyal workforce.Serve your country.... which means what exactly?
Well yes. But I (being the canadian coward that I guess I am), just don't see the "reward" for "serving your country".....especially if you happen to not agree with what you're being forced to do.Do the bidding of the democraticly elected government without question. It's not a popular admin and their choices arent popular either, but you still have to have a loyal workforce.
That sounds great. Sign me up. I LOVE it when other people tell me what to do. ESPECIALLY people whose intelligence and actions I don't respect.Do the bidding of the democraticly elected government without question.
Well, for one, you can go to college and get paid for it when you're done like Im doing. Also, anytime you get pulled over/arrested you get to shout "You cant do this to me, Im a veteran" and exclusive rights to the phrase "You dont know man, you werent there!"Well yes. But I (being the canadian coward that I guess I am), just don't see the "reward" for "serving your country".....especially if you happen to not agree with what you're being forced to do.
Well the way I looked at it was that I grew up in a pretty damned great place, and it cost the lives of alot of people for me to live so comfortably, without even the threat of foreign invasion. I figured I owed it to my kids.That sounds great. Sign me up. I LOVE it when other people tell me what to do. ESPECIALLY people whose intelligence and actions I don't respect.
lthumbsdown:
BS is right; servitude - by its nature - is unconditionally submissive.That sounds great. Sign me up. I LOVE it when other people tell me what to do. ESPECIALLY people whose intelligence and actions I don't respect.
lthumbsdown:
Ooohhh....that DOES sound appealing..and exclusive rights to the phrase "You dont know man, you werent there!"
I tried that a couple weeks ago, it don't work. I had my cammies and flak jacket in the back seat too.Also, anytime you get pulled over/arrested you get to shout "You cant do this to me, Im a veteran"
And now you live in a place with the daily threat of terror. And who is beating the terror drum? The US government! This is such an improvement!...without even the threat of foreign invasion.
Well, to me it meant volunteering to give up some of my own freedoms, safety, and personal comforts so that my children will never have to.Serve your country.... which means what exactly?
My personal favorite is going to hang out with "old war buddies . . . . you wouldn't understand."Well, for one, you can go to college and get paid for it when you're done like Im doing. Also, anytime you get pulled over/arrested you get to shout "You cant do this to me, Im a veteran" and exclusive rights to the phrase "You dont know man, you werent there!"
That is because you are reaping the rewards/benefits of the folks before you that served..............I just don't see the "reward" for "serving your country".....especially if you happen to not agree with what you're being forced to do.
Well, to be honest, it sort of does. Enlisting in the military when the military is being run the way it is now is in no way "serving your country". You are serving the current admin and what ever they decide to do with you. Agree or disagree, you do their bidding for 8 years.My point was that enlisting in the military doesn't make you an evil stormtrooper loyal to Darth Dubya and his oil mongering ways.
that's not irony; that's hypocrisy.To me it is supreme irony that a guy who avoided service in SEA would so willingly send other peoples kids into a hazy war for oil or ME control or whatever his reasons are. To me the supreme test of whether a war is worth fighting is if the POTUS would send his own children to fight in it...
What are you talking about? As far as I know, the Vietnamese never invaded South Texas, and credit for that can be placed directly at the feet of George W. Bush for his willingness to sometimes serve in the Texas Air Guard.I am military, and am 110% NOT a Bush supporter. To me it is supreme irony that a guy who avoided service in SEA would so willingly send other peoples kids into a hazy war for oil or ME control or whatever his reasons are.
Willingness to sometime serve, now that's funny....and credit for that can be placed directly at the feet of George W. Bush for his willingness to sometimes serve in the Texas Air Guard.
Apparently America's youth agrees with you:Well, to me it meant volunteering to give up some of my own freedoms, safety, and personal comforts so that my children will never have to.
800,000 Privileged Youths Enlist To Fight In Iraq
'We've Been So Selfish'
January 10, 2007 | Issue 4302
WASHINGTON, DCCiting a desire to finally make a difference in Iraq, in the past two weeks, more than 800,000 young people from upper-middle- and upper-class families have put aside their education, careers, and physical well-being to enlist in the military, new data from the Department Of Defense shows.
"I don't know if it was the safety and comfort of the holidays or what, but I realized that my affluence and ease of living comes at a cost," said Private Jonathan Grace, 18, who was to commence studies at Dartmouth College next fall, but will instead attend 12 weeks of basic training before being deployed to Fallujah with the 1st Army Battalion. "I just looked at my parents in their cashmere sweaters and thought, 'Who am I to go to an elite liberal arts college and spend all my time reading while, in the real world, thousands of kids my age are sacrificing their lives for our country?' It's not right."
Added Grace: "Whether I agree with the war or not, our president needs us, and I'll be damned if I'm going to let our least advantaged citizens bear the brunt of this awesome burden."
At the on-campus temporary recruitment table at Reed College in Portland, OR, the line of students eager to sign up for active duty stretched around the block Monday. Recruiters across the country reported a similar trend, with scores of young people asking how soon they could be ready to go to battle in Iraq.
"They don't have these recruitment centers where I live," said Daniel Feldman, 26, who resides in the affluent neighborhood of Brookline, MA and recently passed his bar exam. "I didn't realize you could just sign up, but now that I do, all of my friends from law school, yoga class, and temple are going to join, too. And not the Reserves either. We're talking down and dirty, right on the front lines."
Drill sergeants at boot camps in South Carolina and San Diego, though at first skeptical of the recent crop of potential Marines, said they have been impressed by their work ethic, claiming the wealthy youngsters' desire to "do their part" is undeniable.
"They haven't complained once since getting here," Sergeant Greg Forenczek said of the new upper-crust recruits. "Usually, after the first two hours, you know who's going to get dismissed early, but not with these kids. There's a fire in their eyesa fearless passion to become U.S. soldiers"
"They inspire me," Forenczek added.
New Marine Sierra Pettingill, a 22-year-old sociology major who left Duke University before her final semester, said she felt compelled to serve after realizing she did not have a single acquaintance who had died, or even served, in Iraq.
"I was sending out invitations to my champagne-brunch birthday get-together when I heard that U.S. military casualties in Iraq had reached 2,900," Pettingill said. "I decided then and there that I would not allow this inherently unequal system to perpetuate any longer, no matter how much I want to go have martini night at the Oak Room."
Though most of the privileged enlistee youths said they were motivated by a newfound concern that America's reputation could be permanently damaged with a loss in Iraq, others have cited the examples set by their relatives as instrumental in their decision to join.
"My great-great-great-great grandfather would not have been able to make a fortune in the fur trade and real-estate business had it not been for the brave people who fought in the Revolutionary War," said 24-year-old John Jacob Astor VIII, who has put all of his business ventures on hold indefinitely. "My children are going to know the importance of stepping up to the plate when their nation needs them."
"From this day forth, the Astor name will be synonymous with sacrifice," he added.
U.S. Gen. John Abizaid, who has in the past argued against a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq, now says that with the influx of nearly a million troops expected to be on the ground Feb. 1, the region should be stabilized within six weeks.
I find that hard to believe.Apparently America's youth agrees with you:
cute. I especially like the headline.Apparently America's youth agrees with you:
Which, in many ways, is of limited utility.I guess I see what you mean. Perhaps I misspoke.
What I meant was that by joining the military it does not mean that you are 100% a Bush supporter, and in favor of this war, or anything like that. You still can vote however you want. You still have your own opinions. You can serve in the military and be against this war and the way it is run.
However you do have a point that no matter what my opinion is, if I get my orders to go back overseas. . . .I will be going overseas whether I like it or not.
serve the country, but not the gov't seems a lot like "i support the troops, but not the war".Which, in many ways, is of limited utility.
I support veterans and current soldiers and considered enlisting before I went to college, but there's no way in hell I would do it now. I love my country, but I don't have many grandiose ideas about serving it. I think it's ridiculous that most people limit "serving your country" to following the orders of its government. I serve my country, not its government. To me, there is a distinction and it's a big one.
hahahahaaaaa"They don't have these recruitment centers where I live," said Daniel Feldman, 26, who resides in the affluent neighborhood of Brookline, MA and recently passed his bar exam. "I didn't realize you could just sign up, but now that I do, all of my friends from law school, yoga class, and temple are going to join, too. And not the Reserves either. We're talking down and dirty, right on the front lines."
Troops are people. You can support the people with out supporting the war they are serving in. The distinction seems pretty clear to me.serve the country, but not the gov't seems a lot like "i support the troops, but not the war".
the 2 are tightly coupled; there is no magic line over which exactly one is supported at the expense of the other.